FIRSTLY-TO MAKE MY CASE I WILL EXPLAIN WHAT AN ‘OFF LABEL MEDICINE ‘is, later you will find out why I am explaining this ‘An Off Label Medicine is an unapproved drug can be used under certain regulations, legislations.

Under Sect 23 of the Medicine Act 1981 this provides the Minister of Health to grant provisional consent when considered desirable for the medicines to be sold, supplied or used on a restricted basis (LIMITED BASIS) for the treatment of a LIMITED number of patients (People)

June 12^th 2015 The National Library Of Medicine published an article ‘Off-Label drug use as a consent and health regulation issue in New Zealand. ‘Off Label’ described as not yet approved or the status of drugs that have been approved

The NZ Medicines Act 1981 specifically allows for off-label drug use, however this authority is limited-Code of Health & Disability Services Consumers Rights Regulations and Common Law state:- It is required that ‘off-label’ drug use is of an acceptable standard, the patient should be fully informed, the patient must give informed consent.

‘Off Label drug use is an extremely important issue, the current law provides medical practitioner very wide discretionary power without providing classification for what is required of the practitioner in exercising this discretion ’off label’.

SO WHAT HAS THE NZ GOVTS THEREPEUTIC PRODUCTS BILL  GOT TO DO WITH THE REPLACING OF THE MEDICINES ACT WITH ‘OFF LABEL’ MEDICINE?

The Government had unsuccessfully introduced policy proposals for the Therapeutic Content proposals  back in 2011 and 2016. In 2019 the Therapeutic Product proposal was back on the governments table. “Iwi/Maori natural medicines would be exempted from the Therapeutic Product proposal”

A Med-Safe Report in May 2022 refers to the Medicine Act being replaced with the Therapeutic Products Bill to allow for ‘Off Label’ Medicines Chris Hipkins the COVID19 Response Minister and Andrew Little Minister Of Health where the Director General has the ability to make decisions regarding the administration of the COVID19 jabs, the dose and the frequency as the pandemic developed whilst being outside of the established Medsafe Regulations- medicine process.

A legal base for the provision of the medicines process of any further doses of COVID19 Vaccines (Jabs) including Pfizer’s 4^th doses. The 4^th dose had not yet been approved by Med-Safe. The government had recommended that Maori and Pacifika peoples over the age of 50 who are immune-compromised can receive the 4^th Pfizer dose before winter 2022.  NO public consultation was undertaken as to the governments proposal, however the 4^th dose was consistently promoted by mainstream media.

Ministry of Health reported that Pfizer have not yet applied for approval of 4^th dose in NZ, that local jurisdictions have to find their own approval strategies.

2.The Ministry of Health reported as to Maori, Pacific peoples health- cannot be overstated as to the impact of COVID19 that there is a time pressure to maximize immunity when winter illnesses are at their peak. (Specific targeting of Maori and Pacific Island peoples for COVID19 jabs -guineapigs) saying “It would be ideal to enable the broader doses of4th Pfizer doses. Opportunities to administer flu and COVID 19 jabs at the same time.

 To provide their populations with 4^th doses, but they had to find their own legal route.. However Standing Orders cannot be made for an unconsented medicine (A new medicine), this undermines the purpose and consents process under the 1981 Medicines Act

NOTE: Under the Medicines Act 1981 ‘Off Label’ – number of people receiving doses of ‘unapproved Med-Safe medicines are limited. Pfizer COVID19 dose 4 was unapproved and therefore limited as to how many New Zealanders could receive it.

The government ‘WITH URGENCY’ introduced new arrangements, they  were implemented to amend the Medicine Act introduced 7^th June 2022, passed in mid June- recommended by Andrew Little that the Ministry Of Health would be responsible for the implementation of the 4^th dose of Pfizer, utilizing all existing delivery settings, processes & technology that has been used previously for the COVID19 rollout.

Ministry Of Health to monitors new data collection. Andrew Little Minister Of Health will administer the application of the Medicines Act 1981 to ensure ‘off-label’ medicines eg COVID19 Pfizer 4^th Dose practices.( Ria-moh-amat-may.22.pdf)

In a Court hearing-Judge Rebecca Ellis stated when referring of ‘off label’ medicine, “a limited number of people  specified for in Section 23 Medicines Act 1981. This could NOT be stretched to the whole population over 16years old” Andrew Littles response to Judge Ellis was “I will fix the snag” (Intro to the Therapeutic Product Bill)

RNZ reported 18/5/2021 ‘Technical Anomaly Spurs Urgent Law Change for COVID 19 Vaccine. Government URGENTLY’ seek a change of law to ensure COVID19 Vax rollout is LEGAL following the High Court decision of Judge Rebecca Ellis. Judge Ellis ruled it was ‘reasonably argued, that the governments approval of Pfizer vaccine rollout went beyond the Medicines Act 1981 allowed” . This gave  Andrew Little the right to approve medicines for a limited number of patients. However the COVID 19 Vaccine rollout would cover all New Zealanders over the age of 16years. THUS NOT LIMITED AS IN MEDICINE ACT 1981

Chris Hipkins response to Judge Ellis was “this raises no safety issues, it just highlighted a technical anomaly as to the law. NOTE THE GOVERNMENT WAS TECHNICALLY BREAKING THE LAW. AND THEY NEEDED TO COVER THEIR ARSES.

Andrew Little again responded to Judge Ellis “The government will pass legislation under URGENCY to rectify the problems ( THERAPEUTICS PRODUCTS BILL- This will most definitely be passed to save Governments arses)

Six products are potentially affected by Judge Ellis court decision these include Pfizer Vaccines, 2 Flu Vaccines and 2 types of contraceptives and an electrolyte solution

3.On the 30November 2022 the Therapeutic Product Bill was officially introduced by Andrew Little to the House (Parliament). He describes this in his speech in the Beehive “To modernize the way medicines, medical devices (includes COVID Test Kits) and Natural Health products are regulated. Strict rigorous regulations on natural health products eg. Vit C, Vit D etc., etc., you can buy at the supermarket.

The Therapeutic Product Bill if passed replaces the Medicines Act 1981 and the Dietary Supplement Regulation 1985 with one comprehensive  regulatory regime. Andrew Little stated “FIT FOR THE FUTURE’. Enables NZ to take advantages of advances in medicine -gene therapies, AI and machine learning software also vaccines for pandemics. The Therapeutic Product Bill legislation will work alongside, contribute to ‘Pae Ora Health Futures Act’

David Seymour said “Medsafe tended to approve drugs that were approved elsewhere in the world saying “Well, has Medsafe ever declines to approve a drug that the rest of the world is safe”. David Seymour was supporting replacing the Medicine Act 1981 with the Therapeutic Product legislation. He also stated  “the Court were right to uphold the law, however he backs the law change to replace the Medicine Act with the Therapeutic Product Legislation.

As to Judge Rebecca Ellis court outcome David Seymour said “the Court were right to uphold the law, however he backs the law change to replace the Medicine Act with the Therapeutic Product Legislation. National Party COVID19 Minister Chris Bishop said to reporters that National Party support the law change.  .

RNZ Reported 18/5/2021. Technical Anomaly spurs Urgent Law Change. Government urgently seek a change in law to ensure COVID19 Vaccine rollout is LEGAL following a High Court decision. Judge Rebecca Ellis ruled “it was reasonably argued that the government approval of Pfizer Vaccine rollout went beyond the Medicine Act 1981.

NOTE: The Medicine Act 1981 only gave the government the right to approve a limited number of patients, whereas the COVID19 Vaccine Rollout covered everyone in NZ over 16years of age. There are be legal enforcement includes, huge fines, court hearings etc., for those who do not comply to the Therapeutics Legislation (announced Beehive)

SO BASICALLY—THE THERAPEUTICS PRODUCT BILL IS TO SEVERELY RESTRICT  NEW ZEALANDERS ABILITY TO PURCHASE NATURAL HEALTH REMEDIES. FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO COVER ITS ARSE FOR CRIMINALLY BREAKING THE MEDICINES ACT 1981 BY REPLACING THE MEDICINES ACT WITH THE THEREUPEUTIC PRODUCT BILL TO PROMOTE JABS FOR PANDEMICS, MORE HUMAN TRIAL GUINEAPIGS. THE ADVANCEMENT USE OF AI AND GENETIC CELL ADVANCEMENT TRIALS AND DRUGS.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25096169/

https://i.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/300310925/government-to-introduce-a-new-law-for-vaccine-after-legal-challenge

https://www.medsafe.govt.nz/COVID-19/status-of-applications-asp-ria-moh/amat-may22.pdf

 

...

The World Health Assembly (UN) Review Committee on the International Health Regulations 2005 have  been busy putting together proposals for an International  Pandemic Treaty. Helen Clark is a co chair of the Review Committee.  The WHO (UN) International Health Regulations 2005 are binding and lawful in 196 countries includes 194 UN Nation States.  If the proposals as to amendments to the WHO International Health Regulations are introduced they will come into effect immediately and be lawfully binding.  Such provisions shall become effective from the date of receipt of the notification by the Secretary General of the United Nations.

The WHO International Pandemic Treaty  violates the normal process for ratifications of Treaties under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.

Please click on the link within the above image which will take you to my rumble video on this huge concern which will effect all of us.

...

The Contraception, Sterilisation, and Abortion Act Abortion had been a criminal offence in New Zealand since 1866. By the 1970s it had become a deeply divisive social and political issues.

Family First NZ has quickly become a household name, advocating for families, and speaking common sense and values on a broad range of family issues in New Zealand, sharing free information on many topics on family matters particularly around Ardern’s Labour led Relationships and Sexuality Education. Family First NZ bringing awareness to parents of children of what their children are taught in the school curriculum. Warning about school sexuality, gender diversity programmes in schools that involve Mates & Dates, Rainbow Youth and Family Planning Association NZ.

It was during the third Labour Govt that the ‘Little Red Book’ was re-published in New Zealand that caused quite a controversary, then followed by ‘Under the Plum Tree’ at the beginning of the National Govt in 1976. Followed by another book entitled ‘Display Under the Palm Tree’ . The obscenity of sexual language  and images had been targeted at children from 10 years upwards.

Below is some of the informative history of this area which involves sexualization of New Zealand school children:-

The radical Little Red School Book appeared in NZ bookshops prior to 1972, it was published in Denmark in 1969. And republished in other countries also  The book was modelled on Chairman Mao’s cultural revolution led by his youthful red guards in the late 1960’s. The Little Red School Book was aimed at youth-teenagers  worldwide. In England it was published by 27yr old Richard Handy side. The NZ publisher was 28yr old Alister Taylor. He recruited a team of teachers and people within the Education Dept, he claimed a senior inspector to revise the English edition for local consumption (for NZ Youth)

Taylor was a former president of the NZ University Student Assoc., had worked in Nation Radio. Launched his publishing career with LRSB whilst he was chief editor of educational books for A H & A W Reed and a spare editor of the Journal of the Post Primary Teachers Assoc.,. 200 pages of the book dealt with drugs, sex and organizations including Family Planning Clinics, the Abortion Law Reform Assoc and the Homosexual Reform Society

The Little Red School Book was said,  it filled children’s minds with utopian nonsense taking control of children’s minds and children’s lives. 25 pages of the book was on the most objectionable information, that was seen to be likely to harm teenagers, as it encouraged sexual activity. “People who warn you against strong feelings and sex are as a rule afraid of both  of sex and strong feelings and don’t know enough about it. Judge for yourself, from your own experiences. The treatment of sex was about the reduction of intimacy to the level of merely animal activity. Says very little about feelings and informed children ‘The usual word for a boys sexual organ is a pXick or a cXck. A girls sexual organ described as a fXnny or a cXnt. Intercourse as fXcking

2.Children were informed about masturbation, petting various parts of the body including the sexual organs “Can all be caressed with fingers, lips, tongue. If the school will not supply a vending machine, open your own contraceptive shop. That pornography, homosexuality, there are many other forms of family life apart from marriage between a man and woman”. Referred to abortion, pornography, contraceptives

The Police Offences Act had been amended in 1954 to make it illegal to supply contraceptives to young people under the age of 16yrs. Instruction in the use of contraceptives and persuasion to use them remained illegal. By 197- contraceptive education led to the interpretation of the law permitting the ‘giving of information’ about the use of contraceptives to ‘instructing to use’’

The Secretary of Justice submitted the Little Red School Book to the Indecent Publications Tribunal. The tribunal delivered its decision in March 1972 that 50,000 copies of the book had already been sold it was decided the book was NOT indecent. The tribunal was not bothered at the physical side of the book or the dehumanizing effect, in fact they were impressed with some of the book, adolescents were the experimental guineapigs.

SPCS  ( Society  also sent individual letters of appeal and protest for Promotion of Community) fought back questioning the right of the tribunal to pass a book that encouraged breaking the law. Trevor Young MP Eastern Hutt president of the SPCS formerly requested the Minister Of Justice to allow an appeal. Individual members of the SPCS. Alister Taylor the NZ publisher of the book had prepared the market, challenged this saying there was a great need for it, for a wide spread sex education throughout communities, particularly schools. Profits from sales of the book meant that he could make a 2^nd major contribution to the sexual education of children in NZ.

November 1972 the 3^rd Labour Government came to power, the education portfolio went to Phil Amos who was very sympathetic to the sex education lobby. Early 1973 the Director General of Education Bill Renwick appointed a committee of 12 people, the chair person was Mr J A Ross, their task was to draft a discussion paper on health and special education.

The paper was released in December 1973 entitled the ‘Human Development & Relationships in Schools Curriculum, making recommendations, actions to improve the media, to prevent sexual exploitation and outlined the content of the school program proposed for all levels-primary, junior, secondary. That this should include petting and masturbation, contraception, homosexuality and an emphasis on different attitudes to abortion.

Compulsory at all levels. Primary school teachers could talk about the bulk of this (This was called the Ross Report-Feb 1974) There was no provision for parents to withdraw their teenagers from sex education classes. It was said by many at the time that these sex education classes were driving wedges between their children and parents.

1974 a group formed in Christchurch around Christchurch High School. The 1974 NZ Council for Education Research  circulated in every school a British Family Planning comic “To Great A Risk” which illustrated contraceptive methods Christchurch parent groups decided to act. And formed the ‘Concerned Books Assembly’. Sex education plans went ahead against a backdrop 3.of increased opposition activity by the general population. 1972 Family planning had set up ‘Advice Referral Centres’ for youth in Auckland and Christchurch and then extended this to Wellington.

July 1974 The Statutes Revision Committee recommended to Parliament repeal of the Police Offence Act 1954. The Rowling govt did not act on it. Dec 1974 a delegation from SPCS presented a petition containing 27,640 signatures against contraception education. They stressed that sexual activity,  by no means should be introduced into the school system

There was coercion by Family Planning Assoc., personnel and the Sex Magazine ‘FORUM’ subtitled ‘The International Journal of Human Relations  edition of the sexology monthly from the stable of the Penthouse Edition, featured articles, letter on sexual experimentation of all kinds in pursuit of the ‘ultimate turn-on’. The July 1976 issue led with a 4 page article on sodomasochist experiences including an interviews with promiscuous bisexual males boasting 2,000 to 3,000 lovers, letters detailing masturbation, experiments, incest, three some’s, anal sex advice on se

A Dr Robert Chantham on penis enlargement sexology supreme.  And views on incest.  The 1974 issue listed Dr Frazer McDonald, medical supervisor of Carrington Psych Hospital Auckland, Prof James Ritchie dean of the school services.  At Waikato University three other senior academics od psychology and psychiatry, also listed was Isobel Stanton a leading abortion law reform activist, a counsellor of Auckland Abortion Clinic and one of its trustee’s. She later became a member of the govt Abortion supervisory committee.

In the July  publication of ‘FORUM” Margaret Sparrow  of the Abortion Law Reform Assoc and also the Family Planning Assoc’s medical director for Wellington, also International consultants were named in the FORUM issue, this included Ted McIvor member of the Advisory Board of the controversial Sex information and Education Council of the US.

A 1974 Issue of the FORUM namely 75 And Us- US National Sex Forum, involved in the supply of sex films and other materials for sex education and Dr Mahon Potts the medical director of International Planned Parenthood US. International Planned Parenthood and NZ Family Planning Association are affiliated.

The Forum magazine was not subject to customs inspection. Although 4 issues were classified as R18. In the 1970’s Family Planning Association was already receiving significant funding from the government. In 1976 Family Planning Assoc  employed a full time Youth Education Officer whom 10 months earlier had been an editor ofc the FORUM magazine. And was chosen to be in charge of the work done in NZ Schools and FPA clinics. That all seemed ok with the government thought. The Minister Of Education.

The FORUM magazine had been advertised in the journal of the Post Primary Teachers Association on Human Development & Relationships in the schools curriculum. Teachers were suppose to benefit from this pornographic trash, the exploiting on teenagers minds with sexual material full of obscene words.

4.December 1976 Alister Taylor published ‘Under The Plum Tree’ for children aged 10 yrs plus, it included obscene explicit body images and sexual language. Intercourse, anal and oral sex. This caused a public outcry, was sent to the Indecent Publications Tribunal, 100’s of copies had already been sold, the tribunal put 3 months freeze on the sales pending classification Feb 1977 a representative of the Secretary of Justice said the book was an afoot to commonly accepted standards of decency in NZ and asked for a ruling that the book be classified as an R18.

Alister Taylor called expert witnesses to defend the book including Margaret Sparrow and education lecturer and a secondary school teacher Robin Duff who was the coordinator for the campaign for Homosexuality. The classification remained R18 “Indecent in the bands of anyone under the age of 18yrs unless such persons are being instructed by parents or professional advisors.  This opened it up for teachers to be in the guise of professional advisors. The book was not allowed to be kept in the school library otherwise prosecution may occur.

Then came the book ‘ Display Under the Palm Tree’ this was referred to the NZ Police as a result the London Bookshop in Central Wellington was convicted in 1978 for openly exhibiting the book to under age persons. The labour govt of the 1970’s  became under great pressure from within and outside their ranks. The Contraception, Sterilization Abortion Bill entered parliament in August 1977 Part 3 Clause 56 made it mandatory such sexuality courses might be prescribed by regulations under the Education Act. Clause 3 allowed people acting in place of parents- doctors, family planning personal and other people were authorised by the minister of justice to give contraceptives and contraception instruction to children. Clause 60 allowed a girl of any age to be referred for an abortion without parental consent.

To my friends and followers on Social Media l the information I have shared with you is included in a book entitled ‘A Stand For Decency’ by Carolyn Moynihan. Published in 1995. I recently picked this book up at a Lions Monthly Book Fair in Auckland.

‘A Stand For Decency’ refers to Patricia Bartlett and the Society for Promotion of Community Standards 1970-`1995 ‘The Sex Education Debate ‘ Page 54. The SPCS fought long and hard against the obscene language and images that were displayed in certain books that were published to exploit children’s minds by sexual deviancy  and still we continue the fight to stop sexual obscenity out of our schools in NZ.

Thank you to Family First New Zealand for your compassionate continuous efforts in trying to make parents aware of what their children are being taught in schools today –which I  personally believe is sexual abuse,  sexual exploitation by the State.  I urge Parents of school age children to visit the Family First NZ website where extremely valuable information is shared free of charge – I call this ‘Heart Gifts’

PLEASE SHARE, SHARE, SHARE- LINK: Family First NZ     https://familyfirst.org.nz

 

Carol Sakey   https://wakeupnz.org

...

The accuracy of historical figures are questionable due to data quality. I personally believe that data in todays world  is highly questionable due to increased use of the  tiny invisible codes within Algorithms.  One should always question why the male suicide rates are so significantly higher than female. (25^TH March 2022 NZ Parliamentary Website- Suicide in NZ: A Snapshot of recent trends)

It’s reported by parliament that the 2019 to 2021 figures for suspected rates and deaths of suicide- Maori population estimates are from 2020 onwards are unavailable. The numbers and rates of suicide deaths among Maori and Non-Maori populations depend on the ‘standard population’ used to standardise the rates. Standardised rates calculated with a different standard population that are likely to lead to a different rate ratio. Thus caution should be observed when interpreting rates calculated. Different standard populations are not comparable. The populations used to calculate rates for Maori/Non0Maori comparisons are not the same as those used to calculate rates for Maori/Pacific/Asian and other prioritised ethnicity comparisons, (Technical Information) Refers to Govt Suicide Web Tool

The female suicide rates for Asian and Pacific ethnic groups is unreliable because this is based on  small numbers, thus not included. Newshub reports 4/10/2021 that NZ’s Suicide Rate Drops for Second Consecutive Year. Judge Debroral Marshall released the figures to June 30^th 2021 which showed 607 people died by suspected suicide, compared to 628 the year before. Judge Marshall said “Understanding what a change in numbers and rates from one year to the next means is difficult because these numbers can fluctuate considerably.

I question, is this to quieten, silence the voices of those that voiced  serious concern about increased suicide rates during the pandemic, through the stress of significant loss of jobs, businesses, isolation, lockdowns, the sheer upheaval, the dismantling of our environment we have always taken for granted? To be faced with the suicide of a loved one is a extremely traumatic experience in itself. The loss, the anger, shock and isolation and the disempowerment experienced by everyday kiwi’s by a NZ  totalitarian regime. The intense grief, the fear. On top of the loss of a loved one who has taken their own life.

Newshub 2/11/2022 reports Mike King breaks down discussing the latest suicide rates, makes a tearful plea to improve the mental health services in NZ. Mike King has been an absolute warrior, passionately fighting against NZ’s failing mental health system. Mike King saying that the system is f’d up and something needs to be urgently done. Anna Tutton released the June 30^th 2022 figures which showed that 538 people died of suspected suicide down from 607 the year prior. Yes, the system is absolutely f’d up. I agree with Mike King and most NZrs would. He encouraged, urged people to speak up, saying he was fed up of people just saying “I love your posts”. Mike writes about a mum whose child has died, how many more have died, how many suicides not reported. The man’s heart is bleeding, “Just loving Mikes heart rendering posts is not enough”. NZ has the highest youth suicide rate in the OECD. As Mike says we cannot allow the bureaucrats to run our country, and if you think if National gets in things will be different, you are living in la la land.

Mike King was in tears when he said the system is fkd, and no-one is doing anything about it. Mike was doing his usual fundraising events for GumBoot Friday, a charity providing counselling for young people in NZ. In June 2021 Mike returned the NZ Order of Merit he was awarded in 2019 for services to Mental Health Awareness and Suicide Prevention as he cited lack of progress in those areas. This came after repeated criticisms of Arder and the Miniter of Health as to the lack of investment in mental health serviced, and for the rejecting GumBoot Fridays plea for funding to provide free counselling for young people

The  New Zealand Government  I believe is a ‘Regime’.Parliament is like  a ships deck, same people, same deckchairs, but they just move the deckchairs around every now and then. Helen Clark still with her foot in the door, advisign the governmentg on policies, and now Co Chair of the International Pandemic Treaty at the World Health Assembly. (National Control-Global Control all the same to me.. its all about Control)

I believe there is a litany of blatant lies that have been published by successive govts including  Arderns, would be the most extreme litany of lies on the published Suicide Stats. Suicide Stats are collected, published in two different ways. Provisional and Coroners. Coroners Data represents suspected suicides. In order for a death to be legally described as a suicide a coroner must rule that the death was self inflected. Until a case of suspected suicide is officially concluded by investigation, inquest then this is only suspected.

The Govt Te Whatu Ora – Health NZ- Suicide Webtool provides data about confirmed suicide deaths as well as suspected intentionally self-inflicted deaths in NZ. Documents the following:-That Suicide Data is reported by Te Whatu Ora (Govt) and the Chief Corroner. The Chief Coroner releases data on suspected intentionally self-inflicted deaths, also those deaths not yet established if the death was from intentional harm. Te Whatu Ora releases official suicide data comprising of suicide deaths that have been confirmed by the Chief Coroner in addition to deaths provisionally coded as suicide.  Provisional could be self inflicted and may not have been. Provisional Coding practices are not factual evidence

IN NZ a death is only classified as suicide by the coroner on completion of the coroners inquiry. If an inquest takes place can take several years after the death. Consequently a provisional suicide classification maybe made before the coroner reaches a verdict whether it was suicide or not. The Ministry Of Health figures for suicide are determined by the coroner. It has been publicised that those grieving for the loss of a loved ones,  due to suspicion of a loved one, family member taking of  their own life -Suiciding have been unable to move on at all with their lives even years later due to the final conclusion of investigation of coroners reports in NZ.

Stuff NZ reported 31^st January 2021 ‘Grieving families five year waits for coroners reports – a national scandal’. Families having to wait on a knifes edge for years as the time for coroners take to investigate sudden deaths balloon 25% per years. Families waiting 2-3-4-5years. Such as huge emotional burden delays can have financial consequences on loved ones left behind too. This is shocking these people who are grieving stuck with no means of closure. (Thus the Coroners Office nor Te Whatu Ors (Govt) can publish factual suicide numbers- they are fudged)

May 2019 the Government announced funding for 8 additional part time coroners, but in 2020  six long term coroners resigned, one time coroners still had to be replaced. A mum from Northland had been waiting for 2 yrs 7 months for a coroners reports on the suspected suicide of her 15year old daughter, she had sadly passed away in June 2018. Every day checking the mail, constantly on my mind she said “I can’t move forward”. The unbearable pain of losing your child one can only imagine unless its happened to you. To wake up, go to bed each night without your child. Being stuck in limbo, cannot go through the grieving process. Carrying this huge mountain of grief.

Chief Coroner Judge Deborah Marshall acknowledged the stress of the next to kin, saying all coroners have a backlog of cases impacted by a record number in 2018-2019 (3792) which included the 51 deaths caused by the Christchurch gunman. Plus the resignation of 6 coroners.

NOTE closure of investigations, inquiries into suspected suicides 877 days those going to inquest take up to 1,451 days from the time of death. Provisional equates to ‘Suspected’ cases of suicide fluctuate can eventually be determined as self inflicted (Suicide) or Not Self Inflicted. Yet still reported. (Evidence of factual suicide  becomes Non-evidential) Not Factual Data.  Suicide data of intentionally self inflicted deaths were extracted from the Ministry Of Justice case Management System on 27^th July 2022. Confirmed suicide data was extracted from Te Whatu Ora Mortality Collection (MORT) 27/7/2022. 169 deaths were awaiting final outcomes for 2018

Stats based on numbers published should be interpreted with caution. Understanding trends in rates is only possible over a period of 5-10yrs or even longer in a smaller population. There is a different coding classification for death by poisoning, is coded as an accident or an intent to harm, accidental death by poisoning rather than undetermined intent. Thus can lead, and will have lead to false information on suicides being published, an overstatement of deaths by accidental poisons.

Demographic Information was unable to be sourced from the Te Whatu Mortality Collection (Govt), 65 records did not have a death registration record. The majority of these cases were from May 2021 and onwards.

World Health Org (UN) Standard World Population standards are used in NZ for difference in rates for example the ratio of suicides in Maori and Non-Maori populations, this is dependent on the standard populations which is significantly a different ratio. The Govt website Te Whatu Ora cautions  that using different standard populations because they are not comparable to collaborate ratio’s for Maori and Non-Maori. Used to calculate rates for Maori/Pacific/Asian and others prioritises ethnicities this may be different when it comes to the Maori population estimates sourced from Stats NZ (Govt) Population estimates are supplied to Te Whatu Ora (Govt) as customized data sets for Stats NZ. (Using estimates where possible) Stats NZ raised their population estimates back to 2006 based on info published in 2018 rates.

Referring to Confidence-Intervals-Statistical Significance. Thus specifying uncertainty around a single value to estimate a true value .. A Legal Fiction in other words. The underlying untruths as to reported Suicide Stats in NZ. Where different estimated rates could be used by chance, thus lead to a different set of data, used to compare groups of data. Calculations are assumed, predicted.. suspected…

Investigating key models with using ‘quasi-Poisson’ distribution, this is used to determine suicide rates for the latest suicide data in NZ, where suicide rates can be highly variable, significantly different. The main problem appears to be with ‘Quasi Poisson’ is that there is no corresponding likelihood for it, hence a lot of extremely useful statistical, test, fit and measurements are unavailable thus making strong assumptions regarding the distribution of the underlying data. That caution should be observed using different standard populations because they are not comparable populations. The World Health Org., Standard Populations . Standard Population Data for use in Statistical software.

The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Global Burden of Disease study estimate that almost 800,000 people die from suicide every year. One person every 40 seconds. That’s an estimation. (a rough calculation of the value, number, quantity, or extent of something:)

Newshub reports 5^th February 2022 Mates In Construction calls for more to be done to address suicide rate among construction workers. d Mates in Construction is building awareness and teaching preventative measures on work sites. The group’s research shows workers under the age of 24 and between the ages of 45-49 are particularly at risk. “We’re losing about a builder a week,” says Lee.

RNZ reported 1^st Nov 2019 ‘Ringing up Tears’ Canterbury farmers doing it tought’ Farmers across NZ are all doing it tough, as Arderns Regime continues to throw farmers under their own tractors, using them as the govts whipping boy. Back I Nov 2019 Farmers were saying they are at breaking point. Suicide rates in 2019 up 17% in rural areas. Farmers battling depression. Young guys in tears they are about to lose the family farm handed down to them from one generation to another. The huge amounts of audits, compliances they have to deal with. Environment Minister David Parker said its wrong to  attribute mental health increases to environmental policy. Scoop News Reports 10^th Sept 2020. The reality of farmer suicides and mental illness in rural NZ is something that needs to be confronted said a Ruawai farmers. Saying he had sadly buries his friends from the rural community who did not get the support, help they needed. And Arderns Govt on the 30^th November 2022 sets out on its next steps again targeting farmers. Transitional arrangement in place by 2025 referencing Farm Carbon Sequestration. The Great Carbon Capture Scam.. Huge profit making, swindling money from public purses there is no moral compass, the destruction of livilhoods

The Oil Industry, Shell, Chevron and others have no intention of zero emissions, this is an illusion.. as their profiteering came up with carbon capture. The UN IPSS enable this scam, IPCC Climate Models requiring Carbon Capture and Storage to balance carbon books at some time in the not to be seen future. The Global Elite are determining our countries future, they are also determining the stress levels put on farmers, the loss of livelihoods, of jobs and small businesses, family fragmentation. NZ Govt a regime, a two tiered Marxist socialist dictatorship that cruelly renders the most vulnerable feeling totally disempowered. Of course Suicides are on the rise significantly so. You have all been told a litany of lies with corrupted data, fear mongering debilitating the good people of NZ.

Mike King he has passionately given of himself over many years now, no wonder he feels so grieved that this Marxist Socialist NZ Regime has become so immoral and corrupt, turning its back on its own people who are suffering emotionally, mentally, physically and spiritually. Thank you Mike King for your passionate call to wake up New Zealand to our country’s seriously failing mental health system and to the many, many people who are in grief and suffering in our country.

I Conclude that I believe that the published stats on the suicide gigures in New Zealand are seriously flawed. That they are indeed much significantly higher than reported.

https://wakeupnz.org  Carol Sakey

LINKS:

The Great Carbon Capture Scam | Red, Green, and Blue (redgreenandblue.org)

Understanding suicide in New Zealand | Ministry of Health NZ

Suicide web tool – Te Whatu Ora – Health New Zealand

Suicide in New Zealand: A snapshot of recent trends – New Zealand Parliament (www.parliament.nz)

...