TRANSFORMING OUR LIVES 2030 (THE GLOBAL AGENDA) – THE PRINCIPLE =LEAVING NO-ONE BEHIND

Stakeholder Capitalism, the UN’s Sustainable Development Goal target 16.9 (legal identity for all), the necessity of inclusive Digital Transformation, and the core principle of Leave No One Behind.

These terms are frequently used by international organizations (such as the UN and World Bank) and private sector entities in discussions about sustainable and equitable global development in the digital age.

Key Concepts

Leave No One Behind (LNOB): This is the “central, transformative promise” of the UN’s 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. It is an unequivocal commitment to eradicate poverty, end discrimination, and reduce inequalities, focusing on the most marginalized populations first. This principle is meant to cut across all 17 SDGs.

SDG 16.9: This specific target under SDG 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions) aims to “provide legal identity for all, including birth registration, by 2030”. A legal identity is considered a fundamental human right and a prerequisite for accessing many other rights and services (healthcare, education, finance, voting, social protection), making it a key enabler for the entire 2030 Agenda.

Digital Transformation: The rapid shift towards a digitally enabled society offers immense opportunities for sustainable development but also risks exacerbating existing inequalities if not implemented thoughtfully. International bodies advocate for “inclusive by design” digital transformation strategies that place people and human rights at the center to ensure that vulnerable populations are not excluded from new digital services and opportunities.

Stakeholder Capitalism Partnership: This concept involves a business model where companies focus not just on shareholder value but also on meeting the needs of all stakeholders (employees, customers, suppliers, local community, and the environment). Literature suggests that this approach can foster global partnerships and provide an optimal source for promoting decent work, economic growth, and innovation in a sustainable manner, aligning with the SDGs.

Interconnection The provided phrase connects these elements as a framework for inclusive global progress:

  1. Stakeholder Capitalism Partnership approach is seen as a way to mobilize resources and bring together different actors (governments, private sector, civil society).
  2. This collaborative effort would drive a worldwide Digital Transformation that is intentionally designed to be inclusive.
  3. A core objective of this digital transformation is to achieve SDG 16.9 (legal identity for all), often by leveraging digital identity systems.
  4. The ultimate goal of all these intertwined efforts is to uphold the promise to Leave No One Behind in the digital era.

n 2025, the intersection of Stakeholder CapitalismSDG 16.9 (Legal Identity), and Digital Transformation has become a critical focal point for global development efforts aimed at ensuring no one is left behind.

Global Strategy and Progress 2025

SDG 16.9 and Legal Identity: As of 2025, approximately 850 million people worldwide still lack official identification, a fundamental barrier to accessing health, education, and financial services.

Leave No One Behind (LNOB): This remains the central promise of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, focusing on reaching the “furthest behind first” to eradicate poverty and systemic discrimination.

Digital Transformation as a Lever: The UN and its partners have identified digital transformation as one of six critical transitions needed to accelerate SDG progress by 2030.

Key 2025 Partnerships and Initiatives

Stakeholder Capitalism & Business Action: The World Economic Forum (WEF) hosted the Sustainable Development Impact Meetings 2025 in September to convene business leaders and policymakers on digital trade and inclusive growth.

Identification for Development (ID4D): The World Bank’s ID4D cross-practice initiative continues to support countries in implementing digital ID systems to achieve the SDG 16.9 target.

UN System-Wide Efforts: The 2025 ECOSOC Partnership Forum utilized global stakeholder consultations to harness the power of multi-sector partnerships for SDG implementation.

The SDG 16 Conference 2025 (held May 12, 2025) focused on how investing in peace, justice, and institutions delivers practical dividends for governments and people.

Risks and Challenges in 2025

  • Digital Exclusion: Experts warn that rushing digital solutions without robust legal frameworks can inadvertently “lock out” vulnerable groups, making them “invisible” to governments.
  • Data Protection & Privacy: Ensuring data protection alongside digital identity is a major challenge; misuse of biometric data remains a grave risk for marginalized populations.
  • Funding Gaps: Official Development Assistance (ODA) saw its first decline in five years in late 2024/early 2025, primarily due to shifting global priorities and debt crises in low-income countries.
  • In 2025, programmable and multi-functional digital identification systems have moved from theory to widespread practical implementation across several nations. These systems allow users to selectively share attributes, sign documents, and access integrated government and private services directly through mobile applications.
  • Countries with Active Systems (2025)
  • Bhutan
  • : In February 2025,
  • Bhutanintroduced its National Digital Identity (NDI), which uses self-sovereign identity (SSI) technology. By October 2025, key parts of the system were anchored to the public Ethereum blockchain, allowing residents to manage credentials for over 40 services, including banking and healthcare.
  • India
  • : The Aadhaar system, covering 97% of the population, has evolved in 2025 with a new mobile app that allows for offline verification via QR codes and face authentication. It is used for “programmable” benefits delivery, where subsidies are sent directly to bank accounts linked to digital IDs.
  • South Korea
  • : Launched a digital Resident Registration Card in 2025 that uses blockchain and encryption. It fully replaces physical cards for mobile banking and is tied to a specific smartphone for security; if the device is lost, the ID can be deactivated immediately via a telecom provider.
  • Brazil
  •  continues to expand its blockchain-based digital ID program, which began in 2023. This decentralized system links the Federal Revenue Service with state databases, ensuring data protection and preventing document fraud across all 27 states.
  • European Union (Member States):
  • Estonia
  • : A long-term leader, Estonia’s e-ID allows for digital signatures that are legally binding across the EU. As of 2025, it is transitioning toward the EUDI Wallet.
  • Austria
  •  & 
  • Spain
  • : Both launched or expanded mobile ID systems (ID Austria and MiDNI) in 2025, allowing citizens to store driver’s licenses and national IDs on smartphones for online and offline use.
  • Poland
  • : Over 8 million citizens use the mObywatel app, which is now legally equivalent to physical ID cards for most daily activities.
  • Emerging “Programmable” Features in 2025
  • Selective Disclosure: New systems in
  • China
  •  (launched July 2025) and the EU (EUDI Wallet pilots) allow users to verify specific attributes—such as being over 18—without revealing their full name or date of birth.
  • Conditional Access: The
  • United Kingdom
  •  announced a nationwide Digital ID in September 2025, which will become mandatory for employment by 2029.
  • Cross-Border Interoperability: In September 2025, 16 southern African countries (SADC) announced a regional cross-border digital ID infrastructure to enable federated e-KYC (Know Your Customer) for banking and payments.

In 2025, Programmable Digital Identification refers to identity systems where the credentials are not just static records but can interact with software (such as smart contracts) to automate actions based on verified identity attributes.

Key Features of Programmable ID in 2025

Smart Contract Integration: Digital IDs are increasingly tied to Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) and other digital assets. This allows “programmable money” to be released only when specific identity conditions are met, such as age verification or residency status.

Selective Disclosure: Users can “program” their ID to share only the minimum necessary data—for example, proving they are over 18 without revealing their actual date of birth or name.

Conditional Access: Access to services can be automated. For instance, a digital wallet can automatically unlock a rental car or a hotel room as soon as it cryptographically verifies the user’s booking and identity.

Machine-to-Machine ID: In 2025, “identity” has expanded to include IoT devices and AI agents, which use programmable credentials to authorize autonomous transactions.

Implementation by Country (2025 Status)

Bhutan: In October 2025, Bhutan’s National Digital Identity (NDI) anchored its credentials to the public Ethereum blockchain, making it the first national-scale system to use a public ledger for programmable identity verification.

United Arab Emirates: Recognized as the global leader in digitalization in 2025, the UAE uses the UAE Pass to allow citizens to sign documents and access 3,000+ services with a single, programmable biometric login.

European Union: In 2025, member states are rolling out the European Digital Identity (EUDI) Wallet, which allows citizens to store and “program” the use of diplomas, driver’s licenses, and IDs for cross-border services.

India: The Aadhaar mobile app (updated in 2025) now supports offline verification via QR codes and face authentication, enabling “programmable” interactions with private sector services without constant central database queries.

United Kingdom: In September 2025, the UK announced the “Brit Card,” a mandatory app-based system aimed for full rollout by 2029 to simplify interactions with healthcare and welfare.

Emerging 2025 Trends

Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI): A shift toward users owning their data on their own devices rather than in a central government “honeypot” database.

Liveness Detection: To combat AI-generated deepfakes, 2025 systems now mandate 3D face scans and micro-movement tracking as standard for “programmable” remote verification.

Continuous Multi-Factor Verification (MFV): Systems no longer just verify you at login; they continuously monitor behavior and device signals throughout a session to ensure the identity remains valid.

The World Bank Group, primarily through its Identification for Development (ID4D) initiative, actively supports the implementation of digital identification systems in developing countries but focuses on inclusive, secure, and interoperable systems rather than explicitly “programmable” ones in the commercial sense of smart contracts. Its focus is on using digital ID as a platform for service delivery and financial inclusion, guided by the 10 Principles on Identification for Sustainable Development to ensure data protection and privacy.

World Bank’s Approach to Digital ID

Goal: The ID4D initiative aims to provide a unique legal identity for all by 2030 (SDG 16.9), with over 800 million people worldwide still lacking official ID as of late 2025.

Focus on Service Delivery: The World Bank views digital ID as an enabler for essential services such as social protection, healthcare, and financial access, especially for the poor and disadvantaged. The integration of these services into a broader “service stack” or Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) allows for more efficient and automated service delivery, which shares characteristics with the functionality of “programmable” systems.

Technology & Standards: The Bank promotes the use of biometrics and digital databases to replace paper-based systems, ensuring systems are robust, interoperable, and conform to an overall standards-based architecture.

Data Protection & Rights: The World Bank emphasizes the need for strong legal frameworks, data security, and privacy protection, and provides guidelines for policymakers to consider as they modernize their ID systems.

“Programmable” Aspects within the ID4D Framework..While the World Bank does not use the term “programmable” in official documentation in the context of commercial smart contracts, the systems it helps implement have the functionality to automate conditional service delivery:

G2Px Initiative: ID4D works closely with its sister initiative, G2Px (digitalizing government to person payments), to facilitate the direct and efficient transfer of benefits to individuals’ bank accounts linked to their digital ID, a “programmable” benefit delivery in function. In Thailand, for example, linking digital IDs to bank accounts allowed for rapid distribution of emergency cash assistance.

Conditional Access: The ID systems supported in countries like Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire are designed to facilitate linkages with national social registries and health insurance programs to ensure improved targeting of various social programs.

Criticisms .The World Bank’s ID4D program has faced criticism from civil society organizations regarding the potential for human rights violations. Concerns include:

The promotion of potentially harmful models of digital ID systems that use centralized, biometric data collection.

Instances where poorly implemented ID systems have reportedly led to the exclusion and disenfranchisement of marginalized populations, as alleged with the Aadhaar system in India.

A call for greater transparency and independent, rights-based assessments of the World Bank’s role in supporting these systems.

The World Bank Group and the Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) are involved in digital ID and currency discussions but maintain distinct approaches regarding “programmable” features.

World Bank Group & ID4D Initiative..The World Bank, through its ID4D initiative, supports developing countries in creating inclusive, secure, and interoperable digital identification systems.

Focus: The primary goal is achieving SDG 16.9 (legal identity for all by 2030) and using ID as a platform to deliver essential services like social protection, healthcare, and finance.

“Programmable” Functionality: While not using the explicit term “programmable ID” in the commercial smart contract sense, the systems they help implement enable automated, conditional service delivery (e.g., G2Px payments), which is functionally similar to programmable benefits distribution.

Principles: The initiative is guided by the 10 Principles on Identification for Sustainable Development, emphasizing data protection, privacy, and the minimization of risks like social exclusion.

 

Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ)

The RBNZ is exploring a potential Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), referred to as “Digital Cash,” but has explicitly stated it will not program the money itself.

No “Programmable Money”: The RBNZ has clarified that it will not place limitations or constraints on how the digital cash can be used (e.g., expiry dates or restrictions on spending location).

Programmable Payments: Instead, the RBNZ aims to enable a system where third parties (fintechs, banks, etc.) can build innovative “programmable payments” on top of the digital cash platform. This would allow users to set up automated, conditional transfers (e.g., an automatic rent payment via smart contract), giving users control over their money, similar to automatic payments today.

Privacy and Control: A key design principle for New Zealand’s potential Digital Cash is privacy. The RBNZ has emphasized that neither it nor the government would be able to see an individual’s transactions or collect personal data.

New Zealand’s Digital ID Framework: New Zealand’s wider digital identity framework is governed by the Digital Identity Services Trust Framework Act 2023, administered by the Department of Internal Affairs (DIA). This framework focuses on secure, voluntary, and private digital credentials (wallets) that the user controls, rather than a central government-operated tracking system.

There is no formal partnership between the World Bank and the RBNZ specifically for a “programmable digital ID” or currency. The RBNZ’s work on digital cash and the DIA’s work on the digital ID framework are separate from the World Bank’s ID4D initiative, which primarily assists developing nations.

The term “China’s scorecard” most commonly refers to its national social credit system, which rates citizens and businesses on a scale of trustworthiness based on their behavior. The related but distinct digital identification system, officially known as the “Cyberspace ID” system, uses digital technology to link online activity to real-life identities, which complements the social credit system and allows for enhanced state control and surveillance.

China’s Social Credit System (The “Scorecard”)

Function: The social credit system assigns individuals and entities a score, typically ranging from 350 to 950 in pilot programs, which influences their access to various services and privileges.

Behavior Monitoring: The system tracks a wide range of actions, including financial responsibility, compliance with laws (e.g., traffic rules), and general social behavior like littering.

Rewards and Punishments:

High Scores (Rewards): Benefits may include cheaper loans, discounts on travel, and easier access to government services.

Low Scores (Punishments): Consequences can be severe, such as travel bans (being barred from trains or flights), denial of loans or mortgages, public shaming, and exclusion of children from top schools.

Goal: The government presents the system as a way to enhance trust in society and encourage better citizenship.

China’s Digital Identification System:-

Function: Rolled out nationally in July 2025, this system provides a unique, encrypted alphanumeric ID and a digital certificate to internet users after real-name and facial verification.

Integration with Surveillance: The digital ID system allows authorities to link online activities directly to a person’s national monitoring systems, effectively eroding online anonymity, which had already been curtailed by “real-name” registration laws.

Official Rationale vs. Concerns:-

Official Rationale: Authorities claim the system protects citizens’ personal information from data leaks and fraud by minimizing the data shared with private platforms.

Concerns: Human rights groups and analysts express serious concerns that the system is a centralized tool for mass surveillance and censorship, threatening online expression and potentially creating a “honeypot” of data vulnerable to massive leaks.

Status: While authorities maintain that the use of the Cyberspace ID is currently voluntary, some analysts warn it could become de facto mandatory due to its integration with major platforms like WeChat and Taobao.

IN 2025…CHINA’S  “scorecard” is primarily represented by its Social Credit System, which is now increasingly integrated with a centralized National Cyberspace ID. This digital infrastructure allows the state to track behaviors and apply “programmable” consequences—both rewards and punishments—based on an individual’s digital score.

The National Cyberspace ID System (Launched July 2025) On July 15, 2025, China officially implemented a unified digital identity system designed to centralize online authentication.

  • Encrypted Identifiers: Users are issued a “network number” (a unique alphanumeric code) and a “network credential”.
  • Centralized Control: Administered by the Ministry of Public Security and the Cyberspace Administration of China, this system replaces the need to provide personal data to private platforms like WeChat or Taobao.
  • Elimination of Anonymity: While marketed as a privacy tool, critics note it effectively links every online action—posts, purchases, and logins—directly to a government-controlled profile, ending any remaining online anonymity.

Programmable “Scorecard” Functions

The system functions as a programmable scorecard by linking behaviors to real-world access through the Social Credit System:

Behavioral Tracking: The system monitors actions such as shopping habits, social media interactions, and even jaywalking.

Dynamic Consequences:

High Scores: Citizens with high scores can access perks like cheaper loans, travel deals, and priority service.

Low Scores/Blacklisting: Low scores can lead to being barred from high-speed trains, planes, or luxury hotels, and can even prevent children from enrolling in top schools.

Real-Time Enforcement: The digital ID can be programmed to instantly block access to services if a user’s behavior is deemed “anti-social” or non-compliant with state rules.

Key Components of the Digital Infrastructure:-

Biometric Integration: The system relies heavily on facial recognition and national population data for verification.

Digital Yuan (e-CNY): China continues to expand its programmable digital currency, which can be restricted to specific types of purchases or geographic areas, further enhancing the “programmable” nature of citizen control.

Corporate Partnerships: Major platforms like Alibaba and Tencent are integrated into the system to facilitate state-led identity verification.

https://thehill.com/opinion/technology/5512706-china-internet-id-law/#:~:text=The%20digital%20ID%20system%20also,sensitive%20biometric%20records%20in%202022.

In this photo taken Thursday, Nov. 15, 2018, a computer screen shows the leaked online post from Guilin University of Electronic Technology warning of “hostile domestic and foreign powers” that were “wantonly spreading illicit and illegal videos” through the internet in Beijing, China. (AP Photo/Ng Han Guan)

On July 15, China passed new legislation known as the National Network Identity Authentication, also called Internet ID. Under this new law, Chinese citizens would voluntarily enroll via a government app, submitting their true name and a facial scan, after which they would be issued a unique ID code used for all online accounts. As of May, approximately 6 million individuals had already obtained IDs during the pilot phase.

Based upon the nature of the control the Chinese Communist Party has over media and censorship, it is not surprising the Chinese government desires the ability to track its population during their internet sessions, especially those citizens who would be critical of the current regime or dissidents that are living outside mainland China.

The new Internet ID law expands on an ongoing digital authoritarianism agenda pursued by China in recent years. Already, the Chinese government has demonstrated its growing capacity and willingness to monitor its citizens’ online activities.

From the widespread usage of internet backbone filtering through the “Great Firewall” to the mandatory real-name registration implemented since 2010, Beijing has increasingly restricted avenues for anonymous speech online. The new ID system is designed to further tighten the government’s grip on cyberspace at an individual level.

This law would enable the Chinese government, enabled by the new digital ID system, to centralize user identities in a government-controlled database, allowing authorities to track which user fronts which online account, even if platforms only see the anonymized token. This approach applies nation-state censorship in a more individualized way and introduces the possibility that content may be filtered or platforms blocked for certain users, both within China, where the government manages internet access, and potentially on a broader scale.

It could allow the Chinese government to use filters and blocking mechanisms within a platform to limit access to certain services associated with a personalized digital ID for specific individuals. While the legislation claims to be voluntary at launch, many fear that adoption could gradually become mandatory. In China’s regulatory environment, the “voluntary” label has frequently functioned as a transitional stage before compulsory enforcement.

Authorities have encouraged social media giants, e-commerce platforms and even payment providers to begin integrating the Internet ID into their user authentication flows. If access to essential digital services becomes dependent on possession of this ID, individuals may find their ability to function online is effectively contingent upon submitting their biometric and personal data to the state.

This law is just the next step in China’s desire for digital authoritarianism, enhancing the government’s ability to surveil, monitor, shape and control a population down to the individual citizen level.  The digital ID system also complements other previously designed surveillance systems, such as Sharp Eyespolice cloud systemsfacial recognition closed-circuit television systems and grid-style social management, allowing the Chinese Ministry of State Security to link online activities directly into national monitoring systems.

The digital ID system also complements broader data-localization and true-name tracking policies first enacted in 2017 under the Cybersecurity Law and fortified under the Personal Information Protection Law of 2021.

The Chinese government will argue that the system protects its citizens from fraud or other cyber-related crimes and is voluntary, but that voluntary argument fails the reality test, based upon mandatory aspects of previous digital legislation. This new digital ID system erodes the anonymity already curtailed by China’s real-name registration laws from 2010.

The other cybersecurity risk that a centralized database creates is the one-stop honeypot of data that, if compromised, could be catastrophic to the Chinese population, not unlike the past leaks of over 1 billion sensitive biometric records in 2022. Looking ahead, the introduction of China’s Internet ID is a decisive move further away from digital anonymity, putting powerful surveillance and censorship tools in the hands of the authorities.

If history is a guide, this technology may not remain voluntary for long. Its effects on privacy, civil liberties and the freedom of expression within and beyond China’s borders could be profound. As more platforms adopt mandatory digital ID checks, Chinese citizens face an even more controlled and surveilled internet for years to come.

James Turgal is the former executive assistant director for the FBI Information and Technology Branch and Optiv Security’s vice president of cyber risk, strategy and board relations.

Tags china Internet ID Chinese government Great Firewall Sharp Eyes

 

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/world/564790/china-tightens-internet-controls-with-new-centralised-form-of-virtual-id

China tightens internet controls with new centralised form of virtual ID  21 June 2025

China has mastered the craft of policing the internet, operating one of the world’s most extensive online censorship and surveillance regimes. With mandatory identity checks on every online platform, it has become almost impossible for users to stay anonymous. But this rigidly moderated online environment is about to face even stricter controls with the introduction of a state-issued national internet ID.

Instead of requiring individuals to submit their personal information for identity checks separately on each platform, the government now seeks to centralise the process by issuing a virtual ID that will allow users to sign in across different social media apps and websites. The rules for the new system, currently voluntary, were released in late May and will be implemented in mid-July. It aims to “protect citizens’ identity information, and support the healthy and orderly development of the digital economy,” according to the published rules.

Experts, however, have raised concerns that the new policy will further erode already limited freedom of expression by forcing internet users to relinquish even more control to the state.

Since Chinese leader Xi Jinping took power in 2012, the country has further tightened its grip on the digital space through an army of censors. Deployed around the clock, they remove posts, suspend accounts and help authorities identify critics, quashing any sign of dissent before it can gain traction.

The finalised rules were announced after a proposal that was opened for public comment last summer, a typical step in China’s legislative process. During the course of the public consultation over the past year, the proposal faced backlash from law professors, human rights experts and some internet users. Yet, the finalised rules remained largely similar to the draft.

“This is a state-led, unified identity system capable of real-time monitoring and blocking of users,” said Xiao Qiang, a research scientist studying internet freedom at the University of California, Berkeley. “It can directly erase voices it doesn’t like from the internet, so it’s more than just a surveillance tool – it is an infrastructure of digital totalitarianism.”

Control of China’s vast portion of the global internet has largely been delegated to a decentralised range of different groups, with authorities relying partially on the social media platforms themselves to identify comments deemed problematic. Xiao warned that a centralised system using the internet ID could make it much easier for the government to wipe out a user’s presence across multiple platforms at once.

Shane Yi, a researcher at China Human Rights Defenders, an advocacy group, echoed Xiao’s worries. The system gives the Chinese government expanded power to “do what they want when they see fit” on the internet, as authorities are able to track users’ entire digital trail “from point zero,” she said.

At home, Chinese state-run media has called the internet ID a “bullet-proof vest for personal information” and touted the system as being able to greatly reduce the risk of personal data leaks. Already, more than six million people have registered for the ID, according to Chinese state-run media Xinhua last month, out of a total estimated online population of more than one billion.

A cybersecurity official from the Ministry of Public Security told Xinhua that the internet ID service was strictly “voluntary,” but the government encourages various industries and sectors to integrate with it. “Its goal is to provide individuals with a secure, convenient, authoritative and efficient means of identity verification, in support of the development of the digital economy,” the person was quoted as saying.

But experts have also questioned how voluntary the system truly is and highlighted risks of potential data breaches, as personal information is now being collected in a centralised manner. Haochen Sun, a law professor at the University of Hong Kong, said that, although the law presents the system as voluntary, it could gradually evolve into a system which users may struggle not to opt in to.

“If the government wants to promote this internet ID verification system, it can do so through various arrangements – essentially by encouraging people to adopt it, offering more conveniences in return,” he said. Sun also raised concerns about the increased risks of data leaks. “A centralized, nationwide platform inherently creates a single point of vulnerability, making it an attractive target for hackers or hostile foreign actors,” he said.

Government data breaches have occurred around the world. One notable incident in China involved a police database containing the personal information of one billion citizens being leaked online in 2022.

Criticism silenced..Although the new rules won’t take effect until mid-July, hundreds of apps started trialling the internet ID since last year.

The system was born out of a proposal by a police official early last year. Jia Xiaoliang, a cyber police deputy director in northeastern China who is also a delegate to China’s rubber-stamp legislature, the National People’s Congress, first proposed the system during the Congress’ annual meeting in March 2024.

As soon as the government began soliciting public comments on the proposal last July, experts and legal scholars voiced opposition. Lao Dongyan, a prominent law professor at Tsinghua University, compared the system to “installing a surveillance device on every individual’s online activity” in a post on Weibo, an X-like Chinese social media platform.

The post was removed soon after, and her account was subsequently suspended from posting for three months, for “violating relevant rules.”

In late May, when the finalised rules were unveiled after a year, almost no criticism could be found online. Xiao explained that it’s not the first time authorities have spaced out the time between a proposal and its implementation, to allow critics to “blow off steam.” “It’s done deliberately … Many of their measures follow the same pattern, and they’ve proven effective,” he said. 

By John Liu, for CNN

WakeUpNZ

RESEARCHER Cassie

...

Global Governance Blog Posts View all Categories

ONLY A FEW WEEKS TO THE GENERAL ELECTION LABOUR SIGNS UN AGREEMENT ‘AGAIN ANOTHER INTERNATIONAL SECRET DEAL the PUBLIC ARE UNAWARE OF’

We the people need to drain the swamp again another UN Agreement signed by the Labour Party only a few weeks before the General Election. I question how legal is this when Parliament has already broken up and resumes by different parties, hopefully when Parliament reopens..??

Daily Telegraph NZ 22nd September 2023 reported Winston accuses Mahuta of breaking constitutional convention over UN Agenda 2030 Agreement signing.

Nanaia Mahuta has signed the ‘Beyond Biodiversity National Jurisdiction Agreement (BBNJ) at the UN in New York on 21st September 2023. Winston Peters has accused her of breaking the ‘caretaker government’ constitutional convention in signing the international UN agreement. This agreement is part of the accelerated push across the world of the UN Agenda 2030 Global Development Goals (SDGs). To manage at lease 30% of the worlds terrestrial and inland water area by the year 2030. Parliament has already risen and its less than 2 weeks from when early voting begins which is the 2nd October 2023. This should have been left for the next government to deal with. Mahuta when interviewed said she was doing this on behalf of Aotearoa New Zealand. Wrong the name of our country is still officially New Zealand you will not find Aotearoa on the world map. The dirty tricks of Labour, this UN Agreement is open for signatures for another two years, but she chose to do this just before the election

Why would you ever trust those behind the closed doors of Parliament, of course they all knew about this, but they all kept it secret from the public eye, until it was signed. There you have it, this means that UN approval will be required when it comes to shipping and deep sea mining, all activity on the high seas. This also means the inclusion of a diverse range of voices beyond UN Nation States (Beyond New Zealand) The BBNJ is legally binding under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). This was agreed upon under the Kunming-Montreal Global Diversity Framework in December 2022.

The Kunming Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework was adopted at COP15 it represented the most ambitious global agreement on biodiversity in the history of environmental governance, serves as the worlds framework for actions taken at all levels as to worldwide biodiversity. This has extensive provisions as well as reference to ‘survey activities, prospecting, exploitation in relation to seabed mining. The implementing of sustainability and blue economic objectives. The agreement Mahuta signed is interlinked with the SDG’s of Agenda 2030, namely to contribute to the realization of the ASDGs learning opportunities (SDG4) gender equality (SDG5), sustainable economic growth (SDG8 and climate action (SDG 13), Oceans (SDG14) All Global Goals.

Agenda 2030 Target 14.C aims to enhance the conservation sustainable use of the oceans and their resources by implementing this international law under the Convention, with international efforts on the attainment of the SDGs by using science, education and gender empowerment as drivers for this one world global transformation. The UN Agreement Mahuta provides a legal basis for partnerships with the private sector and holders of traditional knowledge. Drives a codification of new norms.

The Global Biodiversity Frameworks refers to ‘valuing nature after COP 15, systems, policy, action. The key takeaways include- Giving corporate sectors an economic reason to act in support of the GDF objectives. Where Nature is essential to the global economy, in accounting systems and corporations etc.,  Today there are Public/Private asset classes that offer ‘nature positive investments’. Leaders of Governments help scale up so called sustainable investments by detailing policies, objectives of  the Global Biodiversity Framework (Corporate Capture)

The GBF articulated by the Kunming Montreal COP15 is Agenda 2030 Target 19 focuses on the mobilization of US$200 billion annually by 2030 from public and private sources, is crucial for large businesses, corporations and governments. New Zealand Government joined nearly 200 parties in adopting the Kunming Montreal Biodiversity Framework on 19th December 2022 at COP 15 meeting all but two countries signed up to this. Conservation Minister Poto Willians refers this global deal of nature as protecting land and oceans, ecosystems where the government committed to $1.3 billion to International Climate Finance to support global ambition. NZ doubling its contribution to the Global Environment Facility to $23.5 million

Poto Williams states “The global biodiversity framework recognizes the essential contribution of Maori and other Indigenous peoples to UN Sustainable management, and now we must partner with others to play our part. To implement our commitments through Te Mana  o te Taiao” . NZ Government introduced a National Policy Statement for Indigenous Biodiversity (NPSIB). This includes a Biodiversity Credit System Iwi Elite and Government Partnership. The growing interest in investing in Nature partnering with Local and Central Govt.

Researched By Carol Sakey

https://www.doc.govt.nz/news/media-releases/2022-media-releases/new-zealand-welcomes-new-global-deal-for-nature/

https://environment.govt.nz/assets/publications/biodiversity/Biodiversity-credit-system-snapshot.pdf

https://dailytelegraph.co.nz/news/winston-accuses-mahuta-of-breaking-constitutional-convention-over-agenda-2030-agreement-signing/?fbclid=IwAR1gFTMw9xmhJFKhKStUk9W2GtwQQL2JmZSiGhkivnAG2kJjKJEEmDQEafY

 

 

 

...

ONE HEALTH SURVEILLANCE IN NEW ZEALAND SOONER THAN YOU THINK ‘CONTROL ALL LIVING BEINGS’

Otago University Prof David Murdoch spoke about the concept of the One Health Approach, saying this is going to be sooner than you think, this One Health  Approach to Disease surveillance. Describing this as an integrated, unifying approach for Humans, Animals-Wild and Domestic, Plants, Oceans, Estuaries, Rivers, Soil, Air the whole Eco-system.

An ecosystem is a geographic area where plants, animals, and other organisms, as well as weather and landscape, work together to form a bubble of life. This is how the academics, government explain eco-systems to a child “An ecosystem is made up of the interaction of all living organisms (like animals, plants, and bugs) in an area with all of the non-living organisms (like water, dirt, rocks, and the sun).

Academics, Governments, NGO and corporate ventures etc., are using a ‘One Health Approach to ward of any future threats (ANY)

So, academics are saying ““Increased urbanization, overcrowded living conditions, increased global migration, and the increasing push of humans into animal habitat has created an environment that promotes the transmission of infections and made the COVID-19 pandemic possible.”. BUT  this is what they are promoting the future slums of called Smart Cities. C40 Cities with mass migration entrenched into urbanization. (Reference Mayor Migration Declarations- Mayors Migration Council- Mayors Mitigation with C40 Cities).  Auckland has won a C40 Award for their acceleration and promotion of the 100 city C40 City Network under Phil Goff which was resigned before the new mayor took over. (Wayne Brown).

C40 Cities network Dietary Plan-Plant Based Foods targeting farmers within highly populated areas. No Farmers No Food.. ah well eat tree’s and beetle bugs this is barking up the wrong tree so to speak.

Professor David Murdoch says “COVID-19 has thrust into focus the impact of humanity’s changing relationship with the environment”. In other words the ‘One Health Approach’

NO SURPRISES HERE:- Prof David Murdoch Otago University Flagship Research Council of New Zealand  funded by ..Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance- Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation – Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment

The Lancet One Health Commission called for transdisciplinary collaboration promoting and generating solutions to complex health challenges. COVID19 Pandemic recognizes the fundamental connectedness of humans, animals and the whole eco system.   CRISIS  CRISIS   CRISIS   CONTROL EVERYTHING

Of course, if you do not oppose the concept of a One Health Approach this equates to ‘Silence is Consent’

LINK:  https://www.otago.ac.nz/hekitenga/2020/otago742802.html

 

...

UN Agenda 2030 ‘ A Global Contract For The Future Of The World’

Traitors of Sovereign Peoples: NZ Government (Corporation) deliberately neglected to seek acceptance from the peoples of New Zealand. The peoples of whom are the Sovereign of our Nation of New Zealand when they agreed, committed to UN/WEF global agenda’s of demands and compliances. For example – UN Agenda 21, UN Agenda 2030. The Paris Agreement, UN Global Compact of Migration etc., NZ Govt is a party to approx.., 1900 UN Global Agreements. Many are non-binding but does mean country leaders are not committed to them. Once entered into Domestic Law a Non-Binding UN Agreement becomes Binding and lawfully effective. These UN Agenda global agreements are known as ‘soft law’, do not require parliamentary consensus or permission from parliamentarians only by key persons such as Government leaders.

Soft Law: Reinforces existing international law globally. Soft Laws drive the development of international law, ;lays down the groundwork for codification  constitutes new customary law. Soft Law norms do not need parliamentary approval. Soft Law depends on the acceptance rather than judicial enforcement. Soft Law and Compliance go hand in hand as does obligations, monitoring mechanisms. Peer pressure groups, individual are important motivators, as are young people as they take part in Schools Climate Change Strike, where student s are taught how to make their climate doom and gloom propaganda boards. Bill and Melinda Gates organized a Global Shapers gathering, Ardern was the guest speaker, it was here she boasted to the audience that NZ was the first country in the world to enter UN Agenda 2030 into govt policy and urged other countries to do the same ‘to follow Ardern’s lead’.  Govts favour ‘soft law’ because it allows agreement on content beyond consensus. UN Agenda 2030 preamble states ‘Human Rights For All’, however this is a huge fallacy. The global implementation of UN Agenda 2030 includes a massive invasion of privacy, discrimination and corruption worldwide also severe violations of human rights and civil liberties. 193 UN Member States pledged to ensure their commitment to the implementation of Agenda 2030 17 global Development Goals which include 169 Targets

Global Corporate Capture: UN Agenda 2030 is a very wordy document focuses on implementing global partners   (UN Member States partnering large companies- corporations). People centred-PPPs =People, Planet for Profit.. Wealth for the already very rich few. Agenda 2030 includes 5 Ps..People, Planet, Prosperity, Peace and Partnership. Agenda 2030 repeatedly references the ‘Financing for Development Outcome Document’, a major part of Agenda 2030 Action Plan to achieve the SDGs (Targets). Replacing ‘greenwashing and blue-washing with rainbow washing

Impossible To Action: In reality UN Agenda 2030 168 targets within the 17 global development goals are impossible to action as this means re-engineering everyone’s mindset, behaviour and evil regimes will never stop purposely and most deliberately keeping their populations poor and hungry. Wars make huge wealth. Evil and Godlessness is rampant. Equality is a bloody great lie. Population resources have been regulated and many restricted for many decades. This will get much worse as UN Agenda 2030 is obsessively implemented. Restricting, regulating people equals a much lower standard of living.

UN Agenda’s Global Pathway: We are in the midst of being accelerated to meet the goal timeline of 2030. In 2018 UN recognized that they could not succeed in meeting their deadline of 2030 for Agenda 2030 so they signed a strategic official partnership agreement with the World Economic Forum representative of Corporate Capture (Multi-stakeholder Corporate Capitalism), hence the acceleration of implementation of UN Agenda 2030 world wide through ‘Public-Private Partnerships’. Corporates on the accelerator pedal driving UN Agenda 2030 vehicle, government and their cohorts the backseat passengers and the sovereign peoples of New Zealand, small businesses, farming communities (farmers) being the road kill. All Political Cronies On The Same Page: Why do we know this? They have not shared and asked the sovereign peoples of New Zealand for their permission to re-engineer our lives, our economies to politicize, sexualize our children.-.Why? Because they know we wil say NO NO NO NO and you bastards will GO . They have not listened to our sovereign peoples serious concerns. They deliberately ignore our Human Rights and Civil Liberties. It’s my personal opinion that we the Sovereign Peoples of New Zealand are being ruled by liars, crims, cheats and traitors.

Public-Private Partnerships: New Zealand Government with Iwi Elite is already happening. (Fresh Water Iwi Group Leaders- National Iwi Group Leaders). Partnership with Blackrock and Vanguard and other Global Corporations. Blackrock asset manager of NZ Superannuation Fund. Blackrock partnership with Kiwi Bank, both government owned. Blackrock invested Superfunds into weapons and chemicals when Ardern introduced the ‘Buy Back of Firearms’ the government then halted the Blackrock investment into weapons. Non-transparency of NZ Authoritarian regime means we can never trust them to implement ‘public good’ or the common law of the sovereign peoples of New Zealand ‘Firstly ‘Do No Harm’. They have done immense harm to the sovereign peoples of NZ. Have no conscience, show no shame consequently will do anything they choose to do. Hence Corporate Capture and the plundering of New Zealand.

Financial: Digital Corporate Capture. Blackrock already owns more wealth than the World Bank and the IMF. Central Bank Digital Currency. Digital Wallets. Cashless Society. Digital capture and control people. The richer become much richer and the poor become poorer. Again Corporate capture and controlling of peoples lives, re-engineering behaviour and society. See UN Agenda 2030 ‘Financing for Development Outcome’. Expanding taxation. A progressive tax system, broaden tax base, set domestic target & timelines as part of the SDG Agenda 2030 strategies support for developing countries. Increased empowerment of IMP and World Bank to access financial information. The sharing of information through financial institutions and third parties. Privacy no longer exists -your life in their hands. Blackrock partners Kiwi-bank and other major banks in New Zealand. Financing of UN Agenda 2030 Global  Development Goals (169 Global Development Targets.): Information sharing, significantly restrictive regulations and increased policies. Access more information from financial services. Financial services increase sharing peoples personal information with third parties. Government -Corporations have access to peoples personal information. Financial institutions share your personal information. Strengthen regulatory frameworks to be aligned with UN Agenda 2030 so these practices can implement, adopt  Agenda 2030 strategies. Note: Clean energy includes footing the bill for $100 billion to promote public service & private investment in energy infrastructure-technology & renewables.

Migration: Grow inclusive services for migrants in their host countries, countries of origin and transit destination countries as to the implementation of UN Agenda 2030. Ensure adequate affordable finance for migrants in their host and home country. (This appears to replicate UN Global Compact Of Migration signed by NZ in Dec 2018). Climate Refugees flood across the world, the gap caused by the depopulation of host countries will be filled by refugee’s, migrants hence sovereign states will cease to exist.

Corporate Capture: Economic degrowth. Destruction of small businesses and farming. International laws increase as National laws decrease. Sovereignty will cease to exist as Friedrich Engels predicted “the withering away of the state in the wake of socialism”. At a meeting of the ‘Global Futures Councils’ the gathering focused on the worlds political landscape in 2030, it was said

Degrowth: UN Agenda 2030 the degrowth of New Zealand’s small businesses and rural farming. The corporate capture of New Zealand. National laws and sovereignty will cease to exist. Friedreich Engels predicted the “withering away of the state” in the wake of socialism.  At an annual meeting of the ‘Global Future Councils’, it was said that the worlds political landscape in 2030 will look somewhat considerably different from the present one.

Housing: Mega Cities: Greater surveillance, increased influence and more power of the people. High density city-urban living increases as does people isolation and working from home hence many more suicides. People living in pack & stack apartments not domestic pet friendly, not child friendly.

Transport: Walk, cycling, E scooters, Electric cars, Uber, share rides and public transport hence becoming dependent on public services.

Employment: Ardern in her trip to Europe in 2018 referred to New Zealand and Germany having 45% unemployed within the next 20years. Four day working week. Working from home. Will significantly crush personal innovation, goals and initiatives, incentives. Uncertainty and instability.

Food & Water: Water continues to be sold on the world’s stock market. Water restrictions and regulations increased, monitored. Control of all water and food by corporate capture. C40 cities increase worldwide planned dietary intake. Central Bank Digital currency controlling what people purchase and the services they use eg.,  food, travel, what you do and whom you meet with             the food controlled worldwide by Nestles, Coca Cola, Blackrock, Vanguard, Bill Gates etc., this path has already started.

Law: Huge increase in crime. People become a law unto themselves. Domestic laws will be replaced by global laws as all peoples will become global citizens of the world (Global Citizenship) Again Corporate capture.  Increased political control via political policing. UN Agenda 2030 equates to the Decade Of Action which also is in collaboration with IA Immunization 2030 ‘To leave no-one behind, everyone, everywhere at every age’. Depopulate and Degrowth.

These UN Agenda 2030 Goals as listed:- Goal 1. End poverty in all its forms everywhere. – Goal 2. End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.    Goal 3. Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages.    Goal 4. Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all. Goal 5. Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls. Goal 6. Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.  Goal 7. Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all.  Goal 8. Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all.  Goal 9. Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation. Goal 10. Reduce inequality within and among countries. Goal 11. Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable.  Goal 12. Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns. Goal 13. Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts.  Goal 14. Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development.  Goal 15. Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss.  Goal 16. Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels.  Goal 17. Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development.

FEAR MONERING IS THEIR WEAPON OF DESTRUCTION-Psychological warfare. One Crisis after another is being played out on a global scale. Fear leads to compliance and slavery of populations. They are scaring your children with Climate Doom and Gloom, the making of fearful placards at schools as to climate doom and gloom. Schools strike for Climate Emergency. UK Health Mental Healthy Services reference ‘Eco Anxiety’ and children’s nightmares as to climate alarmism. CDC publication of a book with monsters hidden everywhere refencing the COVID19 Pandemic. The alerting signs, images are everywhere. Children who are 5 years old and first attending school will no nothing but crisis and fear, facial masks and isolation.   Elderly people in nursing homes waiting for loved ones to visit. Funerals cannot be attended by all family members, friends and loved ones. Bodies of loved ones cremated where this was not a loved ones wishes. Gates to crematoriums, graveyards were locked. Imprisoned within borders. Traditions and cultures deliberately ignored. Peaceful Assembly and publicly opposing the governments narrative equated to character assassination by the govts purchased propaganda machine, house arrests, court appearances, huge fines. (Heil Hitler in NZ -Goebbels censorship). Increased violent political policing.  My own personal thoughts are “ All these fearmongering crisis strategies to control people are being used to  implement, action UN Agenda 2030 Global Development Goals worldwide”. Is UN Agenda 2030 the driving force behind COVID19 Pandemic?

UN Agenda 2030 introduced globally: Actioned, implemented locally. Population control . Technocracy. Resource Management, Destruction of the Free-market economy to replace the Free-market economy with the ‘corporate capture’ of multi-stakeholder corporate capitalism. The rich become richer, the poor become poorer and the middle income drop down to the poor class. This is a Marxist Class system, a Two Tier Society. The Jabbed and Un-jabbed. The Slave drivers and the Slaves. The compliant and the non-compliant, however comply or not you are still being controlled. There is no getting out of jail free card. Police State. End of Sovereign Nations. Destruction of Human Rights and Civil Liberties. Social re-engineering of people minds, behaviours to be compliant to UN Agenda 2030 strategies. (UN/WEF and  UN Member Nation Authoritarian Regimes)

Transforming Our World: Implemented, actioned by a global ruling class namely the ‘Great Reset’ has been planned for decades, the foot is on the accelerator now. Technocratic dehumanization, transhumanism we must STOP this from happening. Every crisis is a key strategy. This is not a conspiracy theory, they are so confident its well published all over the world. Its in your face, they are not hiding it, its no secret. The Sovereign peoples of New Zealand must hold those responsible to account, every MP that resides behind the political doors of the toilet bowl in Wellington. They ALL have full knowledge as to the deliberate harm being caused and will continue to be caused to our Sovereign Nation New Zealand, yet they continue down this road without conscience or shame. This deceptive fearmongering of vulnerable people and children, of the aged and the disabled. The deliberate destruction of traditions and cultures to replace them with a UN/WEF New Normal. Red, Blue, Green-Maori Party, Green Party, Labour and National Parties I personally believe are traitors of the Sovereign People of Our Nation. (All New Zealanders). They have deliberately actioned a divide and conquer, institutionalized racism with a Marxism Class ideology strategy. A Gender Diversity of Rainbows and Unicorns. A deliberate targeting of Males. UN Association Porthole for Education used by teachers to teach your children. Eg: Depopulation. A Stock carrying a baby in a nappy in its beak flying around the globe, is about to land on earth, however flames appear from the earth so the stork flys away with the baby still in its beak. Message: The world’s too dangerous to give birth to more children-depopulate.

UN Agenda 2030 JABS:  14 of the 17 Global Development goals include Immunizations, vaccinations.

Depopulation: Rockefeller Population Council collaborated with International Planned Parenthood Federation (History of Eugenics and Socialism) is affiliated with NZ Family Planning Services. (Largest Abortion Org., worldwide was accused of selling foetuses) . Eugenics is an ideology the global ruling class adheres to, supports and promotes. Replacement population rate for New Zealand is 2.1 we currently sit at 1.6

New Zealand Tax-payers: Donate to UN Agencies and their strategies. Because UN/WEF strategic partnership they also  donate to WEF also. Auckland City Council Website publish the promotion of the WEF. Central and Local Government are executing the strategies of UN/WEF SDGS & Targets. Sustainability is a global advertising pun. Smart technology relates to the strategies used to accelerate UN Agenda 2030. Technocracy is the science of social engineering. The focus is on Resource Management and Population Control. The theory of Malthusian (Marxist).

Resource Management Act: Is high regulated and will become much more so. This is a technocratic governance system to control peoples diets, the way they live. Behaviour  re-engineering. Auckland C40 Global City includes global dietary plan- more plant based foods and much less meat. All Local Councils implementing the measuring of our carbon footprint to change our behaviour (travel, food, energy etc.,) Equates to the New Normal – The Great Reset- UN Agenda 2030 Global Development Goals to transform all life on this planet by means of Corporate Capture and slavery.

Socialism- Communism: Are bed partners. Mahuta and her mystical taniwha friendship with the CCP Red Dragon.

Self Empowerment: Solutions include self-empowerment, you cannot walk in another’s shoes. A valuable source of information, knowledge walking alongside like minded people. Spread the truth. Do your research. The truth is out there. Live your inner truth. Be aware but not fearful of digital censorship, fear is a number one killer. Note the medical tyranny and serious violations of Human Rights. Reject vaccine certification and vaccine passports.  Use cash where-ever possible. Reject digital wallet. Reject new smart meters. Be aware that Smart TVs have an invisible camera within them, if you do not turn it off it can be hacked through the use of Netflix. You have been listened to and viewed in your own private home. (Have already experienced this hacking). Do not take part in COVID19 tests or COVID19 jabs. Do not trust this government (regime). I urge you to gain  Moral Courage.

Electioneering: Vocally push for ‘Citizens Initiated Binding Referendums’ and a Constitution set in concrete for the Sovereign Peoples of New Zealand-ALL New Zealanders this election year. When you hear an MP call for a referendum remember there is no binding referendum for the people of NZ therefore the government (regime) will always have the last decision making rights. Break the cycle of Red, Blue, Green and Maori Party. Support and encourage minor freedom fighting parties who are speaking out publicly about the tyranny that exists in New Zealand (Parties that come together under one umbrella).

Yet another fear mongering strategy: The pandemic is not going away. New variants a new crisis and the shite goes on. The propaganda machine -many more people are dying of COVID19.

DEBUNKING THIS FEAR MONGERING PROPAGANDA- Here is the Truth:-The World Health Organization last year requested all UN Member Nations to classify COVID19 deaths in alignment with them. 10th March 2022 NZ Government enacted that ‘Any person who had a COVID19 positive test, if they died within a month of that test they are then counted as a COVID 19 death. This window of time can be extended. In the UK it has been extended in some cases to 60 days. Therefore other deaths such as suicide and post jab deaths etc.,  are hidden. Remember the man that was shot by police in New Lynn Auckland, the propaganda machine called this a COVID19 death.

Arderns Global Christchurch Call: Is this all part and parcel of the strategy to implement UN Agenda 2030.  (Gun Buy Back Scheme) and Hate Speech- Censorship

The UN Global Compact of Migration signed by Winston Peters December 2018: Is this all part of UN Agenda 2030 strategy to rid us of our sovereign nation in favour of globalization (global citizenship) ? WEF Klaus Schwab stated that ‘sovereign nations’ will no longer exist.

Ardern’s Climate Emergency- Climate Refugee’s in host countries.. is this also a crucial part of implementing UN Agenda 2030 ?.

Central Bank Digital Currency- Is this all part of implementing UN Agenda 2030.

The Replacement of the Resource Management Act into 3 New Legislations. Three Waters, He Pua Pua are these all part of the strategy to implement UN Agenda 2030 development Goals?

The mandating of COVID19 jabs. Arderns purchasing enough jabs for 2 shots in the arm for every New Zealander- man, woman and child. Is this a crucial part of the action plan to implement UN Agenda 2030 (SDGs 14 of the 17 relate to jabs) IA 2030 Global Strategy of Inoculation-Vaccination. 2020-2039 The Decade Of Action.

The Therapeutics Products Bill. Strictly regulate Natural health products. Significantly increase off label medicines drugs across New Zealand. Note off label drugs are unapproved drugs and medicines. COVID19 jab number four was not approved by Medsafe was an off label drug. Off label drugs can only be given to a limited number of people.    Pfizer-Moderna had stated that each country, state would have to seek their own approval system for authorizing the jabs.

Increased political policing and violence: At Parliamentary grounds was this part of UN Agenda 2030 strategy to control people’s voices and actions.. compliance and control ?

Targeting Farmers: No Farmers No Food. Those that control the food control the people, the same applies to fresh water. Is this also a critical part of UN Agenda 2030 strategy?

WAKE UP NEW ZEALAND NOW. Our Sovereign nation of people (New Zealanders) are under attack from the MPs that you voted in.

 

...

OPPOSITION TO THE CA + WHO INTERNATIONAL PANDEMIC TREATY (ACCORD) OBJECTIONS EMAILED TO THE NZ ‘HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES’ ON 8TH MAY 2023.

Please find below  my opposition to the LEGALLY BINDING  WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty.

I have found that the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) “Zero Draft” the new agreement on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response, called WHO CA+, is significantly flawed.  Due to the evidence and information provided below I oppose the WHO CA+ Treaty.

(1)WHO failed miserably in preventing the spread of COVID-19, the WHO CA+ draft would dramatically expand WHO authority to declare a pandemic and, thereby, trigger provisions in the treaty that would re-allocate resources and encourage governments to waive intellectual property rights

(2)New Zealand is already playing an active part in planning the WHO CA+ without consultation of the public of New Zealand’s input. The Government have been deliberately non-transparent as to the WHO CA+ and its purposes, aims, goals as to its intention as to the WHO Pandemic Treaty (Accord)

(3)The proposed Treaty is due to be introduced at the 77th World Health Assembly in May 2024.  If New Zealand agrees and are compliant to the WHO CA+ this will risk  further increased significant tax payer payments  as to the allocation  to the added expenditure it will cost our country

(4)The World Health Organization has already miserably failed since the pandemic first evolved on many accounts, yet it appears that members of the New Zealand Government are supporting and even promoting the WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty (Accord)

(5)The draft of the WHO CA+ clearly focuses on significantly strengthening, expanding the powers of the World Health Organization which I note signed a ‘Partnership Memorandum with the World Economic Forum on 13th June 2019.

(6)The WHO/ WEF is now  a Public-Private Partnership. The UN was never originally declared as such when it was created.  Obviously through the extraordinary super powers awarded to the WHO would also reward the Multi-stakeholder Corporations that WEF represents., therefore there is a massive conflict of interest that would effectively bring multistakeholder corporations, and those represented by the WEF huge wealth and power in the realms of  global politics and economies. The WEF is the whisperer in the ears of the WHO.

(7)The ZERO draft of the International Pandemic Treaty focuses on hugely expanding the authority, powers of World Health Organization, which give WHO the super powers to trample on ‘intellectual property rights’ and the redistribution of knowledge and technology. The WHO will become the only one, so called source of ‘Truth’, therefore having the ability to shut down the ‘True’ source of Truth., this is very dangerous.

 (8)WHO International Health Regulations 2005 failed miserably when it came to accessing China’s part in the origins of the COVID19 pandemic instead of holding them to account and responsible for their failings under the IHR2005 the WHO now parrots the CCP and even praises the Chinese regime. Therefore cannot be trusted to be such a superior force of authority over all UN Nation States.

 (9)In accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the principles of International Laws the people of New Zealand have the right to self-determine and manage their own autonomous approach to public health. This is a ‘sovereign’ right, the people of New Zealand are the ‘sovereignty who have that right. The global superior authoritative right does not lay with the WHO to control, cause damage to society, business, infrastructure or medical, technical determinations of the people of New Zealand. The people rights in New Zealand are that of ‘self determination’

(10)The people of New Zealand have in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the Principles of International Law the sovereign right to determine, manage their own approach to public health, this notably also means ‘pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems pursuant to the autonomy of domestic policies, legislations. That is provided that within this domestic jurisdiction the control awarded to the state through the vote of the people in New Zealand ‘causes no harm, damage to the peoples of New Zealand’.

(11)Sadly I say there has been much damage done to the peoples of New Zealand through the governments misinformation as to the COVID19 immunizations and the mandating of these. The closures of businesses throughout New Zealand and the loss of work and income.  Also the closure of schools where many children have not returned back to school.

(12)The members of  New Zealand House of Representatives have shown themselves to be  non-transparency upon publicly  exposing the serious harms and deaths of post COVID 19 immunizations. The many law abiding decent people of New Zealand have been deliberately abused by members of the New Zealand mainstream news media that has been paid for by the Governments Journalist Fund.

 (13) A member of Parliament namely Michael Wood character assassinating, labelling people those who are grieved through loss of work and income, loss of businesses as a so called ‘River of Filth’. Amongst those people he called a ‘River of Filth’ and ‘Anti -Vaxers’ were those that had been vaxed and were suffering serious harms post immunization.  As noted, not one member of Parliament has apologised for this cruel emotional harm caused to people of New Zealand by members of the House of Representatives. 

(14)The mandating of COVID19 Immunization. The following  term has often been quoted by members of WHO and WEF,  and even members of NZ House of Representatives ‘No-one is safe until everyone is Safe’. Pfizer Chief Executive has publicly admitted that they did not test their COVID19 immunization for transmission prior to entering the global market place.  Evidence has shown us that those that have been injected with the Pfizer mRNA  Injection have still been infected by the virus.. . Obviously the people of New Zealand have been misled when it has come to mandating of COVID19 immunizations and mandates

(15)It is a huge concern that large Pharmaceutical companies such as Pfizer have and continue to advise the Intergovernmental working group on the WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty as to the Zero Draft which is a huge conflict of interest.

(16)It is a deep concern that if the New Zealand Government continues to pursue, support the WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty (Accord) it would give the WHO superior authority over NZ Domestic policies. WHO would have the power to declare a pandemic globally whether New Zealand is affected or not and could have the power to reallocate resources.

(17)The Zero Draft of the WHO CA + Pandemic Treaty makes transparency and cooperation mandatory (legally Binding). Uses the word ‘shall’ when referencing facilitating accessing, sharing of research and genomic data, however there are no repercussions for ‘non-compliance’. It is evidently clear that the WHO and those drafting this treaty , and those that support, promote it have learned nothing. There is no reason to believe that China would be compliant with the obligations set out in the WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty (Accord)  I also note that the  World Health Organizations failure to quietly abandon investigations into China’s incompetence to comply to the legally binding WHO Health Regulations (IHR 2005)

(18)The WHO CA+ Draft lets China off the hook. Despite China having the largest economy in the world the United Nations considers China as a developing country. Developed countries financially support developing countries when it comes to ‘common but differentiated responsibilities’ among nations. Developed countries would share the greater costs therefore  China will likely be the beneficiary of the WHO CA+ obligation for developed nation parties, among other provisions.

(19)The WHO CA+ Pandemic Treaty Zero Draft calls on the parties to tackle misleading, misinformation or disinformation. Yet the WHO  themselves have been the source of disinformation when they tweeted  “preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of COVID 19.

I refer to the ‘World Health Organization ‘Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no evidence of human to human transmission of the novel coronavirus (2019-n CoV) identified in Wuhan Vina. Twitter January 14th 2020 18

https://twitter.com/WHO/status​/1217043229427761152 

(20)As for the CDC on the efficacy of facial mask wearing that shifted over time, when Anthony Fauci defended flip flop accusations after shifting mask guidance, this has reported changed time and time again. There is much controversy about mask wearing. It is clearly evident that many people wear masks as chin straps. Masks do risk emotional, psychological damage to some extent. Mask wearing is not normalised behaviour so will affect people in different ways.  LINK: Independent, July 29, 2021, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/fauci-cdc-mask-flip-flop-b1892600.html

(21)A recent study found that natural immunity acquired by a COVID-19 infection was “associated with lower incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, regardless of the variant, than mRNA primary-series vaccination. Yet WHO superior authorities under a legally binding Pandemic Treaty could mandate all populations to be vaccinated, immunized without accountability. This is very dangerous.

LINK:” Hiam Chemaitelly et al., “Protection from Previous Natural Infection Compared with mRNA Vaccination Against SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Severe COVID-19 in Qatar: A Retrospective Cohort Study,” The Lancet, November 11, 202, https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(​22)00287-7/fulltext (accessed February 24, 2023).

(22)The WHO and UN Member Nation Governments and their  so called experts have been proven wrong far too often, yet the WHO Pandemic Treaty gives WHO the global super power authority to police “disinformation. This seriously infringes on the internationally accepted right to freedom of expression. (UN International  Human Rights and NZ Domestic Human Rights Legislations)

(23)The WHO CA+ Treaty Draft emphasizes ‘Equity’. It is guided by ‘Equity’, which is defined by the absence of unfair, unavoidable or remediable differences among and within countries, including between different groups of people, whether these groups are defined socially, economically, demographically, geographically or references ‘Inequality’. The term ‘Equity’ and ‘Equitable’ appear more that thirty times in the ZERO Draft of the Treaty, however there is no clear definition what this means.

(24)The people of New Zealand have the right to have clear, concise information. (ibid., Art 3,4 (3) ). It is evidential by the ZERO Draft of the WHO CA+ Treaty that it is guided by ‘Equity’, a term that is deeply rooted in ‘Marxist’ ideology and should never be embedded in the guiding principles of any international legally binding commitment of any State, including that of New Zealand.

(25)The ZERO Draft of the CA+ International Pandemic Treaty (Accord- Convention) commits to the term ‘Universal Health Coverage’, this is not clearly defined. I stand to be corrected, but does that mean that the Government provides the peoples of New Zealand health care, is that with or without costs to the peoples of New Zealand, and at what costs must the people of New Zealand pay?. How will this indeed affect tax payers pockets?

(26)Its obvious that if the NZ House of Representatives agree, comply to the WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty domestic legislations will have to be amended.  The people of New Zealand are not awarded end decision making rights when it comes to domestic policy making.    I refer to the (Non-Legally Binding Citizens Initiated Referenda), and even if this did become ‘Legally Binding’ the people of New Zealand would have no end decision rights when it comes to Domestic Policies due to the legally binding nature of the WHO CA+ Treaty.. Therefore upon voting for political parties at election time, this means that promises made to the voting public can be over- ridden by the WHO Pandemic Treaty

(27)The WHO CA+ Pandemic Treaty (Accord) incorporates a ‘One Health’ approach framework. This includes ‘Humans, Animals-wild and domestic and all Eco-systems’. This means that the WHO under the WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty has massive super superior control over every aspect of life on this planet.

(28)WHO CA+ Treaty under the classification  of ‘Climate Change’ will have the authority to restrict, control food systems, trade and travel, infrastructure, land use and property rights. This is scandalous and extremely dangerous when it comes to the health and wellbeing of New Zealanders.

(29)Those that reside in the NZ House of Representatives are accountable to the people of New Zealand who voted them in to the political positions they hold in the New Zealand House of Representatives. To be responsible and accountable to ALL peoples of New Zealand.  Through researched evidence of viewing speeches in the House and other UN Information that New Zealand Members of Parliament are supporting, promoting and are in agreeance with the WHO ZERO Draft of the CA +.

(30) I also note that at the 77th gathering of the World Health Assembly the final draft of the CA+ WHO International Pandemic Treaty will be produced, introduced to all UN Member Nation States to determine whether, and which UN Member States agree on the WHO International Pandemic Treaty (Accord)

(31) I therefore request that the NZ House of Representatives transparently accords the peoples of New Zealand open public debate, discussion without political intrusion as to all knowledge, information that is pertained in every ZERO draft of the WHO CA+ Pandemic Treaty as it is produced, introduced.

The draft states that the WHO CA+ “shall be subject to ratification, acceptance, approval or accession by UN Member Nation States, therefore clearly requires advice and consent under the process outlined., “Circular 175 Procedure,” https://2009-2017.state.gov/s/l/treaty/c175/index.htm (accessed February 24, 2023).

(32)I conclude that the  WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty (Accord) is highly problematic and deeply flawed and would allow the global superior powers of the World Health Organization (UN) to have authority over New Zealand’s domestic policies. One size does not fit ALL and there is no evidence of ‘trustworthiness’ as to why the people of New Zealand should support this WHO Treaty proposal.

(33)The ‘Public-Private’ partnership of the World Economic Forum with the UN is a huge conflict of interest as they are  the ‘whisperers in the ear’ of the UN, therefore also  rewarded global superiority political, economical control through the  WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty (Accord) agreeance.

Therefore, for all the above reasons , information provided I totally oppose the WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty (Accord). I find it to be highly dangerous to the health and wellbeing of ALL peoples of New Zealand. I have cc’d other groups, individuals, organizations, members of parliament the above information-communication t as outlined to the NZ House of Representatives as to opposition of the WHO CA+ International Pandemic Treaty.

I request a response at your earliest. Thank you.

 

Carol Sakey

...