The Utopian Fiction of the Life Boat Paradigm that suggests that “Harmony & Interests – Lifestyles -are all the same”

Personally I believed the coined phrase Sustainable Development should be totally banned. Its corrupted, meaningless. Obscures real issues. It’s a catch phrase of Globalist Governance – A political-Economic- Societal Global Agenda

The coined phrase describes anything & everything. Is extremely vague & loaded with assumptions, hidden agenda’s – often promotes a Decolonization Theory  as a global strategy

Corporations, companies that leach poisons, toxins down drains into waterways etc., are often marketed as Sustainable. The worlds most used marketing, advertising word ‘Sustainability’ And the masses fall prey to it.

The Sustainability Development trap. The ideology of Nature back to Nurture. Promoting Sustainable Development at any cost. The biggest cost is to the consumer. Yet Sustainable Development is entwined into the Global Degrowth Strategy.

Sustainable Development – You’ll be Happy but you will own Nothing. The New Normal- The Decade of Action. A Socialist Global Governance worldwide. An extremist radical global Agenda. Transforming Our World 2030 (Without your consent) A Global Political Agenda

The concept of ‘Sustainable Development. The Village Civilization endorsement of the SDGs. The Brundtland Report– Sustainable Development for the ‘Present Generation and for Future Generations to Come.

Namely described as ‘Meeting the Needs of the Present’- without compromising the Ability of Future Generations to meet their own Needs. Is not necessarily sustainable for Future Generation..

This is exploitation of the Present Generations and Future Generations to come- The Zero Sum Game Changer in the name of the globalized Catch-Phrase ‘Sustainable Development’

In the name of Sustainable Development- Drones- Robots- Wind and Solar Farms on vast pieces of productionable land for Food Security. But justified under the concept of Sustainable Development

The destruction of the lives of Small Farming Industries-. Small Businesses all the name of Sustainable Development. Destruction of the Free-market innovative Economy all under the globalist Sustainable Development Strategy.

The expansion of Free Choice and many other virtues of the Free-market economy- individual choice. Adam Smiths Wealth Of Nations which spells out the benefits of the Invisible Hand for Citizens and Society- But populations worldwide are trapped in the Sustainable Development Globalist Agenda

Economic Freedom is at the heat of Free-markets, a precondition for Political Freedom  of Expression. Under Stakeholder Capitalism (Socialism) Production is under centralized control by the Govt where individuals lack the economic means to sustain themselves

Free-markets create a future promoting integrity and trust where the future matters. Multi-Stakeholder Capitalist is everywhere.. Klaus Schwab’s baby which was originally popularized post the 2008-2009 Global Recessions by Govts, Corporations-Corporations etc., worldwide.

Stakeholder Capitalism the new mantra of the Business Round Table announced in August 2019 endorsed by 200 CEO’s of the largest Corporations in the world, the worlds top business CEO’s in DAVOS Switzerland ‘Corporate Capture- Sustainable Development

Its not a new idea.. it was launched by the 1932 Management Classic ‘The Modern Corporation’ and ‘Private Property’ author Adolf A Berle & Gardiner C Means. Where Public Firms have Public Managers who would balance the claims of different stakeholders- taking into account public policy

Big companies tried to implement it over 40years, it led to mass confusion  was known as the  as  the ‘Garbage Can Organizations’. Trapped in Sustainable Development. Corporation the front seat drivers. Govts the Back Seat Passengers & Civilians  (Citizens) the Window Dressing.

The UN & UN Member States enables Corporate Capture. Creating a narrative where corporations are portrayed as benevolent heroes that are necessary for the world to achieve Sustainable Development

Unmasking Corporate Capitalism (Eco Socialism) Sustainable Development a monopoly of Corporate Control

The Green Ideology of many shades of Grey. Sustainable Development a concept that’s mainly philosophically packed with hidden agenda’s, assumptions, predictions, theories… of Wind and Solar Farms. It will be a Dark World when the Lights Go Out. All In The Name Of Sustainable Development.

WakeUpNZ

RESEARCHER: Cassie

The Global Vaccination Summit was held in Brussels on September 12, 2019. It was co-hosted by the European Commission and the World Health Organization (WHO). The summit aimed to accelerate global action against vaccine-preventable diseases and combat the spread of vaccine misinformation. It brought together around 400 participants, including political leaders, health professionals, and representatives from various organizations.

Here’s a more detailed breakdown:

Key Goals:- The summit focused on increasing vaccine confidence, boosting research and innovation in vaccines, and demonstrating the EU’s leadership in global vaccination efforts.

Participants:- The event included political leaders, scientists, medical professionals, representatives from the pharmaceutical industry, philanthropic organizations, and civil society.

Outcomes: – The summit led to the development of “Ten Actions Towards Vaccination for All” and highlighted the importance of global collaboration to address vaccine-preventable diseases.

Context:- The summit took place against a backdrop of rising measles cases and increased vaccine hesitancy. The WHO had recognized vaccine hesitancy as a global health threat earlier in the year.

Global influenza pandemic

The world will face another influenza pandemic – the only thing we don’t know is when it will hit and how severe it will be. Global defences are only as effective as the weakest link in any country’s health emergency preparedness and response system.

WHO is constantly monitoring the circulation of influenza viruses to detect potential pandemic strains: 153 institutions in 114 countries are involved in global surveillance and response.

Every year, WHO recommends which strains should be included in the flu vaccine to protect people from seasonal flu. In the event that a new flu strain develops pandemic potential, WHO has set up a unique partnership with all the major players to ensure effective and equitable access to diagnostics, vaccines and antivirals (treatments), especially in developing countries.

https://health.ec.europa.eu/document/download/3a92fc71-fd94-4c05-be6a-188f01f42352_en#:~:text=To%20address%20these%20challenges%2C%20the,and%20improving%20access%20to%20healthcare.

GLOBAL VACCINATION SUMMIT BRUSSELS 12^TH SEPT 2019  EUREOPEAN COMMISSION.  WHO

RESEARCHER: Cassie

WakeUpNZ

Replaces the 1996 Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act. There is a reason why Genetic Engineering has been restricted to Containment Labs- because the potential serious risks if out in the environment. The Govts Health Committee received many thousands of submissions that have voiced serious concerns over the risks if this legislation is passed. Of course the Govt will tell  NZrs the Bill of passed will enable the safe use of Gene Technologies (Gene Editing) . There are most certainly serious risks to those farming crops that are GMO Free and Organic farming of Crops with cross pollination from GMO crops to other crops that are not GMO grown

The Health Select  Committee Review and Consultation Process reported back to Parliament 10^th October 2025 recommending the Bill is passed with some amendments. However there is political uncertainty due to the lack of certainty within the current government. The Govts stated goal is to pass the Gene Tech Bill into legislation by the end of this year. If the Bill passes Royal Assent into Legislation NZs good reputation for GE Free and Organic farming could go down the toilet. This could also bring large Agri-tech and Bio-Tech companies to New Zealand, many of them have headquarters overseas, may well see NZ as a golden opportunity for expansion and more profit (An untapped test bed for Genetic Engineering). Eeem well I wonder what negative impact that would have on our Export Sector in NZ. (And the livelihoods of our Farmers and Growers)

Some people (Farmers in NZ) may remember the US Monsanto now Bayer and the genetically engineered Roundup Ready crops that were sold alongside glyphosate herbicide,  with more chemical use and no yield value.  NZ Farmers and Growers have been able to help each other out with seeds, however GE Seeds are patented this is how large seed companies make their big profits.. (Seeds and Fertilizers-herbicides) Only a few major corporations in the world have the world in their hands when it comes to selling seeds on the global markets.

There has been notable  serious opposition to GM Crops – food security- Safety when it comes to the health of Humans and Animals. NZs opposition to Genetic Engineering goes back to the 1970s when there was serious concerns about safety and contamination. In 1996 the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms (HSNO) Act was passed, creating the Environmental Risk Management Authority (ERMA) to strictly control all Genetic Modification activities

The NZ Royal Commission in year 2000 on Genetic Modification recommended that NZ should Proceed With Caution and Avoid Releasing GE Organisms into the Environment. Then came the very restrictive Containment Labs for GE Research in NZ. In 2014 The High Court ruled that Gene  Modification MUST stay Regulated. (As we must make sure it does stay Regulated. Then came the CornGate Scandal (GM Corn Seeds) that were suspected of contaminating crops in Gisborne and Pukekohe (Hence the Royal Commission on Genetic Modification)

But that wasn’t the end of it because there was also ‘Operation Pacific- Maize grown from imported seeds that tested positive for GE contamination. The containment was destroyed at the cost of $500,000. Just imagine how much more it could have potentially cost NZ when it comes to Health & Safety when it comes to our Food System – Health of Kiwi’s and our Domestic and Farm Animals. The Government cannot promise (guarantee Health & Safety of  the use of Genetic Modification (Genetic Engineering). Once the damage is done and GM cross pollination (contamination) happens the high risk is that it cannot be undone.

Reference to Prof David Williams, he was working on Gene Therapy at UCLA. He warned the farmers about the Gene Tech Bill saying it was based on false assumptions referring to precision and safety (Well documented ‘Off-Target Effects of CRISPR & other Gene Editing Tools) This included chromosomal deletions  & genomic instability). He also warned that loosening NZ laws could wipe out export premiums that farmers receive for GMO Free Livestock and Produce

Williams also warns that loosening New Zealand’s laws could wipe out the export premiums farmers receive for GMO-free livestock and produce. Once released GE Organisms into the environment they cannot be contained (Be recalled). There are no guarantees there will be no mutations in livestock.  We are totally reliant on the Soil for Everything, contaminating  the soil with these organisms is an extremely serious problem when it comes to Health-Safety- Food- Farmers Livelihoods and our Export Market. Let alone the feeding of our own population in NZ. Contaminations incidents have happened in other countries this has been common and very costly. GE Farming involves significant risks economically, environmentally and lets not forget Health Risks

Some of the risks are increased reliance on specific herbicides can lead to superweeds.. Insect resistant crops. Long term ecological impacts OF GE Organisms are not fully understood, therefore carries risks with unforeseeable consequences for the environment. There have been studies  that have raised concerns about the long term effects of consuming GE Foods this includes Liver and Kidney damage, immune system issues and increased risk of tumors

Consumer choice and transparency  and the deregulation of GE may well reduce transparency, making it difficult for consumers to identify, choose NON GE or Organic Products. There are concerns as to mutations in animals. Major concerns fall into the following categories- Environmental * ecological * Economic & Trade * Health-Safety-Social Risks. NZ has a good reputation for its Clean Green Image  this could be undermined by the widespread adoption of GE Farming, lead to lost Export Markets

How are Non GE and Organic Crop and  Non GE  Crop Farmers protected if there crops are contaminated by GE Organisms. There have been instances overseas where farmers with contaminated crops were sued by the patent holding corporation for intellectual property infringement. (Even though this was accidental). Oh yes, this is corporate control. GE Seeds often tie farmers into multinational corporations for seeds and chemical supplies causing a dependency on multinational corporations.

There have been safety studies  where there has been raised concerns about the potential long term effecrs of consuming GE Foods, including Liver & Kidney damade, immune system issues, increased risk of tumors  (Animal Study Research). Another serious concern is the removing of mandatory labeling for certain GE Foods, making it difficult for the consumer to identify GE Products. This limits choice by Non transparency

Will this also lead to the creation of GE Animals  this risks involving invasive procedure, a high rate of developmental; abnormalities, un anticipated welfare issues in cloned offspring. Of course there are ethical concerns when it comes to the manipulation of an organisms genetic makeup including those related to intellectual property (Patenting Life Forms) Playing with Nature… Eeem Those that Control the Food Control The People. (For me the everlasting NO Trust Bio Tech COVID- Experiments-)

NEW ZEALAND WIDE PROTEST TOMORROW.. SATURDAY 29^TH NOVEMBER 12- 2PM KEEP NZ GE FREE. …See the Poster on my facebook for locations across NZ.

WakeUpNZ. Researcher Cassie

THE RISKS POSED ARE AS FOLLOWS:-  

(1) Negative Health effects from new Allergens or Toxins  (1a) Environmental risks like the creation of “superweeds” and resistant pests,   (1b)Reduced biodiversity, and ethical concerns about interfering with nature. (1c) Concerns as to the potential risk as to antibiotic resistance from genetically modified organisms   (1d)(GMOs) and the long-term, unknown consequences of genetic modification on ecosystems and human health.

(2)Health & Safety Concerns:-

(2a)Allergic reactions: Genetic engineering could introduce new allergens into the food supply. 

(2b)Antibiotic resistance: Genes for antibiotic resistance from GM crops could potentially transfer to humans or animals, contributing to antibiotic resistance.

(2c)Unknown long-term effects: The long-term health impacts of consuming GM foods are not fully understood.

(2d)New toxins: Some genetically engineered crops could produce new toxins. 

(3)Environmental Risks: –

(3a)”Superweeds” and “Superbugs”: Herbicide-resistant crops can lead to the development of herbicide-resistant weeds, and crops engineered to produce insecticides can lead to the evolution of pesticide-resistant insects.

(3b)Gene transfer: Genes from GM crops can spread to wild or weedy relatives through cross-pollination, creating new and potentially invasive plants.

(3c)Harm to non-target organisms: Pollen from some GM crops can be toxic to beneficial insects like the monarch butterfly.

(3d)Biodiversity loss: The promotion of monoculture and the spread of GM crops can lead to a reduction in crop biodiversity and impact the resilience of ecosystems.

(3e)Increased chemical use: Despite promises to reduce pesticide use, some GM crop systems can increase the use of chemical herbicides, leading to soil and water degradation.

(4)Ethical and socioeconomic concerns:-

(4a)Interference with nature: Some people have ethical objections to altering the genetic makeup of organisms.

(4b)Dependence on large companies: Genetic engineering can increase the dependence of developing countries on large seed companies, potentially giving them control over food production.

(4c)Loss of genetic diversity: The push for genetically uniform crops can lead to a loss of valuable traditional varieties.

(4d)Unpredictable interactions: Genetically engineered plants could have unforeseen interactions with the environment, potentially becoming invasive and displacing native species.

WakeUpNZ… RESEARCHER: Cassie