Ardern’s VPN to the United Nations 2019 focuses on accelerated actions to UN Agenda 2030 and its 17 global goals. 17 of which refer to climate alarmism. 14 of the 17 global goals relate to the global strategy of vaccines (UN Agenda 2030- Global Strategy of Vaccines 2011-2020) for everyone, everywhere at every age…leave no-one behind. The UN Global Strategy for Vaccines 2020-2030 Leave No-one behind. The decade of Vaccines. New vaccines, immunizations and existing ones. A lifelong strategy, from the cradle to the grave.

These human experiments are all about control, severely restricting peoples lives and the destruction of human rights and civil liberties. The worst is yet to come. Number four booster of this human experiment has already been introduced. The preplanning of global pandemics is already being practiced, what you see now gets worse, much worse.

UN Agenda 2030 is the global framework to control people, how the live, what they think, how they behave. Jacinda Ardern in her VPN in 2019 openly talks about NZ Governments accelerated actions to UN Agenda 2030 and has even included it in the governments regulations, policies, laws. She boasts that New Zealand leads the way, other UN Nations should follow her lead.

UN Agenda 2030 SDG 1 refers to Poverty. The end of poverty in all forms. Zero Poverty, yet tere is a massive increase in poverty worldwide. Poverty in New Zealand. There is no single measure of poverty in New Zealand. … In the year ended June 2020, about 1 in 7 New Zealand children (157,800) lived in households with less than 50 percent of the median equivalised disposable household income before deducting housing costs.
It was reported on 26/09/2021 an additional 18,000 New Zealand children were pushed into poverty in the first year of the COVID19 pandemic.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/27/new-zealand-pandemic-policies-pushed-18000-children-into-poverty-study-shows

The people left behind in Ardern’s ‘kind’ New Zealand – BBC
https://www.bbc.com › news › world-asia-54444643….13/10/2020 — NZ election: The people left behind in Ardern’s ‘kind’ New Zealand … But critics say her government has failed to tackle child poverty .

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/338701/labour-would-lift-100-000-children-out-of-poverty-by-2020-ardern report dated 05/09/2017 Labour would lift 100,000 children out of child poverty by 2020 if labour was elected.. She said “her goal is to eradicate child poverty in New Zealand
The number of children living in poverty is expected to increase because of Covid-19.restrictions. I personally believe the government will introduce a new set of data modelling indicators as an evidence base. Data In and Data Out. Bull crap and custard… All part of UN Agenda 2030. Control, control, control.

I URGGE YOU TO SUPPORT THHE FARMERS GROUNDSWELL PROTEST NATIONAWIDE AND THHE NEW ZEALAND TEACHHERS PROTESTS. Thank you.

FOLLOW THHE ARROW TO MY RUMBLE VIDEO FOR MORE INFORMATION. Thank you Carol Sakey

Behavioural Science Aotearoa (BSA)  is actually a ‘Nudge Unit’.  ‘Nudge Units’ are used worldwide to subtly and sometimes in your face of  enabling desired outcomes for political policy making, regulations, laws.  Understanding peoples behaviour through using AI digital Re-Imaginings .
The NZ Government calls this giving small tweaks to seek the desired income from the citizens of New Zealand. Measuring effects of messages on behaviour outcomes

Like some authoritarian Iwi that collaborate with Ardern they  ‘Nudge’  Maori into not taking part in protests by referring to ‘Get your Mana back’.  In other words they are indiscreetly,  in a subtle way saying you have lost your Mana by opposing the governments restrictions, taking part in protests  “you lose your mana”  Which equates to ‘Nudge’, nudge don’t take part in protests and you will get your Mana back”   This is just one example being used. (Nudge Theory)

Another, in the Grey Power Newspaper “Grandparents be good role models for your grandchildren, get the shot in the arm show”  More ‘Nudging’ so that more New Zealanders are guineapig participants”

The United Nation Environmental Programme authored a book entitled ‘The little Book of Green Nudges’, a quick guide to reducing environmental impacts on campuses worldwide..  An Environmental Nudge refers to promoting desired behaviours through subtle changes in choice environment. These are passive and active.  This is all about behavioural modification, re-engineering of behaviour through a cognitive process, how to change human actions.

‘Nudging’ farmers to comply with water restrictions. Nudging techniques to promote Zero Carbons by 2030. As governments worldwide take part in ‘Behavioural Conferences.  Making a difference ‘Nudging for Policy Change’, introducing Digital Toolkits and Frameworks.  Mainstreaming behavioural Insights across Governments worldwide.

Behavioural Science used in Public Policy making, promoting the re-engineering of individual, groups behaviour. Gearing up the ‘Nudge Units’ to introduce stricter regulations to achieve their Zero Carbons . Behaviour change is a core component to achieving more inclusive and sustainable outcomes

The Behavioural Insights Team (BIT), also known unofficially as the “Nudge Unit“, … BIT has an office in Sydney, Australia, and in Wellington, New Zealand.

David Halpern is Chief Executive of the Behavioural Insights Team. … In 2015, David wrote a book about the team: “Inside the Nudge Unit:.  2021 ‘ The Behavioural Insights Team, The Nudge Unit. … this work have just been published in the New Zealand Medical Journal. Science is shaping how you behave

The ‘Nudge Thoery’ is a concept in behavioural economics, political theory, and behavioral sciences that promotes, acts upon  indirect suggestions as ways to influence the behaviour and decision-making of groups or individuals.

Ardern has over-extended her controls using the ‘Nudge Theory’.

‘Nudging’ can even over-ride peoples values, and be very unethical, violates civil liberties, human rights.

Nudge theory describes how indirect suggestions and positive reinforcement can influence decision-making. We used nudge theory to implement a traffic–light system.

2018 NHS England rolled out ‘Nudge Theory’, a digital traffic light system to decrease hospital visits during the winter months.

Businesses in New Zealand have been ‘Nudged’ by Ardern to continue the use of the Traffic Light System by still mandating staff and customers even though government mandates are suspended, until needed for the next variant that lands on New Zealand’s shores.

The Global Shapers, puppets of Klaus Schwab are in most countries of the world, there are  thousands of them. The Global Shapers are ‘Nudging’ the world to eat less meat’, by encouraging restuarants to change their menu’s, to push plan based meat-fake meat onto their customers.

The ‘Fast Food Company’ state they may well be ‘Nudged’ towards more plant based options- fake meat. The simple theory of behavioural economics could convince humans to eat less meat .

Ardern is ‘Nudging the citizens of New Zealand aiming for Zero Carbons 2030.

When being ‘Nudged’ give a shove and push back ‘get rid of the traffic light system’  Learn to recognize the ‘Nudges’. The solution involves.. When you realize you are being ‘Nudged” … Shove and  Push back.

PLEASE GO TO THE IMAGE ABOVE, CLICK ON THE ARROW WITHIN THE IMAGE WHICH WILL LINK YOU TO MY VIDEO  WITH FURTHER INFORMATION ON THE SUBJECT.

NOTE: PLEASE SIGN UP ON WAKEUP NZ WEBSITE IF YOU HAVE NOT DONE SO ALREADY.  Thank you – Carol Sakey

Putting the ‘Con’ in ‘Consensus’ There is no 97% consensus among climate scientists, many misunderstand core issues (Appeared in the Financial Post May 2015). It was the lead up to the Paris Climate Summit, there was massive activist pressure in and on all governments to fall in lines with the ‘global warming’ agenda, to accept emission targets which was reported as “could harm our economy”. Governments worldwide, including NZ’s threw out domestic economy under electric vehicles, wind and solar farms, the economy was to be like a train wreckage

It was reported that 97% of scientists agreed with the climate change debate, as it turns out that was a massive lie, it was made up. Climate Activist Bill McKibben claimed there was a consensus that greenhouse gases are a ‘grave danger’. He was challenged, asked where his source of information came from, he promptly withdraw it. Barack Obama US President at the time sent out a tweet claiming ‘97% climate experts believe global warming is ‘real’ man -made and dangerous”, he was referring to a survey that did not even ask that question, he made it up

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) asserts the conclusion that most (more than 50%) of the post 1950 global warming is due to human activity, chiefly greenhouse gas emissions and land use change. (But does not survey its own contributors, let alone anyone else, its unknown as to how many experts agree with this). And the statement, even if were true, does not imply that we face a crisis requiring massive restructuring of the worldwide economy. In fact, it is consistent with the view that the benefits of fossil fuel use greatly outweigh the climate-related costs. One commonly cited survey asked if carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas and human activities contribute to climate change. But these are trivial statements that even many IPCC skeptics agree with. Both statements are inconsistent with the view that climate change is harmless. So there are no policy implications of such surveys, regardless of the level of government.

The most highly cited papers supposedly found 97% of published scientific studies support man-made global warming. But in addition to poor survey methodology, that tabulation is often misrepresented. Most papers show that 66% actually took no position. Of the remaining 34%, at least 33% supported at least a weak human contribution to global warming. OK, so divide 33 by 34 and there you have it 97%, however 33% includes many papers that critique key elements of the IPCC position. There are more recent surveys that shed light on what atmospheric scientists actually think. Bear in mind that on a topic as complex as climate change, a survey is hardly a reliable guide to scientific truth, but if you want to know how many people agree with your view, a survey is the only way to find out.

In 2012 the American Meteorological Society (AMS) surveyed its 7,000 members, receiving 1,862 responses. Of those, only 52% said they think global warming over the 20th century has happened and is mostly man-made (the IPCC position). The remaining 48% either think it happened but natural causes explain at least half of it, or it didn’t happen, or they don’t know. Furthermore, 53% agree that there is conflict among AMS members on the question.

They are liars, there was no 97% consensus on man-made global warming. Half reject the IPCC conclusion, more than half acknowledge that their profession are split on the issue. The Netherlands Environmental Agency published a survey of International Climate Experts. 6550 questionnaires were sent out, 1868 responses were received. The questions referred only to the post 1950 period. 66% agreed with IPCC that global warming had happened and humans are mostly responsible. The rest either  did not know or think human influence was not dominant. Again NO 97% Con(Sensus) behind the IPCC

The Netherlands Environmental Agency recently published a survey of international climate experts. 6550 questionnaires were sent out, and 1868 responses were received, a similar sample and response rate to the AMS survey. In this case the questions referred only to the post-1950 period. 66% agreed with the IPCC that global warming has happened and humans are mostly responsible. The rest either don’t know or think human influence was not dominant. So again, no 97% consensus behind the IPCC. The Dutch survey that described ‘climate experts’ a large fraction only work in connected fields such as policy analysis, health and engineering, and may not follow the primary physical science literature. But the Dutch survey is even more interesting because of the questions it raises about the level of knowledge of the respondents. Although all were described as “climate experts,” a large fraction only work in connected fields such as policy analysis, health and engineering, and may not follow the primary physical science literature. Of 46 per cent of the Dutch survey respondents – nearly half – believe the warming trend has stayed the same or increased. And only 25 per cent agreed that global warming has been less than projected over the past 15 to 20 years, even though the IPCC reported that 111 out of 114 model projections overestimated warming since 1998. ¾ of the respondents disagreed, or strongly disagreed with the statement “Climate is chaotic and and stated it cannot be predicted.”

The  IPCC said in its 2003 report: “In climate research and modelling, we should recognize that we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore “the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible.” There are unresolved discrepancies between models, observations regarding issues like warming in the tropical troposphere and overall climate sensitivity, and Natural Climate variability. Its much too difficult to realistically climate model, simulate clouds. Clouds are an enormous influence in Climate Assessments, conclusions.

Lots of people get called ‘Climate Experts’ and they appear to contribute to the appearance of ‘consensus’, without necessarily even be knowledgeable about the core issues. A massive consensus by the misinformed really is NOT a Consensus.. It’s a big Fat Lie. Its worth nothing of any value. The phony claim of 97% consensus is mere political rhetoric aimed at stifling debate and intimidating people into silence. The Barack Obama’s website (barackobama.com) says “97% of climate scientists agree that climate change is real and man-made … People I urge you to call out all these political corrupt propagandists that reside in the toilet bowl of Wellington.

They laugh at you if you dare to publicly debate, discuss this Global Warming Agenda. They derail, shut people down. They even shut the real scientists down. This is not real science, this is about controlling populations worldwide into smart cities, to eat bugs and plant foods. To destroy farming communities, small businesses.This is Corporate Capture world wide, the profiteers are those that are the DAVOS Crowd. The WEF and the UN. The WEF representing the Multistakeholder Corporations. The UN with their International Rules. Like hand in glove WEF and UN official partnership agreement 13^th June 2019.. The United Nations implements their one world global governance rules and regulations worldwide to be adopted by UN State’s (Includes New Zealand) and the Corporations are deployed worldwide to accelerate the Global One World Governance Agenda to enslave populations worldwide.  UN Agenda 2030. Leave no-one behind, everyone, everywhere, at every age.

Those political cronies that reside in the toilet bowl of Wellington with their political policing are determining that the people have no voice to call them out on their corruption and lies. I urge you do not remain silent stand up, the more you speak up publically the easier it gets. It may seem uncomfortable, you may feel nervous at first but the more you do this, the more courage you get, the more empowered you are. Remember Silence is the CON in CONSENT.

God Save New Zealand.

Link:  https://www.fraserinstitute.org/article/putting-the-con-in-consensus-not-only-is-there-no-97-per-cent-consensus-among-climate-scientists-many-misunderstand-core-issues

THE ROYAL COMMISSION OF INQUIRY INTO THE TERRORIST ATTACK IN CHRISTCHURCH 15^th March 2019 includes:- 3.1 The Leadership and Oversight included in the Royal Commission of Inquiry. 3.2 Political Ownership and Public Engagement and 3.3 Leadership & Coordination

It was noted that in 2016 the Attorney General Christopher Finlayson undertook public engagement on the Intelligence and Security Bull that this included community hall meetings and visits to  mosques. In 2016, the then Attorney-General, Hon Christopher Finlayson, undertook public engagement on the Intelligence and Security Bill (see Part 8, chapter 14). This included community hall meetings and visits to mosques.

Before 15^th March 2019 terrorist attack the threat and risk of domestic terrorism (especially non-Islamic terrorism) was lightly covered in assessments and policy advice to ministers. For example when the National Security & Intelligence priorities were approved and the National Assessments Bureau to the prime minister included little on domestic extremism in our environment.

From 2010 to March 15^th 2019 these briefs contained fewer than 20 references to domestic extremism in NZ. (There was no detail given of those 20 or less domestic extremists in NZ). There was generally an absence, a concern about domestic terrorism on NZ Soil. Briefs by NZ SIS contained less than twenty official references to domestic extremism before March 15^th 2019.(NOTE: No detail was given about these)

Overall threat was assessed as low but not expected, very unlikely between 2010-2018. There was very little engagement between those responsible for counter terrorism effort and the public before march 15^th 2019. NZ SIS reporting was focused largely on suspected Islamic Extremists, the reporting of extremists by the police was similar of this too. Reporting of possible Islamic extremists. It was only after the terrorist attack in Christchurch 15^th March 2019 there was immediate increased engagement from the public of NZ. Public reports made to NZ Police and NZ SIS.

After 15 March 2019. In September 2020, the National Security and Intelligence Priorities were published directly on the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet’s website. And a high level countering terrorism and violent extremism national strategy was published on the Dept of the Prime Minister and Cabinet Website in February 2020. (There was no opportunity for NZ  wide public discussion or debate )

NOTE: Andrew Little and his plan for Hate Speech Laws followed. Gun Buy Back followed. (This initially established a global take back of small firearms). Firearms were taken or handed over to police in the governments  gun buyback scheme

Firearms belonging to gun club members and farmers. The gangs get to keep theirs, they do not register their weapons. Freedom of speech is attacked. Publicly speaking -opposing govts narratives  means walking on broken glass. Hence a significant increase in surveillance camera’s, warrantless searches, invasions of privacy. At one stage armed police shutting off a road in a residential area of Christchurch. Invading a persons home environment questioning the home owner “Do you support Trump?’  Another political police invasion in Auckland “Do you know any Conservative Candidates”

3.3 Leadership and coordination, the Royal Commission Inquiry notes that as for leadership & coordination roles within NZ’s national security system and the counter terrorism effort:-‘There is some lack of clarity about leadership, no-one agency is currently responsible for monitoring overall system performance.. A decentralised coordinated model is used and coordinated, no single agency has overall responsibility this is spread through multiple agencies.

The govt identified some weaknesses with this decentralised model of so called accountability and governance work in the NZ Public sector. August 2020 the Public Service Act 2020 was enacted to address these deficiencies.

Introducing mechanism  to facilitate collective responsibility & accountability for multi-agency programmes of work. Recommendations were made.

The all important question being: Was Right Wing extremism, white supremacy included in the National Security and Intelligence priorities as an area of focus for counter-terrorism?  The answer:- (Royal Commission Inquiry states) Not Specifically. The National Security & Intelligence priorities approved by Cabinet in December 2018 included international terrorism threats as domestic terrorism in other countries, but did not refer to particular ideologies.

The cabinet described these domestic terrorism threats as  “those that may arise in and against New Zealand or be carried out by New Zealanders overseas “ And the scope includes emerging trends and characteristics associated with overseas networks -links to NZ. The International terrorism threats were described as:-“threats against New Zealand’s interests overseas in areas which have the greatest exposure for New Zealanders, and the trends and characteristics of emerging regional and global terrorism threats” that may impact on New Zealand.

An unclassified version of the National Security & Intelligence priorities was initially published in the Dept of the Prime Minister & Cabinet 2019 Annual Report. In September 2020 the Dept of the Prime Minister & Cabinet updated its website to include the unclassified version of the National  Security and Intelligence Priorities, which included:  Terrorism. Threats to New Zealand, New Zealanders and NZ interests from terrorism (ideologically, politically or religiously motivated violence) at home and abroad.

Did the National Assessments Bureau or the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service raise the issue of white supremacy and right-wing extremism in the drafting of previous or the current National Security and Intelligence Priorities? National Assessments Bureau Right Wing Extremism, White Supremacy- such groups may come to prominence in NZ in response to the effects of the global economic crisis. Such groups would protest against perceived increasing inequalities, and this could lead to the adoption of more violent methods to effect political change

The Royal Commission Inquiry reports:-The Strategic Assessment 2015 did not mention White Supremacy neither did it mention Right Wing Extremism. The Strategic Assessment 2016 stated:-The recovery from the Global Financial crisis has left govts under pressure from disgruntled citizens, who are looking for alternatives on the political right and left, with un predictable consequences.

Question of the Royal Commission of Inquiry: Did the Government Communications Security Bureau or the NZ SIS withhold any information from the Dept of the Prime Minister & Cabinet relating to global trends in White Supremacy & Right Wing Extremism during each of its National Intelligence Strategy prioritising cycles since they were introduced.  The answer given was “We have no indication, there is no evidence, that this occurred”

Therefore I conclude from the Royal Commission Inquiry of the 15^th March 2019 Christchurch Terrorism Attacks” that SIS and NZ Police were made fully aware, were enacting upon- And there was zilch so called right wing extremism or so called white supremacy. What has evolved is tyranny, a government that intends to control all New Zealanders lives with their ideology of Marxism and Socialism which includes the characteristics of Communism

Evidence, were using monitoring and surveillance methods on potential Islamic in NZ: Reports were made through news articles in  Stuff News Media, RNZ and the Beehive Official website prior to March 15^th 2019. John Key’s Parliamentary speeches focused was on increased attention by NZrs who had intentions of going to fight alongside ISIS. Jihadist brides and Islamic Material -content online and money being sent to support the Islamic State.  There was a video link on one Stuff News article to Rebecca Kitteridge Director of NZ Security Intelligence Services showing concerns as to Islamic rise in the attention given by a small group of New Zealanders that supported ISIS-the Islamic State.

She also spoke in Parliament about this. RNZ reports 19^th April 2015 ‘Insight for 19^th April 2015-How real terrorism threats in NZ? Political Editor Brent Edwards. Rebecca Kitteridge is a worried woman. Since she took on the job as the Director of NZ SIS 11 months previous she said the threat of terrorist attack on NZ has risen. She reported that SIS had 30-40 people on their watchlist, were monitoring them. She said “the people under watch has increased to the high end of that range, not the low end. Some are considering terrorist action in this country.

The new article by RNZ reported that ‘Rebecca Kitteridge does not want to exaggerate the threat. She can still go to the supermarket without worrying about the prospect of being caught up in a terrorist attack”  Well that changed with the New Lynn, Auckland Supermarket Attack my an Islamic  Terrorist Act of radical extremism under the governments watch.

Fast forward that has already happened in a New Lynn Supermarket under the watch of Arderns Govts Police and Security Services. She said 6.“What mainly worries her is the influence of the Islamic State, as it reaches out to disaffected people in the West to not just travel to Syria & Iraq to fight, but also to carry out attacks in their own countries.

Kitteridge Director of NZ SIS  referenced an Islamic State professionally designed, produced magazine ‘Dabiq’ used to get the message across. She spoke of a small number of NZrs whose exhibiting behaviours mean they may be a terrorist risk to NZ.

Ms Kitteridge says she has no interest in exaggerating the threat. She says her job is to worry about the unthinkable so ordinary New Zealanders do not have to worry when they visit the shopping mall.

RNZ Reported 8^th December 2015.  A number of NZ women are travelling to areas controlled by the Islamic State the director of NZ SIS Rebecca Kitteridge reports. She was speaking to Parliaments Intelligence & Security Committee. Saying this trend is a real concern.

Mainstream Media will never report on the worries and fear of Rebecca Kitteridge post Ardern’s Labour Govt. Post the 15^th March 2019. Since then Ardern has purchased mainstream media. The mainstream media is aptly and deserve to be known as the propaganda machine. Targeting those that are loyal and love NZ, who want to preserve their traditions.

Whatever colour a NZrs skin, if you oppose the govts narratives the propaganda machine will label you a white supremacist, or a Right Wing Extremist’. If you are of Maori blood the Iwi Elite that collaborate, align them with Ardern will say that Pakeha made you do this, or try to shame you publicly. How demeaning, to say people can’t make up their own mind.

The real reason behind this is to ‘Shut down voices from speaking the truth publicly’. One way or another the truth will be told as God is my maker. The truth has left its footprint on this earth, and it lies within our hearts and souls it cannot be destroyed. God Save New Zealand.

WAKE UP NEW ZEALAND- Carol Sakey

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/291621/nz-women-going-to-is-areas-sis

https://www.rnz.co.nz/national/programmes/insight/audio/20175123/insight-for-19-april-2015-how-real-terrorism-threats-in-nz

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/291621/nz-women-going-to-ISIS a