AN INTERESTING ARTICLE AUTHOURED BY: Brian Aiken November 16, 2020

Last year, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern was a guest speaker at a private gathering in New York hosted by Bill & Melinda Gates.
She told the audience that New Zealand took the lead under her control and incorporated UN Agenda 2030 into our legal and regulatory framework.
“… My government is doing something that many other countries have never tried. We will incorporate the principles of the 2030 Agenda into domestic policymaking and promote system-level action. I want … I believe that the change in approach adopted in New Zealand is needed on a global scale … “
The event was arranged by the goalkeeper, an organization founded by the Gates Foundation in 2017 to accelerate progress towards the 17 Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations Agenda 2030.

Melinda Gates told the audience in an ardent introduction to Jacinda Ardern that the Prime Minister “announced an international human rights program that promises New Zealand to lead, among other things, gender equality and the empowerment of women and girls.” It was.
She described our Prime Minister as “a true international leader who understands that the future of the world depends on eliminating inequality.”
It’s a shame that Jacinda Ardern wasn’t very positive about New Zealanders when he decided to follow the path of this experimental Agenda 2030. Most kiwis will not be completely aware that we have not only adopted UN doctrine, but are also world leaders in gender equality and empowerment of women and girls.

The Government of Ardern does not hide the fact that it is working to implement the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, but it is open and transparent on the agenda that underpins those goals and the policy implications of “eliminating inequality.” There is no doubt that it is not.
Agenda 2030, not by name, was featured in the 2017 Confidence and Cooperation Agreement between Labour and Greens. Instead, both parties have committed to the 17 Sustainable Development Goals that underpin Agenda 2030.

“The Greens support a transformative government that implements the United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals. During this parliamentary term, the Greens set many priorities to promote the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals. The Labour Party-led government will share and support these priorities. “
And that’s the way the Labour-led government has followed the country in the last three years.
This made Jacinda Ardern a child of the poster for Agenda 2030, the United Nations blueprint for modern socialism, but New Zealanders found that we were used as guinea pigs in international socialist experiments. Almost unaware.

In a speech at the 2018 International Conference on Sustainable Development in New York, the Prime Minister expressed his intention to lead the world by fully incorporating the Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) into domestic affairs. It was. Other countries have done it before and have incorporated indicators like the SDGs into everything we do. “
She said the government no longer relies on traditional progress indicators such as “economic growth” and instead introduces new experimental indicators. “… establishing a whole new indicator of national achievement beyond growth … the standard of living framework we have created a tool called. It has the concept of sustainable intergenerational well-being. At the heart of various decision-making processes – policy advice, government spending, and long-term management of our assets.

“Our statistics department is working on an ambitious project called Indicators Aotearoa New Zealand, which aims to create a comprehensive set of indicators of New Zealanders’ current and future well-being. . Economical, cultural, social and environmental.
“These new tools will help us achieve and monitor the achievement of goals like the SDGs. The first test of this new approach will be early next year. At that time, we will use these new tools and new approaches. We provide the first budget. We call it the Happiness Budget and are not shy about investing in alternation of generations … “
Just before the 2019 “welfare” budget was announced, the Prime Minister explained to a New Zealand business audience what the new approach of the government would entail. “Economic growth is important and we continue to pursue, but that alone is the standard of living for New Zealanders … This year, the new well-being budget will allow us to lay a strong foundation for both our country and our people. I hope we can do it.

The mainstream media doesn’t seem to focus on Jacinda Ardern’s commitment to Agenda 2030, which is not surprising given the imbalance.
This week’s NZCPR guest commentator, Dr. Oliver Hartwich, Chief Executive Officer of the New Zealand Initiative, explains how difficult it is to speak openly to the government, especially in this country.

“Our small population fosters social adaptability that makes it difficult to speak our hearts. We cannot afford to burn the bridge because of the two gaps.
“Most of us no longer doubt whether it is based on reality, and anyone who does so is called non-patriotic and trivial, so risk falling apart. Please let me do it anyway. “
Dr. Hartwitch is particularly critical of housing-related policy failures. As he says, if there’s one thing New Zealand doesn’t lack, it’s space to build a house. Still, the high cost of the New Zealand section, combined with excessive bureaucratic planning and excessive building regulations, has led to the “most expensive” housing market in developed countries.
The lack of affordable housing has been such a scandal for many years, and successive governments have prioritized fixing it. However, it is of little use, so the ideological framework that caused the problem in the first place is well established.

The housing crisis originated in Agenda 21 of the United Nations, the predecessor of 2030, and has had a major impact on New Zealand’s private property rights for over 20 years. Designed to prevent “urban sprawl,” “smart growth” policies are being imposed by council planners above and below the country, creating a serious shortage of residential land. The impact is clear – higher section prices contributing to the current home affordability crisis.

Agenda 21 was founded by the United Nations in 1992, dating back to the first Earth Summit in Sweden in 1972. Based on the idea that humans are destroying the earth, we are trying to control our lives with sensible sounds. Reaching a “Sustainable Development” Policy Mechanism – Meet the needs of current generations without compromising the needs of future generations.
When the United Nations updated Agenda 21 to Agenda 2030 in 2015, they highlighted 17 Sustainable Development Goals to manage every aspect of our lives. From the end of poverty to the intensification of cities and the elimination of inequality, the United Nations has planned it all.

The following summary of Agenda 2030 goals from the United Nations website does not justify the complexity of the proposed restrictions. Learn more about.
– Goal 1. End all forms of poverty
– Goal 2. End hunger and promote sustainable agriculture
– Goal 3. Ensuring a healthy life and promoting well-being for all ages
– Goal 4. Ensuring comprehensive, equitable and quality education
– Goal 5. Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls
– Goal 6. Ensure sustainable management of water and sanitation
– Goal 7. Ensuring access to sustainable energy
– Goal 8. Promote sustainable economic growth and decent work for all
– Goal 9. Promote comprehensive and sustainable industrialization
– Goal 10. Reduce national and domestic inequality
– Goal 11. Make cities and human settlements sustainable
– Goal 12. Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns
– Goal 13. Take urgent action to combat climate change
– Goal 14. Sustainable use of the ocean
– Goal 15. Promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems and stop biodiversity loss
– Goal 16. Promote inclusive societies and institutions for sustainable development
– Goal 17. Strengthen global partnerships for sustainable development

The UN concept was big and bold. They wanted a change in which every sector of society needed to mobilize 10 years of action. “To secure greater leadership, more resources … the necessary transitions to governments, cities, local governments … and include youth, civil society, the media, the private sector, trade unions, academia and other stakeholders. People’s actions create an unstoppable movement that drives the necessary changes.

At the heart of Agenda 2030, it is the “climate emergency” that justifies the need for “urgent” action. It is used to justify more regulation and control, claiming that humanity is destroying the planet. As a result, wildfires, droughts, floods and storms are all advertised as “evidence” that the global warming Armageddon is imminent. And it can only be avoided if countries take action to achieve UN goals, such as the redistribution of wealth. Poor countries.
In fact, this is the new face of socialism. The first is Agenda 21. Currently it is Agenda 2030. Next is “Agenda 2050”. For a new era socialist like Jacinda Ardern, “equality” is by no means equal enough, so it never stops.

Old school socialism fought the working class against the ruling class, but under the fundamental premise that exploiting the poor makes the rich richer, socialism is now in the struggle for equality. I changed my appearance. The underlying premise today is that it is fair to take from those who have it and give it to those who do not.
It has evolved into an obsession with equality of wealth, rather than all the most important principles of equal opportunity.
It’s a matter of dividing the country now. But the difference between New Zealand and most other counties is that there is no public debate here. We are transforming into a socialist country, but there is no full disclosure by the politicians driving this fundamental change.

There was no effective media investigation into these developments, nor was there an effective scrutiny from opposition politicians.
As a result, as Dr. Hartwitch points out, it is becoming increasingly difficult to discuss these issues freely. Especially now, the media is very openly biased to the left. In fact, it is our society that the Fourth Estate, once a guardian of truth, is now part of the problem and that much of the media has crossed the line from critical analysis and fact reporting to politics. It’s a tragedy for me. Advocacy.

Given the current lack of a balanced view, access to information has never been easier, but access to the truth has certainly never been more difficult. It’s ironic.
Behind the smile lies the most radical socialist government in our history, with the Prime Minister intending to incorporate the purpose of the world’s most socialist organizations into our policy and legislative framework. There is no doubt that it is.

To fight back, you need to start calling out what socialism is, but to call it out, you first need to lift the veil to find out what’s going on.
Next, we need to decide whether we want to be a socialist society that gives from those who achieve it to those who don’t, or whether New Zealand aims to be an opportunity society where everyone has a chance to improve. Myself and my family.

In other words, should New Zealand follow the path to socialism under the United Nations Agenda 2030, or should we respect people’s individualism and freedom and ensure that they have the opportunity to move forward? ??

In the latter case, by the time of the next election, we have a lot to stand up and speak together!

New Zealand’s Road to UN Agenda 2030
Source link New Zealand’s Road to UN Agenda 2030
LINK: https://eminetra.co.nz/new-zealands-road-to-un-agenda-2030/80172/

The idea of a cashless society is not a new one, and in some form or another, has been tossed around for decades. With the onslaught of COVID-19, concerns have been raised on whether handling cash can spread the virus. This has once more ramped up the discussion of America becoming a cashless society.
Essentially a cashless society means exactly that. No cash. Nothing. Zilch

Its a fact that a cashless society is is not perfect. Catastrophes, computer glitches or even human error can leave you without the ability to purchase necessities. The Balance points out that these same events make it impossible for merchants to accept payments as well.
A cashless society would leave people more susceptible to economic failure on an individual basis: if a hacker, bureaucratic error, or natural disaster shuts a consumer out of their account, the lack of a cash option would leave them few alternatives

What would happen to these individuals in a cashless society had no ability to open a bank account or had their bank account cancelled, it would become very difficult, if not impossible, for these individuals to purchase necessities.

Basically we are moving into a cashless Orwellian society, where they check everything. Check where you live, whom you visit and communicate with and how your mind works that makes you behave the way you do. Just another massive stepping stone to control populations.

Living in a cashless society also increases the risks of loss of security, privacy as people become even more reliant on technology and the information age. The information age of data modelling that produces so called evidence based results, it’s bad enough now but its going to get so much worse.

Other risks are, its takes a chunk out of small business profits, that’s if you are lucky enough to own a small business after Ardern’s government have finished stripping us all of our rights. Of course when you pay for products with a bank card then in tis digital world the information gained is huge, where you shop, what eat etc.

This new wonderful world of enlightenment and utopia is suppose to be so trusting NOT. A utopian cashless society is merely a mirage, another delusionary socialist, Marxist communist ploy.
Approximately 500 years ago Thomas More’s Utopia has influenced everything from the thinking of Gandhi to the tech giants of Silicon Valley,. More is best known for his invention of a word – and for his development of an idea that would be exported around the world. This concept would shape books, philosophies and political movements as varied as Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe, Mahatma Gandhi’s doctrine of passive resistance and the founding of the state of Pennsylvania. The idea, of course, was ‘utopia’.
More coined the word to describe an island community with an ideal mode of government. First published in Latin in 1517, the book Utopia means “no place” in Greek; Some coined the word utopia to describe an island community with an ideal mode of government

More’s Utopia was not the first literary work to play around with policy ideas: dreaming of a better life is an innate part of being human. Is vision was attractive to early socialists who saw this imaginary society as a blueprint for a socialist nation. These became known as the ‘utopian socialists’. Those who favoured an egalitarian distribution of goods, alongside the total abolition of money in order to achieve perfect social and financial equality.

Animal Farm by George Orwell brilliantly exposed the flaws in the communist view of society. The novel offers a view of human behaviour at odds with the philosophies and principles of a ‘perfect society’ as described in Utopia.
Many advocates of the ‘cashless society’ suggest it could offer a better and more-efficient world, but do they also fail to see how the behaviour of humans means the utopia of a cashless society is merely a mirage?

Utopia goes even further back in history to 380BC, when Plato wrote his dialogue, he described it as a communistic egalitarian city-state ruled by philosopher-kings called guardians, made up of both men and women. Instead of procreating within a family unit, these leaders leave the city once a year for a wild sex orgy. The resulting children, happily ignorant of their real parentage and brought up by the state, become the new generation of guardians.

For some people a cashless society may sound like science fiction, however its very real. Citibank and other financial institutions are already discussing, planning this.
The Computer Weekly News on 17/11/2016 reported, Citibank will no longer handle cash at its six branches in … which has been identified as potentially being the first cashless society, Today Citibank call this ‘banking for sustainable development’ (UN Agenda 2030)

The Reserve Bank of New Zealand documented a government paper entitled “Future of Money-Te Moni Anamata. Have your say (a what do you think article).
Below is part of the article a link is provided:-
The Reserve Bank is inviting your feedback on a series of issues papers to test our thinking about how we should approach our new role as steward of the cash system and make sure that central bank money continues to do its job in light of significant changes affecting how New Zealanders pay, receive and save money.
Future of Money – Stewardship (Te Moni Anamata – Kaitiakitanga) seeks your feedback on how we should steward of money and cash following a recent law change. • Future of Money – Central Bank Digital Currency ( Te Moni Anamata – Aparangi ā Te Pūtea Matua) wants your views on how we propose to explore whether a CBDC is right for Aotearoa.
You can both read and give your feedback online for these issues papers by 10am, Monday, 6 December 2021. • Future of Money – Cash System (Te Moni Anamata – Punaha) to publish in November 2021 will explain issues facing the cash system and explore options to achieve greater efficiency and resilience. Feedback will close in February 2022
The link is below and well worth a read.

https://www.rbnz.govt.nz/-/media/ReserveBank/Files/Notes%20and%20coins/Future-of-Money/Future-of-Money-issues-overview.pdf?revision=c7b72a5f-4924-43ef-bd5f-f109db8bfbf2&la=en.

THE CLUB OF ROME DOCUMENTS:- ‘The Greenhouse Effect’… “In searching the new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would bit the bill…all these dangers are caused by human intervention….the real enemy, then, is humanity itself” ‘The Council of the Club of Rome 1991’

Most influential organizations begin with the meeting of a few like minds. In 1965, Aurelio Peccei, an Italian industrialist, made a speech that proved inspirational to Alexander King, the Scottish Head of Science at the OECD. The two found that they shared a profound concern for the long-term future of humanity and the planet, what they termed the modern ‘predicament of mankind’.

Three years later, King and Peccei convened a meeting of European scientists in Rome. Although this first attempt failed to achieve unity, a core group of like-minded thinkers emerged. Their goal: to advance three core ideas that still define the Club of Rome today: a global and a long-term perspective, and the concept of “problematic”, a cluster of intertwined global problems, be they economic, environmental, political or social.
At the group’s first major gathering in 1970, Jay Forrester, a systems professor at MIT, offered to use computer models he had developed to study the complex problems which concerned the group more rigorously.

An international team of researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology began a study of the implications of unbridled exponential growth. They examined the five basic factors that determine and, in their interactions, ultimately limit growth on this planet – population, agricultural production, non-renewable resource depletion, industrial output and pollution.

The Club of Rome was founded, formed at David Rockefeller’s estate in Bellagio, Italy. They described themselves as ‘a group of world citizens sharing a common concern for the future of Humanity.

The Club of Rome consists of current and former Heads of State, UN bureaucrats, high level politician and government officials, diplomats, scientists, economists, business leaders from around the world

It is the membership of the Club of Rome that has formed a think-tank that provides ‘suggestions to the United Nations that are planned to radicalise the world, transform people, planet for prosperity (profit). The transformation that is going on right before our eyes that relates to COP26, UN Agenda 21, UN Agenda 2030 and IA2030, these are no accidents, nor are they mindless, they have been carefully construed and orchestrated. The Club of Rome think tank have played a huge part in all of this.

The Club Of Rome founded two sibling organizations namely the ‘Club of Budapest’ and the ‘Club of Madrid’, focusing on social and cultural aspects of their agenda also concentrating on the political aspects

The three clubs share many common members and hold joint meetings and conferences, they are ‘all in the one same beast’. The Club of Rome established a network of 33 National Associations. Membership of the main club is limited to 100 individuals at one time.

Al Gore, Maurice Strong are just two of those individuals who are affiliated to the main Club Of Rome through National Associations USACOR, CACOR etc.,
But one must ask who and what is the Club of Rome, it is not some little group of nobody’s or greenie activists or unheard of politicians.
They are senior officials of the UN, current and ex world leaders, founders of environments organizations.

If you research Ann Bressington’s exposure of UN Agenda 21, Club of Rome.

‘The Inconvenient Truth’ Al Gore who led the US delegation to the Rio Earth Summit and Kyoto Climate Change conference chaired a meeting at the Club of Rome held in Washington DC in 1997

The following are just a few who are members of the Club of Rome:-
Javier Solana, the Secretary General of the ‘Council of the European Union, the representative of EU Foreign Policy and Maurice Strong the former head of the UN Environment Programme and chief advisor to the leader of the UN – Kofi Annan.
Kofi Annan was the Secretary General of the Rio Earth Summit and also the co-author (with Gorbachev) of the Earth Charter and the Kyoto Protocol, also the founder of the Earth Council.

Mikhail Gorbachev the former president of the Soviet Union was a member of the Club of Rome, founder of Green Cross International and the Gorbachev Foundation.

Diego Hidalgo an executive member of the Club of Rome with Gorbachev of the Club of Madrid was also the founder and President of the European Council on Foreign Relations in association with George Soros.

Founding member of the Club of Rome and also the president of the ‘Club of Budapest’ is Erwin Lazlo, he also is the chairman of the ‘World Wisdom Council’’.
Anne Ehrlich – Population Biologist is married to Paul Ehrlich, she and hher husband Paul authored many books on human overpopulation
Hassan bin Talal president of the Club of Rome and the president of ‘Arab Thought’ is a member of the UN’s Global Roll of Honour, also a former director of ‘Friends of the Earth’ and the ‘Sierra Club’

Sir Crispin Tickell founder of the World Future Council, named as the United Nations champion of the Earth Forum, a former British Permeant Representative to the UN and permanent Representative to the UN Security Council, also the Chairman of the ‘Gaia Society’.
Sir Crispin Tickell is also the Chairman of the Board of the Climate Institute and a leading British Climate Change Campaigner.

Kofi Annan – former Secretary General of the United Nations. Nobel Peace Prize Laureate.
Javier Perez de Cuellar is the former Secretary General of the United Nations.

Gro Harlem Brundtland is the former President of Norway and the UN Special Envoy for Climate Change

Robert Muller is the former Assistant Secretary General of the UN, founder and Chancellor of the UN University of Peace.

The Dalai Lama, the ‘Spiritual Leader’ of Tibet. Nobel Peace Prize Laureate.

Father Berry Thomas a Catholic Priest is one of the leading proponents of deep ecology, eco-spiritualaity and global consciousness.

David Rockefeller is a Club of Rome Executive Member and the former Chairman of Chase, founder of the Trilateral Commission also the executive member of the World Economic Forum.

David Rockefeller donated land on which the United Nations stands.

Stephen Schneider a professor of Biology and Global Change at Stanford was one of the earliest most vocal proponents of man-made global warming, he is also a leader of IPCC Reports.

Bill Clinton the former President of the United States also founder of the Clinton Global Imitative.

Jimmy Carter – former President of the United States, Nobel Peace Prize Laureate.

Of course Bill Gates is a member of the Club of Rome. He is the founder of Microsoft, makes his wealth in investing into research that brings him billions of dollars of profit though philanthropy.

Naming a new more members of the Club of Rome including Ted Turners, George Soros, Jimmy Carter, Tony Blair, Deepak Chopra, Desmond Tutu, Henry Kissinger.
Of course there are many more far too many to mention right now, also those associated with Temples of Enlightenment and New Age Spiritual Activists.

George Matthews – Chairman of the Gorbachev Foundation Harlan Cleveland – former Assistant US Secretary of State and NATO Ambassador Barbara Marx Hubbard – President Foundation for Conscious Evolution Betty Williams – Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Marianne Williamson – New Age ‘Spiritual Activist’ and key members of the United Nations and leading professors of Academia. Eco-political and Eco-environmental.

The committee of the Club of Rome include more than 300 members. On the 21st March 2018 the Club of Rome report clled for a new enlightenment stating that is human beings do not fundamentally alter their current lifestyles and the economy planetary boundaries will soon be transgressed.
The bones of UN Agenda 21 and UN Agenda 2030 were laid out in a series of Club of Rome reports. one of the first being Limits to Growth (1971) this was mainly about ‘overpopulation

“The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities.”

This text is taken from the Club of Rome’s 2002 report, Planetary Emergency Plan: Securing a New Deal for People, Nature and Climate.
In that the Great Panic of 2020 (pandemic) is currently dominating the new cycle, don’t think for a minute that radical climate change alarmism has gone away. To the contrary, it is just waiting for the massive funding that will be sprung during the Great Reset

SOURCE: https://www.technocracy.news/club-of-rome-planetary-emergency-plan-declared/

https://www.who.int/teams/immunization-vaccines-and-biologicals/strategies/global-vaccine-action-plan
Global Vaccine Action Plan
The Global Vaccine Action plan (GVAP) was developed to help realize the vision of the Decade of Vaccines, that all individuals and communities enjoy lives free from vaccine preventable diseases.

As the decade is drawing to a close, the SAGE Global Vaccine Action Plan (GVAP) 2011-2020 review and lessons learned report, provides an overall assessment of plan’s successes and challenges. It also proposes 15 recommendations for the development, content and implementation of the next decade’s global immunization strategy
The Global Vaccine Action Plan (GVAP) ― endorsed by the 194 Member States of the World Health Assembly in May 2012 ― is a framework to prevent millions of deaths by 2020 through more equitable access to existing vaccines for people in all communities.
GVAP was the product of the DoV Collaboration, an unprecedented effort that brought together development, health and immunization experts and stakeholders. The leadership of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, GAVI Alliance, UNICEF, United States National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases and WHO, along with all partners – governments and elected officials, health professionals, academia, manufacturers, global agencies, development partners, civil society, media and the private sector – are committed to achieving the ambitious goals of the GVAP. Many more are expected to add their support in the future as the plan is translated and implemented at the country and regional levels.
https://iris.wpro.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665.1/10921/9789290617099_eng.pdf;jsessionid=3588ABFA01DADF7788502691C106876B?sequence=1 WORLD HEALTH ORG., (UN) REGIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR IMPLENMENTATION OF THE GLOBAL VACCINE ACTION PLAN IN THE WESTERN PACIFIC (This includes Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific Islands) 92 page Report.
Global Vaccine Action Plan 2011–2020 (GVAP). Aims of the Regional Framework for Implementation of the Global Vaccine Action Plan in the Western Pacific Introduction of new vaccines, immunizations

BE FEARFUL ENOUGH TO DEMAND IMMUNIZATIONS, VACCINATIONS.
In May 2012, the 194 Member States of the World Health Assembly endorsed the Global Vaccine Action Plan 2011–2020 (GVAP), a global framework that builds on its predecessor, the Global Immunization Vision and Strategy 2006–2015 (GIVS). GVAP offers a broad range of strategies and activities and establishes new goals for achieving the Decade of Vaccines vision of a world in which all individuals and communities enjoy lives free from vaccine-preventable diseases.
A wide array of stakeholders was involved in the development of GVAP. The Regional Framework for Implementation of the Global Vaccine Action Plan in the Western Pacific has been prepared to translate strategies and activities recommended by GVAP into the context of the Western Pacific Region and to incorporate all global and regional immunization goals. By consolidating all of this information in one document, the framework aims to accelerate progress towards achievement of global and regional immunization goals and to help stakeholders better understand how to work together in implementing GVAP in the Region

Strategic Objective: All countries commit to immunization as a priority. Individuals, communities understand the value of immunization and vaccines, o much so they demand them as their right and responsibility.
Global Vaccine Action Plan 2011–2020 In May 2012, the Global Vaccine Action Plan 2011–2020 (GVAP) was endorsed by the 194 Member States of the World Health Assembly. GVAP builds on the Global Immunization Vision and Strategy 2006–2015 (GIVS), endorsed by the World Health Assembly in 2005, and outlines a vision in which the full benefits of immunization are extended to all people, regardless of where they are born, who they are or where they live. Developing GVAP brought together multiple stakeholders involved in immunization, including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Gavi, the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), the United States National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and WHO, along with all partners – governments and elected officials, health professionals, academia, vaccine manufacturers, global agencies, development partners, civil society, media and the private sector

https://iris.wpro.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665.1/10921/9789290617099_eng.pdf;jsessionid=3588ABFA01DADF7788502691C106876B?sequence=1