DefendNZ Sought from the (OIA) Official Information  Act from the Ministry Of Health, which is reported by DefendNZ has left National Party Simon O’Connor disappointed but not surprised as the Ministry of Health says that patients with COVID19 could be eligible for euthanasia, assisted suicide in New Zealand. As in the light of the serious deficiencies in David Seymour’\s ‘End Of Life Choice Act (EOLCA) concerns have been raised by healthcare professionals.

COVID19 IN RELATION TO EUTHANASIA: The OIA Request asked the following question: “Could patients who are severely hospitalized with COVID19 potentially be eligible for assisted suicide or euthanasia under the Act if a health professional viewed their prognosis less than 6 months”?” The Defender NZ wanted clarity from the Ministry Of Health about this issue. The Defender refers to the precarious position when it comes to COVID19 and hospital resources and what could result in pressure to utilize euthanasia and assisted suicide as tools to resolve such a serious crisis, as overseas commentators had raised the prospect of unethical motivations since early in the pandemic. The Defender referred to the tragic case of a Canadian woman who had an assisted suicide to avoid another COVID19 lockdowns, thus highlighting exactly why caution is warranted in relation to COVID and euthanasia.

TERMINAL ILLNESS IS SUBJECTIVE: The lack -of stringent safeguards of Seymours Euthanasia Act has raised red flags, I myself in researching the Act have seen that there are some dangerous concepts in this Act. Therefore it appears to me its quite creditable to seek a response to this question through OIA to the Ministry Of Health, especially where there are vulnerable elderly people isolated and in lockdown, not seeing family, a situation that no-one has ever envisaged would happen. The Ministry of Health responded to the Defender on Tuesday 17th December 2021. The response was “There are clear eligibility criteria for assisted dying. This includes that a person must have a terminal illness that is LIKELY to end their life within 6 months.  Then the response goes onto say “A terminal illness is most often a prolonged illness where treatment is not effective. (the EOLC Act states that ‘eligibility is determined by the attending medical practitioner (AMP) and an independent practitioner. These are the serious concerns that have been raised “Firstly there is nothing CONCRETE about the PHRASE  ‘MOST OFTEN” in fact its inclusion in this specific context clearly suggests that the Ministry Of Health considers the definition of ‘TERMINAL ILLNESS’ to be ‘subjective’ and’ open to interpretation’. The next sentence on the MOH response appears to back this up, the MOH considers the attending medical practitioner (AMP)  and the independent medical practitioner to be empowered by the EOLCA to make the determination about ‘what does and does not qualify as a terminal illness’

PROLONGED ILLNESS: The Defender concludes “In the light of the vague interpretation, it is reasonable to suggest that COVID19 could be classed as a terminal illness depending on the prognosis of the patient and the subjective judgements of the AMP and independent medical practitioner. “This feels like we are being sold one thing and been delivered another”, said a spokesperson from The DefenderNZ.  In the final paragraph the Ministry Of Health added “Eligibility is determined by a case by case basis, therefore the Ministry cannot make definitive statements about who is eligible. In some cases a person with COVID19 may be eligible for assisted dying” The term ‘PROLONGED DESEASE’ is extremely fraught and highly subjective in nature. How does the Medical Practitioners determine an illness is a prolonged illness, and that persons life will end in 6 months, many medical professionals have been wrong in determining the time that a person life is going to end.  DefendNZ had created a petition to Parliament calling for urgent amendments to the Euthanasia Act. Scoop NZ reported 19th December 2021 An Official Information Act reply to #DefendNZ, from the Ministry of Health, which says that patients with COVID-19 could be eligible for euthanasia, has left National MP Simon O’Connor disappointed but not surprised., this news article confirmed Defend NZ concerns

CATEGORIZING HEALTH PROFESSIONALS: The Scoop News Article includes:- The End of Life Choice Act doesn’t offer any clarity or robust safeguards that would put this matter beyond doubt. Instead it does just the opposite, leaving the door wide open for abuse. When we put this matter to National MP Simon O’Connor, he expressed concerns about what clearly seems to be an expansion of the new law less than a month after it came into force. “When New Zealanders voted in the referendum in 2020, did they anticipate the law could be used for COVID-19 patients? The wording of the law was always deliberately broad and interpretable, placing far too much into the judgement of the doctor.” In 2022 the government made changes to the Health Practitioner Status as to how a qualified health practitioner can carry out some activities that they could not before, these activities prior to this could only be done by a medical practitioner. Changes across eight Acts amend references to medical practitioners to include health practitioners including nurse practitioners, registered nurses and, in one instance, pharmacist prescribers. By replacing the term ‘medical practitioner’, other health practitioners who are suitably qualified will be able to use the full range of their skills and training in treating people.

HEALTH PROFESSIONALS COMPETENCE: Nursing is a regulated profession, and it is important that nurses understand the requirements of regulation, their obligations under the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance (HPCA) Act 2003 and what this means in terms of their professional responsibility and accountability. It is the responsibility of every nurse to know and understand the legislative frameworks they work within. The Health Practitioners’ Competence Assurance Act was passed in September 2003 and has undergone several amendments since then. The HPCA Act (2003) was developed in response to: very public examples of medical error; demands from lobbyists to make health professionals more accountable and respect health care consumers’ rights; needing to streamline some of the bureaucratic processes by having main health professional groups under one piece of legislation; needing to update older legislation, like the 1977 Nurses’ Act. The principal purpose of the Act is to protect the health and safety of members of the public by providing for mechanisms to ensure that health practitioners are competent and fit to practice their professions.

The Health Practitioners Competence Assurance (HPCA) Act (2003) includes provisions that:- Prohibit persons who are not qualified to be registered as health practitioners of a profession from claiming or implying to be health practitioners of that profession.   *Prohibit persons other than registered health practitioners of a profession with current practicing certificates from claiming to be practicing the profession.    *Prohibit health practitioners from practicing their professions without current practicing certificates or from practicing their professions outside their scopes of practice.   *Authorize the making of Orders in Council restricting the provision of the whole or part of certain health services to health practitioners who are permitted to perform those activities by their scopes of practice.

HEALTH PROFESSIONALS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL: The Act also sets out conditions a health professional must meet in order to practice; provides mechanisms for improving the competence of health practitioners to provide protection from practitioners who practice below that required standard of competence or are unable to perform the functions required; provides for each regulatory authority to establish a professional conduct committee to investigate complaints about health practitioners; and provides for the establishment of a single tribunal, called the Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal, to hear charges brought by the Director of Proceedings or by a professional conduct committee against a practitioner. Professions currently regulated by the Act (2003) include: Chinese medicine services  *Chiropractic    *Medicine    *Dentistry  *Occupational therapy   *Optometry and optical dispensing  *Nursing *Midwifery  *Medical imaging and radiation therapy   *Dietetics  *Medical laboratory science. Anesthetic technology    *Osteopathy   *Paramedic services    *Pharmacy   *Physiotherapy   *Podiatry   *Psychology and psychotherapy.

MIDAZOLAM INJECTIONS AND DEATHS: NZ Herald reported  11th July 2023 that a NZ Health worker is under investigation for raising assisted suicide with a suicidal patient. It was one of eight complaints made to the Health and Disability Commission about the Assisted Dying Service in the last year. So far, no one involved in the service had broken the law. ResearchGate reported January 2023 there were excess deaths in the UK: Midazolam and Euthanasia in the COVID 19 Pandemic. It was found that a spike in deaths were not caused by COVID19 this was largely absent but was due to Midazolam injections, with excess of all deaths in England during 2020.  The widespread use of Midazolam in the UK suggests a possible policy of systemic  euthanasia. Australia at this time were assessing the statical impact of COVID19 injections on excess deaths which is reported to be relatively straight forward. It was reported that the iatrogenic pandemic in the UK was caused by euthanasia deaths from Midazolam and also it is highly likely caused by COVID19 injections.  It was through spikes shown in stats at the time when elderly people were given Midazolam and COVID jabs that this was determined by researchers. (through Macro data)

MORE PEOPLE DIE THAN NEEDED TO DIE: Dr John Campbell in his You Tube video explains why there is a question mark around Euthanasia and End Of live and Assisted Suicide. Did more people die from the Pandemic than needed to die?  Dr Campbell says there is a serious National question in the UK as to what the UK apply to the Pandemic and ongoing into the future “did more people die in the Pandemic than needed to die  and did some people die as a result of the medical interventions that were recommended at the time. (Dr Campbell shows the spikes in several graphs of deaths). He speaks of the guidelines around breathlessness referring to an opioid and a benzodiazepine an opium based drug like morphine and the bendo-benzodiazepine as they talk about this as namely midazolam, this is usually used for those dying of cancer so that they have a peaceful death. Dr Camerson says under these situations all is ok but for an infection such as COVID19 this is fundamentally a mistake that was made in the transfer guidelines . Medication used at the end of life and assisted dying for an infection that most people can get completely better from

JABBING THE ELERLY WHO ARE FRAIL: Here in New Zealand Newshub reported on 18th January 2021 ‘COVID19” No cause for alarm after 29 elderly people die in Norway following Pfizer jab- says expert’. The Norwegian Medicines Agency said in a statement some common reactions to the vaccine may have contributed to their deaths, which was to be expected in frail patients. University of Auckland vaccinologist Helen Petousis-Harris said there’s no indication the two are linked and the virus itself poses a much greater threat to the age bracket.. However she also added  I think this is something that we have expected,” she told Newshub. “When you start vaccinating the extremely elderly – these are very, very frail people – you are, by chance, going to see deaths occurring shortly after.”. The deaths prompted the Norwegian Institute of Public Health to suggest in a statement the vaccines may be too risky for the very elderly and terminally ill. “As a result, the Norwegian Institute of Public Health has updated the COVID-19 vaccination guide with more detailed advice on vaccinating the elderly who are frail. “Several reports of suspected adverse reactions are received on a daily basis and are continuously assessed.”. The New Zealand Government has signed agreements with a total of four companies to secure enough vaccine doses for its entire population, with the rollout expected to begin in the second quarter of this year.

COVID POSITIVE TEST DETERMINES COVID MORTALITY UN NATION STATES (WHO): Mainstream media including RNZ and also Ministry of Health NZ reported that the measuring and reporting of COVID19 deaths had changed. The Ministry of Health that week reported deaths of COVID19  at (25th March 2022)  But these figures are not transparent there is another story behind the figures reported. The way COVID19 deaths were being recorded had changed. It was early in the March that Ashley Bloomfield announced a change in the reporting of COVID19 mortality rates in NZ. From the 10th March onwards deaths were to  be automatically reported if a person died within 28 days of a positive COVID19 test result. This same system was to be used worldwide as a request from the World Health Organization (UN). So if some-one died of a vehicle accident, had been shot be the police, or any other category of death is they had been tested for COVID and the test came up positive then they were categorized as dying of COVID19. Of course this can hide the  COVID jab mortality as well also suicide deaths and other deaths for any other reason. Thus having the ability to hide a raft of serious concerns around health and the way people have been treated. Michael Baker Otago epidemiologist said it was worth considering how valis some of the cases listed as deaths of COVID 19 are. Baker referred this to being a broad definition. Baker says it’s worth having a “healthy suspicion for every bit of data

INCREASING THE FEAR AND BOOSTING THE JABS: University of Canterbury Covid-19 modeler professor Michael Plank says people who died within 28 days of testing positive is a “number that you can easily count, and you can provide quickly. Saying there’s an increasing likelihood that some of those deaths will be what’s called incidental, which means that yes they died within 28 days of a positive test but the cause of death was actually unrelated”. Baker said “this is a simple death count] is a key indicator that a disease … is having an impact” As to ‘Vaccination status of deaths within 28 days of being reported as a case stating PLEASE NOTE: The Ministry of Health states the number of deaths of partially vaccinated people are too small to provide additional detail of for privacy reasons. But again I say this form of counting  COVID19 deaths can hide a mirage of other deaths including that of Jab Deaths. 3st March 2022 The NZ Herald reported that COVID19 “What we know and what we don’t know about NZ Virus Deaths. It was reported that COVID19 deaths would rise and remain high, but experts say a dearth of detailed data is clouding the picture of just who is becoming severely sick and who is dying from COVID19 and refers to deaths as in COVId19 positive test and people dying within 28 days of the test being positive and dying in that period of time

WHERE’S THE DATA? The Chief Coroner’s office told the Herald this week it was investigating 25 active cases where the deceased person tested positive at death, with no determinations yet made in any of them. No data was available to offer a breakdown of what variants and subvariants were involved in the deaths. Director general of health Dr Ashley Bloomfield said the number of deaths linked to Covid-19 appeared to be rising – Generally, however, O’Neale and Harvey said analyzing the precise risk of death and hospitalization in New Zealand by vaccination status was difficult, given a lack of publicly reported data from the Ministry of Health. Then there has been a number of hacks reported by mainstream news of health data and coroners records, thousands of coronial files and health files. For me red flags are flying.17th January 2023 Stuff NZ ‘Hacked NZ Information published on the dark web. (14,500 Coronial files and 4,000 post mortem reports). Te Whatu Ora hacked files hacked health data and coronial inquest files hacked. TRANSPARENCY ZILCH. RED FLAGS. HOW EASILY HEALTH RECORDS, AND CORONIAL FILES – INFORMATION CAN SIMPLY DISAPPEAR INTO THE DARK WEB-



COVID 19 Blog Posts View all Categories

Carol Sakey


Barry Young was the only provider of the data because we are a small population. Many experts around the world agree with and say Barry’s evidence is spot on absolutely correct Te Whatu Ora does not seem to want to argue anything about the data, just that he leaked info. Hey but Government depts, on in NZ is at risk of being hacked through govt agencies they were given a warning in 2019 that their security system is at high risk, needs updating, not adequately secure. Still they are seeking experts to make the system more secure. Yet they blame Barry. No, Barry did not leak any personal names, no personal info, but the inadequacies, neglect of govt agencies are guilty. Of breaching well over 28,000 New Zealanders cyber attacked data over the last few years including data that has included names, addresses etc., some already found on the dark web, as announced in a speech in the House. (Parliament). Govt depts commissioned Mercury IT owned up to the data leak coming from a cyber attack on them. The Gun Buy Back Scheme 2019 a large cyber attack, with gun owners names, addresses sand other info that left serious concerns for gun owners that crims may come a calling. And the criminal world that this info would be most useful too.

Every single persons data has been a security risk, globally this is happening and more so since COVID Pandemic. We are talking masses of health files, corona’s files, clinical files, cardiovascular and heart disease data files. Where doctors at the Waikato hospital had to write patients notes on a white board because the whole system crashed.  Will Te Whatu Ora..Health N Z have a public hearing with Barry, of course not. They are trying to pin him down, make him go away for the evidence he does have, and now the world also has.  Whatever the Court concludes the factual evidence is not going away its out there in the big vast world, a masses of people are now waking up to the weapon of health. I thought that Voices of Freedom were standing up for the people of New Zealand, I have to wonder why they did not speak up??  Why did you not speak up Chantel Baker??? And still I do not hear any support coming from Voices Of Freedom for Barry.   I never joined Voices Of Freedom, I am pretty much a loan researcher, the seeker of the truth, and that’s the way I like it.


Carol Sakey


Auckland University Website published on 27th May 2021 that Auckland Scientists are to lead the largest ever vaccine monitoring study . A Global Collaboration in New Zealand that will access the safety of COVID-19 vaccine on a massive scale. (yes New Zealanders were the massive guineapigs that were being monitored. The Global Vaccine  Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) with its 21 partners in 17 countries were awarded funds by the CDC to monitor 300 million people for vax side effects. Dr Fran Priddy was the Clinical Director of the Vaccine Alliance Aotearoa New Zealand – Ohu Kaupare Huaketo

Dr Fran Priddy stated “ Post-approval monitoring of vaccine safety is critical for COVID-19 vaccines which will be administered rapidly to populations including children and immunocompromised people across the globe. We have already seen how strong monitoring systems in the US and Europe have identified rare adverse events and led to rapid changes in vaccine policy. That the global vaccine monitoring capacity of the Global Data Network Program is critical because it links safety data across many more countries and populations than any individual country could do alone. And it allows countries with less capacity to participate in a rigorous monitoring program. The GVDN’s very large and coordinated database can more accurately and rapidly detect and understand safety issues, which will benefit us all.

This article also reads: Conflict of interest statement: Dr Priddy is Clinical Director of the Government-funded Vaccine Alliance Aotearoa New Zealand – Ohu Kaupare Huaketo, a partnership between the Malaghan Institute, the University of Otago and Victoria University of Wellington

She was also asked “How did this project arise? Associate Professor Helen Petousis -Harris, the Co-Director of the Global Vaccine Data Network, vacinologist, University of Auckland made the following comment as to ‘What will the Global Vaccine Data Network do? The response was “The GVDN will facilitate studies of vaccine safety and effectiveness using health data from diverse populations around the world. Serious adverse events following vaccination are extremely rare, so scientists need to study very large populations.”

A global collaboration helmed in New Zealand will help assess the safety of COVID-19 vaccines on a massive scale.

The Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN), with its 21 partners in 17 countries, has been awarded funds by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to monitor 300 million people for vaccine side-effects.

The SMC asked independent experts and the project’s co-director to comment on the research. 

Dr Fran Priddy, Clinical Director Vaccine Alliance Aotearoa New Zealand – Ohu Kaupare Huaketo: “Post-approval monitoring of vaccine safety is critical for COVID-19 vaccines which will be administered rapidly to populations including children and immunocompromised people across the globe. We have already seen how strong monitoring systems in the US and Europe have identified rare adverse events and led to rapid changes in vaccine policy.

“The global vaccine monitoring capacity of the Global Vaccine Data Network program is critical because it links safety data across many more countries and populations than any individual country could do alone. And it allows countries with less capacity to participate in a rigorous monitoring program. The GVDN’s very large and coordinated database can more accurately and rapidly detect and understand safety issues, which will benefit us all. “This knowledge is key to vaccine safety and acceptance to improve vaccination rates and control the pandemic. It is encouraging to see that the US CDC recognizes and supports the need for a global approach and that Dr. Petousis-Harris and her team at University of Auckland have been selected to lead this program.” Conflict of interest statement: Dr Priddy is Clinical Director of the Government-funded Vaccine Alliance Aotearoa New Zealand – Ohu Kaupare Huaketo, a partnership between the Malaghan Institute, the University of Otago and Victoria University of Wellington.

Associate Professor Helen Petousis-Harris, Co-Director, Global Vaccine Data Network; and vaccinologist, University of Auckland referred to facilitating studies of vaccine safety and effectiveness.  But did the government say these jabs were safe and effective. Why would you have do this massive study to monitor safety when the jab is already being rolled out. Come on people, wake up to NZ the Guineapig State and funded by the CDC

What will the Global Vaccine Data Network do? “The GVDN will facilitate studies of vaccine safety and effectiveness using health data from diverse populations around the world. Serious adverse events following vaccination are extremely rare, so scientists need to study very large populations.”

How did this project arise? “Scientists saw a need for increased collaboration on vaccine monitoring even before Covid-19 struck. Modern computing power and statistical techniques make it technically possible to do massive studies. The Gates Foundation funded an initial meeting in France in 2019, which laid the groundwork for the project now unfolding.”

What regions are represented? “Countries across Europe, the Americas, Asia, Africa and Western Pacific are represented. Partner sites can be research institutions, universities or hospitals. Some countries have multiple sites. The aim is to add even more countries and sites.”

How was the figure of around 300 million people being monitored arrived at? “It is an estimate based on the number of people each site is working with. Some sites are monitoring just a portion of the country’s population while others like the New Zealand site will monitor the entire population. It is also anticipated that new sites will join the collaboration.”

How will monitoring work? “The GVDN will undertake a number of critical activities associated with Covid-19 vaccines. Firstly, it will establish the normal background rates of a range of medical conditions of special interest. It will then assess if more cases of various medical conditions arise after vaccination than might normally be expected. The network will also compare the outcomes of different vaccines, scan for potential unexpected events and perform studies that compare vaccinated people with unvaccinated people. These are all things that are normally done in many countries. What makes the GVDN different is that by using the same methods at all partner sites, we can essentially do the biggest vaccine studies ever undertaken.”

Does monitoring imply scientists are worried about the safety of these vaccines? “No. Vaccines have been tested in clinical studies and are now being closely monitored as we use them. Covid-19 vaccines are helping populations around the world to avoid untold suffering and death and to start coming out of long lockdowns. Serious adverse reactions are extremely rare.”

Is this project just about Covid-19? “The funding from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is specifically for Covid-19 related work but the GVDN is set up to co-ordinate studies of vaccine safety and effectiveness for any vaccine. It aims to do similar global studies on other vaccines in the future.”

Dr Petousis-Harris is the co-director of the Global Vaccine Data Network.



Carol Sakey

Secret Jab Exemptions for Healthcare Workers in New Zealand Come to Light (October 3rd 2023)


On 15 November 2021 all healthcare workers in New Zealand — doctors, nurses, dentists, pharmacists, midwives and the like — were required to have had their first covid Jab. The covid Jab mandate lasted until late September 2022.

Just tonight I learned that over 11,000 workers received “12A Exemptions” during this period from an Official Information Act request to Te Whatu Ora (Health New Zealand), the health service agency that absorbed the District Health Boards and manages all public health services nationwide.


5th July 2023  The Official Information Act reads as follows:-

“According to the legislation at the time in 2021, there were operational exemptions 
available for those who were not getting vaccinated against Covid 19. Your website outlines 
the process of applying for an operating exemption under clause 12a

Kindly share: 
How many requests were received? 
How many were approved by the ministry?” 

From 13 November 2021 to 26 September 2022, a total of 478 applications for Significant Service
Disruption exemption (SSD) were received. 103 applications were granted, covering approximately
11,005 workers.

Please note that it is not possible to provide the exact number of workers that were covered by
SSDs. This is because it was possible for an organization to submit an application to cover more
than one worker.

Carol Sakey

Open letter to officials on the effects of the COVID-19 injections. October 13, 2023

Dear Prime Minister, Minister of Health, MedSAFE General Manager, Director General of Health, Police Commissioner, major party leaders, President of RNZCGP, Human Rights Commissioner, Ombudsman, Chief Coroner, Chairman of the MCNZ, Chairman of the DCNZ, all Members of Parliament.

Urgent Open Letter on the latest clear proof of multiple modes of harm from the COVID-19 injections. 

Summary of published research from the last 3 months.

Since we last wrote to update you variously on the confirmation and mechanisms of widespread harm from the COVID-19 vaccine products, more research and disclosures have become public, each of which we summarize for you briefly in this letter. It is urgent that you act to cease the COVID-19 vaccine rollouts immediately.

In case you can read no further, an expert symposium has reported this week, based on published peer-reviewed research, that Comirnaty contains, along with heavy DNA contamination, a promoter code from a known cancer-causing virus called SV40. Urgent Expert Hearing on Reports of DNA Contamination in mRNA Vaccines.  We have posted on the broader concerns and very troubling evidence on cancer particularly. Here is one world renowned oncologist describing the harm he sees, and another cancer specialist here.

Of concern, too, many patients have ongoing vaccine spike protein production in their blood after 6 months according to new research from Italy. So much for “all gone in a few days”.

Also, it is clear that the final product is NOT the version that Pfizer submitted to the world’s regulators for approval. Here is the BMJ paper of concern, and an interview with the author, who discusses the substantial changes in production processes, which does make them different products, by any usual standards of medicines regulation.

We note you remain in denial about, or resistant to, the notion of any harm from the jab program, which continues into vulnerable demographics – particularly young adults, children and unborn babies who are all at minimal risk, if any, from COVID-19 infection. There is clear evidence from around the world of mortality harm from the gene products, here for instance and rising proof that early treatments could save lives if doctors who tried to use them hadn’t been threatened and persecuted.

Our prior calls to your integrity, public duty, common sense and self-preservation have failed to stop both the continued hawking of dangerous genetic technologies onto our citizens, and the hiding of the resultant toll of deaths and severe injuries. Irrespective of any efficacy at all (only negative so far) these contaminated jabs contain a witch’s brew of known and unknown substances. There is enormous batch to batch variability with regard to incidence and types of adverse events as we have described previously. That they contain undisclosed ingredients ought to be enough to end this letter here, confident that action would follow. However, denial, wilfull blindness or lazy deference to “government experts” continue to writ large in Wellington.

Ongoing synthetic gene injections into a vulnerable population in the foreknowledge of inevitable deaths and injuries to come is surely a crime (even if protections may be promised to complicit individuals by people in power). The Crimes Act is highly explicit about what constitutes criminal behaviour.

Our multiple letters to you, and ongoing public posts here at NZDSOS, broaden the evidence available so that you cannot claim any statutory protection from having made fair and reasonable decisions on merely limited (government-sanctioned) information.

It is clear that protecting children and pregnant women and their babies, at least, is no longer an ethical bar of interest for some doctors, but we urge you, in the name of humanity, to consider the consequences of your actions here and now, and for future generations to come. Thank you for reading this far.

Risk vs Benefit:- The definitive proof that the risks of modified RNA injections exceed any benefits remains the 2022 paper by Fraiman, Greenland, Cohen, Doshi et al. The ratio is strongly negative. There was documented fraud in the Pfizer approval trial anyway, and more people died in the treatment group than the control group, particularly from heart attacks. If there was a deadly virus and the ‘vaccine’ worked, we would expect to see the opposite.
Negative efficacy:- Deceptive mis-categorisation of vaccine status continues to propagate the widespread untruth that the jabs reduce serious illness, hospitalisations and death. On the contrary, it is the multiple jabs that are bearing the burden of COVID-19 infection, as discussed by computational biologist Dr Jessica Rose.

The Cleveland Clinic study confirms the negative efficacy loud and clear. The “surprising finding” to the researchers was that the more jabs one had, the higher the chances of catching COVID-19 This will be the personal experience or observations of some of you, no doubt. The trial and commentary by an independent data analyst. We have sent you similar findings since the studies started emerging.

Contamination and failure of Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP)

We have written extensively on the Latypova and Watt disclosures that show the US rollout is owned and operated by the US military, as a prototype countermeasure against a manufactured viral bioweapon. It is unclear what legal pathways exist in New Zealand, however, to suspend GMP, human testing and give civilian agencies both liability protection and irrelevance, as is the situation in the US.

Evidence for high variability in batch toxicity and thus contamination is now absolute, as discussed here by cardiologist and COVID-19 early treatment expert, Dr Peter McCullough.

Bacterial plasmid DNA was expected in tiny amounts from the scaled-up production process, but McKernan et al found very high levels, detailed in the urgent hearing already discussed above. This may be the source of the reverse transcription into the human genome that we have informed you about. Plasmids are, by their nature, certain to integrate into host DNA, including into the microbiome, turning gut bacteria into a potential spike protein factory forever, along with human cells. The same research proved the presence of SV40 virus oncogenic (cancer-causing) genetic code in the synthetic RNA shots. We have posted on all this since May.  This can be for no other purpose than to ensure integration into human DNA. This work has since been validated elsewhere.

By any account, not just that of oncologists, this should justify an investigation. Of course, the latest cancer statistics are unavailable but reports from health workers, patients and death notices give credence to an international cancer tragedy unfolding.

Heart damage: Serious cardiac adverse effects remain a major concern. A new Japanese study published in the top-tier journal Radiology shows that ALL vaccinated people have measurable cardiac stress following injection though they have no warning symptoms. The Swiss study we have discussed before is now published and peer-reviewed. This is also highly alarming and suggests too that almost everyone injected got a degree of heart damage. Actual symptomatic cardiac inflammation was seen in 1 in 35 (2.8%) of these 777 health workers in this study of the 3rd dose. (Swiss Study)

We have reported on similar studies before, eg the Thai teens study showing a 3.5% incidence of myo- or pericarditis in the boys. Yet here this has not justified stopping the rollout. These levels of harm from the jabs, in groups unaffected by severe covid anyway, are beyond any justification, as is your silence. It is simply a lie that covid would be worse than the jabs in these patients, nor is the jab myocarditis mild and self-limiting. Heart muscle cells cannot be replaced once they have died. For instance, 58% of post-jab myocarditis was still present at a year on MRI follow-up, as reported by a Hong Kong Study

We note that the NZ myocarditis study was supposed to be published early this year but now requests for updates on when it will be published are ignored. We continue to wait patiently for its findings. (There is a CDC study similarly being delayed). Far from being “vanishingly rare” the NZ researchers could select from over a thousand cases of post-vaccine cardiac inflammation supplied by MoH.

A recent Italian report documents late relapses in young subjects, with scar formation, which can lead to sudden fatal cardiac arrest, particularly in teens participating in sport, or during sleep. The medical reasons for this are no mystery. Meanwhile, multiple studies do NOT show the virus itself to cause significant myocarditis, as claimed by vaccine promoters. One is discussed by a cardiologist here.

Immune damage:-Repeated injections of the novel spike RNA are damaging immune responses, not just against the ability to clear COVID-19 and provide lasting actual immunity. Research shows multiple jabs cause IgG4 class switching and immune paralysis. This causes a tolerance situation, not just to repeated chronic infections but to cancer cells in the body that the immune system would otherwise destroy..

Computational biologist Dr Jessica Rose discusses IgG4-mediated immune tolerance, failure and fibrosis. Vaccinated children’s immune defense’s against all pathogens have been shown to be defective in a recent paper

Someone has to protect patients (and not from “disinfo doctors”)

Surely you can see the ongoing waves of PCR positivity and the new ‘variants’ escaping vaccine-induced antibodies, despite – our evidence has demonstrated because of –  your claimed 92% vaccination rate? Our Department of Justice advised the government that the jabs had to prevent transmission to justify mandating, but was ignored.

We disagree that the mandates were ever justified at all. They are an offence to human decency and intelligence as well as medical ethics and NZ Bill Of Rights Act. Mandating experimental gene transfer technology for a flu-level illness was never justified, as we have told you repeatedly. The government’s own medical experts advised only one NON-MANDATED jab for children but were rebuffed by Dr Bloomfield, and that the jab would not protect people from infecting each other, as in this, one of many illuminating documents released under OIA requests.

Your lack of oversight (at best) has harmed the nation, causing death. There were 64,800 adverse event reports before CARM stopped formal reporting, over 11,000 of them serious (but 7000 of these ‘went missing’ in the MoH and weren’t recorded on the Medsafe website, per an OIA response).  Hundreds of deaths were reported. The hospitals are overwhelmed, and full of excess vascular, cardiac and neurological cases, according to multiple accounts from staff and patients.

The Medical Council of New Zealand’s (MCNZ) action as political commissars enforcing obedience to anti-ethical dictates has silenced the medical profession’s traditional role as conscientious guardians, allowing an amoral landscape for commercial and political interests to run riot. MCNZ seems to be acting for the Federation of State Medical Boards, a private US pharma-funded corporation, not the NZ public. We have documented this extensively and continue to cry foul. We are in litigation to get this stopped.

The government has changed the Coroners Act which will aid and abet any cover-up and the ongoing silence on the many sudden and unexplained deaths, and tragedies all. No longer must a cause of death be discovered. A thousand-year-old common law principle has been shattered. Are we happy with this, as a society? Not only is death from “unascertained natural causes” deeply unsatisfactory, but it is also a lie in many of these cases. McCullough et al have just shown that properly performed autopsied reveal the jab as the universal cause in most sudden deaths following vaccination. We have written with serious concerns to coroners and pathologists about various suspicious cases, with near universal lack of response.

Rising death rates in vaccinated countries: Edward Dowd is a successful Wall Street data analyst. His recent book Cause Unknown quantifies the rise in death and disability that insurance companies are reporting amongst jabbed people with extensive references, and heart-rending photographs of many young lives lost already.

Rising all cause mortality is reflected in the hard data from government and insurance actuaries around the world e.g. the Euromomo report on elevated child deaths, as well as people in our small connected country dying suddenly.

Ongoing sudden deaths and disabilities continue amongst Kiwis, and many are young. At some point, these deaths will be properly examined and atoned for. The carpet is simply not large enough to conceal the growing pile of bodies being swept under it.  In the meantime circumstantial proof that corrupted and coerced institutions, and the people in them, are complicit in mass harm continues to accrue:

  • cessation of regular safety reports by Medsafe;
  • inadequate post-death investigations;
  • irregularities, conflicts and inconsistencies from bodies like CARM and ISMB;
  • refusal or long delays in response from public guardians like the Police, Ombudsman, Health and Disability Commissioner and Human Rights Commissioner;
  • dismayed funeral directors speaking out;
  • refusal to provide ACC cover for obvious injuries;
  • an obedient press that refuses to ask questions or cover the obvious harms and risks from the jabs;
  • some brave medical specialists starting to admit that they were mistaken in putting all faith in the wait for a jab, any jab;
  • and whistle-blowers from NZ’s health bureaucracy, St. Johns, midwifery, and community health.

All tell the same story of overwhelming sickness and unprecedented rates of all the same illnesses reported to Pfizer as soon as widespread administration of the jabs began – clots, embolisms, strokes, heart attacks and chest pain, neurological syndromes, autoimmune diseases, cancers and adverse pregnancy outcomes. The company tried to suppress them, but failed.

Ivermectin just won’t die: Meanwhile, the evidence for early treatments, particularly ivermectin, continues to strengthen. It is summarised here, and here at, a comparator site of all the evidence for early and late treatments, pharmaceutical and natural. Peru is the latest real-world laboratory proving early treatments are successful, and many lives could have been saved here at home had Pfizer’s contract with the government not forced actual treatments underground. Some doctors were punished for following the highest level 1 evidence supporting ivermectin, a fully approved medicine, while at the same time, an experimental provisionally-approved injection was forced on people, including children and the pregnant. This is on top of the already severe consequences for those who tried to follow the Medicines Act, medical oaths and their consciences in questioning the jab.
Other mandates without informed consent:- Recent changes to the Medicines Act, and pronouncements by the vaccine industry and its partners at the WHO, have set the scene for endless genetically engineered injections to treat anything and everything. Medical regulators are now redefining themselves as facilitators for innovation rather than safety agencies. Is this the direction the public wishes to go, as the Therapeutic Products Act removes not just natural health products, but a wide range of practitioners and modalities that rely on them to help patients?

If any more confirmation were needed that actual health is of little interest to this government, we note the recent confirmation from the US government’s National Toxicology Program that water fluoridation does indeed harm developing brains, as if more research were needed.  The Ministry of Health has just revealed it has not assessed this significant development as it forces fluoridation on local communities by edict. MoH is facing an injunction from various local communities as we write. The overall meta-analysis results showed a 5 point average reduction in child IQ scores (similar to the harm from lead which got it removed finally from petrol). There is damage to all aspects of brain function, not just intelligence, which will undermine our social and intellectual capital. We urge the complete cessation of adding a known industrial toxicant to the water.

Is there a pattern here?: Most of the world no longer fluoridates but NZ ploughs on, in the same way is it continues to promote covid jabs for all, despite all evidence to the contrary, and as other developed countries scale back their recommendations. If these are not all crimes against humanity we would like an explanation why, and how the identified perpetrators will escape justice.

Some of them are trying to hide behind the WHO, which is making it’s orders compulsory rather than voluntary and removing any deference to human rights and freedoms, and can enforce its edicts on us even before any actual emergency, as part of merely ‘planning or preparing’ for one. We do not doubt future attempts to assault human freedoms on other very dishonest grounds, and note the government’s work potentially to undermine private property rights – the very definition of successful Marxism – under the guise of ‘modelling’ that predicts climate catastrophe for New Zealand’s coastal and low lying areas. We could have our real estate stolen with no recourse to the courts, and be ‘resettled’, no doubt forcibly, to a 15-minute city of the regime’s choosing.

Final appeal to protect the public: Thankfully, the truth will flourish at some point and the people will have their say. Perhaps they are already, with dramatically declining appetite for endless shots with zero clinical or even rational basis for them. However, you must stop these dangerous injections in view of this further evidence undermining ‘safe and effective’, especially of contamination and carcinogenicity risk. Despite being the eve of a general election, do not leave it to the next parliament to consider. We say that is already too late for many thousands of Kiwis.

Yours sincerely,

The 280+ doctors, dentists and other professionals at NZDSOS, the 50,600 Kiwis who have signed our declaration, and on behalf of everyone in our shared home.

Our posts at contain many more references to the above. Any links to commentary articles always link to the original reference.