ACT PARTY DELETES CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY ‘STUFF NZ 27th February 2016 (Article Henry Cooke)

ACT deletes climate change policy from their website

ACT has removed their climate change policy from their website – reportedly on the same day leader David Seymour launched a blistering attack on the Green Party’s environmental record.  ….The 2008 policy, which claimed New Zealand was not warming and pledged to withdraw the country from the Kyoto Protocol, was unavailable on the ACT Party’s website as of Friday evening.

“New Zealand is not warming,” the Policy Paper said “If it were to warm moderately, we would likely benefit in terms of land-based production, human health and reduced heating bills. Arguments that we would lose from sea-level rise or more extreme events are unproven conjectures.”

Links to the policy are still catalogued by Google and a cached version is available. A user on Reddit said that the policy was available on the website as late as Friday morning, but this claim could not be independently verified.

Seymour released a scathing attack on the Green Party on Friday, stating they did “bugger all for the environment”.  Reached by telephone on Saturday morning, Seymour did not confirm or deny the deletion of the policy. David Seymour responded “The thing about websites is that you can always say that something was or wasn’t on a website at some point in the past,”….And added  “It’s the easiest thing in the world to claim and impossible to prove.”

Seymour called later to confirm that the policy had been on the website’s server but not actively linked to for “a long time – at least two years.”. He emphasized that his party was focusing on the 2017 election, not the past. He suspected that media were being tipped off about the deletion by someone in the Green Party, “who have been underperforming at representing NZ on the environment. …. Saying “I know which election I’m focusing on. If they want to focus on another one they are welcome to.”

The ACT Party are holding their annual conference at Orakei Bay this weekend, and a focus on the environment is suspected. Seymour said the party had never denied the existence of climate change. He described himself as a “luke-warmer. Saying that “I believe it is real, and a portion of it is manmade, but I question the extent to which it is dangerous,” he then said “Since the industrial revolution we’ve increased the concentration of C02 by about 100 part per million. No question about that.”

In the  first page of the deleted policy paper:- He called for a more scientific and mature discussion of the issue. Saying “I think it is time for a slightly more intelligent debate. Otherwise its a bit like being back in the playground – ‘Are you are a denier or are you a good person?  It’s all a bit puerile.” And – “It’s actually a scientific debate – and quite a complex one.”

Stuff

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/77338800/act-delete-climate-change-policy-from-their-website

David Seymour launches attack on Greens, says they’re ‘doing bugger all for the environment’

ACT leader David Seymour is talking up his green credentials, and trashing the Greens. . Photo: DAVID WHITE / FAIRFAX NZ

ACT leader David Seymour is readying to fire shots across the Green Party bow, accusing them of “socialist economics” and neglecting the environment. He said they also “just really piss me off”.  The rank and file behind the single-MP party will gather at Auckland’s exclusive Orakei Bay this weekend for their annual conference, which is expected to carry a heavy environmental theme. It’s understood Seymour will announce an environmental policy, geared around private enterprise playing a greater role in conservation.

It’s unclear exactly what that will include, but is expected to centre on Government incentives to increase private environmental custodianship, and moves to better define ownership. Seymour was keen to boost the party’s environmental credentials, saying they had gone under-reported in the past.

And he took issue with the “hypocrisy of the Greens”,  monopolizing environmental issues. “They have squatted on this piece of political real estate, while doing bugger all for the environment and often doing things that are counter-productive, because they don’t understand markets.

“They annoy me enormously, and I just think it’s wrong because I actually do care about the environment and I think it’s an important part of being a New Zealander,” he said. “What you’ve got is a group of people who are actually running a completely separate agenda which is socialist-economics, and neglecting [the environment]. “The reality is they just piss me off.”

He cited a bill by Green MP Gareth Hughes last year, which sought to regulate the buy-back rate that electricity retailers charged people selling solar power back into the grid. “If his bill had succeeded then you would have ended up with retailers saying we don’t want to be in business, and if you’d set it too low then people considering installing solar panels would have said the returns aren’t as good as they could be

“It’s one little example of a supposedly environmental party, with a supposedly environmental policy which if it had succeeded, would have actually reduced the uptake of solar one way or another, and increased emissions from the New Zealand electricity industry.”.. Green Party co-leader James Shaw declined to comment, but a Green party spokesperson said Seymour’s gestures appeared token. .. ACT seems to be claiming some kind of road to Damascus epiphany that the environment is worth saving.

“David could start by supporting our call for a moratorium on further dairy conversions on the Waikato River to help make it swimmable again.”.. Seymour’s keynote address would focus heavily on what he calls the four Ps of free-market environmentalism – private initiative, property rights, pricing and prosperity.  ACT members looking to flash their green side will also be able to book a ride in a Tesla S – an electric powered sports car that can outpace most high-performance sports vehicles.

Others lined up to speak at the conference would cover child poverty, the Government’s position on superannuation and victim support.

– Stuff

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/77288879/david-seymour-launches-attack-on-greens-says-theyre-doing-bugger-all-for-the-environment

Nick Kearney ACT Climate Policy 2008

In 2008, the ACT Party’s climate policy, supported by candidates like Nick Kearney (who stood for the party in the North Shore electorate that year), was rooted in climate skepticism and opposition to government intervention in the economy.

2008 ACT Climate Policy Highlights:-

Climate Skepticism: The party’s official 2008 policy paper explicitly stated that “New Zealand is not warming”. It argued that moderate warming would likely benefit New Zealand through increased land productivity and reduced heating bills.                                                                                                                                                                                                               Opposition to Kyoto Protocol: ACT pledged to withdraw New Zealand from the Kyoto Protocol, describing the arguments for sea-level rise and extreme weather events as “unproven conjectures”.

Opposition to the ETS: ACT was a vocal critic of the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) introduced by the Labour government in September 2008. To protest the legislation, the party famously performed street theatre featuring a “witch” whipping a “farmer” who was dragging a large cheque made out to Russia for $5 billion, representing the cost to taxpayers.

Alternative Energy: Rather than carbon mitigation, the party argued for investment in “proper alternatives” such as nuclear power, while dismissing renewable energy like wind and solar as unachievable and unnecessary for cutting emissions.  Nick Kearney’s Role in 2008:- Candidate Stance: As the ACT candidate for North Shore in 2008, Kearney adhered to the party’s platform of fiscal conservatism and limited regulation.

Review of ETS: Following the 2008 election, ACT entered a confidence-and-supply agreement with the National Party. A key condition of this deal was a formal review of the Emissions Trading Scheme, which ultimately led to the significant watering down of the scheme in 2009 (e.g., the “two-for-one” deal where emitters only paid for half their emissions).

NOTE: The 2 for one deal ‘ NZ the biggest Climate Cheats in the World’. Buying cheap Russian & Ukraine Carbon Units knowing they were fraudulent. Contid to do so whilst they were kept for profiting for a future date. (2 Gareth Morgan Reports)

Controversy: In 2010, it was revealed that Kearney, then an ACT Board Member, had been involved in sharing sensitive government papers regarding the ETS with political activists to encourage public opposition. By 2016, the ACT Party removed the specific “New Zealand is not warming” language from its website, shifting its focus toward the economic inefficiency of domestic targets relative to global emissions.

NICK KEARNEY’S STANCE:

Prioritization: In 2025 local body election surveys, Kearney rated climate change action a 7 out of 10 in importance for decision-making.   Core Beliefs: As a candidate for Christchurch City Council, he emphasized protecting the environment as a priority, alongside tackling rising rates and improving service delivery.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Economic Focus: Historically, Kearney has critiqued policies that he believes harm small investors, such as previous government attempts to remove rental tax write-offs, reflecting ACT’s broader economic-first approach to regulation.

ACT Party’s 2026 Climate Policies:  As part of the current coalition government, ACT has successfully pushed for significant revisions to New Zealand’s climate legal framework.

Weakening International Alignment: ACT advocates for “taking back control” by removing requirements for the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) to align with international targets under the Paris Agreement. The party argues that Paris is “broken” and that New Zealand should be prepared to walk away if reforms aren’t achieved.

Legislative Changes (2025–2026):-

Zero Carbon Act: ACT has long sought to repeal or significantly weaken the Zero Carbon Act and the Climate Change Commission.

Methane Targets  The government is introducing legislation to weaken the 2050 biogenic methane target from the original 24–47% reduction to a less ambitious 14–24%.

Carbon Neutral Government: The deadline for government organizations to achieve carbon neutrality was shifted from 2025 to 2050.

Agricultural Emissions: ACT firmly opposes emissions pricing for agriculture, arguing it would gut rural New Zealand for no global environmental gain.

Infrastructure over Mitigation: ACT proposes shifting focus from “wasting billions” on mitigation to building resilient infrastructure (stormwater, bridges, ports) capable of handling extreme weather events.

Energy Policy: The party supports lifting bans on offshore gas exploration and treating coal mining as any other mining to ensure energy reliability.

 

ACT Climate Change Policy (2008)

Goal:  That no New Zealand government will ever impose needless and unjustified taxation or regulation on its citizens in a misguided attempt to reduce global warming or become a world leader in carbon neutrality.

Background

  • The Labour Government is determined that New Zealand will lead the world in the race to carbon neutrality even though nothing New Zealand could do, including disappearing off the face of the planet, would have any impact on global climate.
  • New Zealand is not warming. There is no warming trend since 1970 and the slight warming trend since 1950 is not statistically significant.
  • If it were to warm moderately, we would likely benefit in terms of land-based production, human health and reduced heating bills. Arguments that we would lose from sea-level rise or more extreme events are unproven conjectures.
  • Policies to reduce emissions in New Zealand could not conceivably reduce global warming, even if warming were globally harmful.
  • The Government ratified the Kyoto Protocol in advance of Australia for short-term political gain without the benefit of any supporting analysis from Treasury. New Zealand can expect to pay billions of dollars to foreign governments like Russia, for carbon credits to offset their emissions.
  • Now the government wants to force us all to pay more for fuel and electricity beyond 2012.
  • Treasury’s analysis of the Emissions Trading Scheme made no case that its benefits would exceed the costs. The scheme lends itself to corrupt allocations of permits and seedy MMP negotiations were necessary to ram it through parliament.
  • It is reckless to distort the New Zealand economy in the cause of an ineffectual Protocol that expires in 2012 and won’t be rolled forward because its 1990 targets are unacceptable to China and the United States.
  • The NZ Institute of Economic Research states in their 2008 study “The Impact of the Proposed Emissions Trading Scheme” that:
  • Dairy land values will fall by 40%
  • Beef and sheep land values will fall by 23%
  • Annual household incomes will fall by $3,000
  • The average hourly rate will fall by $2.30
  • Annually 22,000 new jobs will be lost
  • Only ACT opposes Labour in seeking to force New Zealanders to pay much more for energy and electricity.
  • ACT believes that New Zealand can play a responsible role in the international community while keeping its powder dry. In particular, it should not move faster than Australia or the United States.

PRINCIPLES

Freedom – People should be free to live and work how they choose, including making their own decisions as to what light bulbs to use, unless there is clear scientific evidence that their actions are damaging the environment, or unless they are harming others

Put New Zealanders needs first – Until there is clear scientific evidence that we should do otherwise, energy policy should be primarily concerned with affordability and stability of supply.

Proceed with caution – The precautionary principle works both ways. „Green Business‟ opportunities which address non-existent problems and needs are not “business opportunities” but a massive risk and likely to destroy wealth on a massive scale

Do not make needless rods for our own backs – The government is globally unique including methane gas (produced by ruminants) in calculating our Kyoto commitments. This is extreme, contrary to all other member countries and should be amended

Distinguish between real pollutants and carbon dioxide – carbon dioxide is a vital and necessary greenhouse gas crucial for plant growth and human survival

Make decisions based on sound science – not on blind belief or ideology which is increasingly divorced from reason

A commonsense approach to Climate Change would recognize that:-

  • There is no point destroying our economy in pursuit of „carbon neutrality‟ if carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are not driving global warming.
  • Any carbon trading scheme is prone to fraud – and indeed invites fraud

POLICY DETAIL

  • ACT will repeal the Emissions Trading Scheme and withdraw from the Kyoto Protocol
  • Major investments in infrastructure will not depend on the anti-global warming hypothesis for their economic viability. (Hydro power and geothermal power stands on its own feet.)
  • Reform the Resource Management Act and Local Government Act to be neutral on climate change and „sustainability‟ (often a code word for anti-global warming).
  • Reform Transport legislation to make transport serve efficiency and mobility rather than „sustainability‟ unless a real issue of sustainability can be identified
  • Ensure that government agencies and advisors acknowledge any conflicts of interest.

If you believe that New Zealanders should not be taxed on the basis of unproven global warming theories, then give ACT your Party vote, for better informed policy on climate change

www.act.org.nz

Authorized by Nick Kearney – 137 Beach Haven Rd Auckland

Act – The Guts To Do What’s Rights

file:///C:/Users/bette/Downloads/actclimatechange%20(3).pdf  (2 Pages )

...

Climate Alarmism Blog Posts View all Categories

SCARING CHILDREN INTO NIGHTMARES A MENTAL HEALTH DISORDER ‘ECO ANXIETY’

SCARING CHILDREN, VUNERABLE PEOPLE, FOR SOME IT WILL BE A FAIRYTALE. FOR  OTHERS IT WILL BE A NIGHTMARE ABOUT TO HAPPEN. SOME WILL CRY AND SOME WILL LAUGH AND JEER- THEY WILL BE CALLED SKEPTICS-  BUT EVERYONE IS THE TARGET.

Scary by image, design, text, front page propaganda that depicts that the end of the world is nigh. Scorching earth, wild fires, floods, sea level rises. Domestic migration residents must move away from the coastline where they live, including those in cities by the sea.

Yet here they are building retirement villages by the sea some priced at $2 million dollars for a small apartment. Wealthy individuals live in their mansions by the sea. But others are to move into Smart City, C40 Cities, to be controlled to be spied on everyday by camera’s facial recognition.

They want to take away your cars whereas those that are wealthy can own as many cars as they like, have a launch moored at the waters edge. Political leaders still fly all over the world whenever they like, are immune to these restrictions, regulations and controls.

Chicken Little- help, help, help the sky is falling in they will have you believe them, they announce ‘Trust Us’. Trust the tiny algorithms that you cannot see with the naked eye, trust the data and computer modeled information you cannot understand, that you may never ever view for yourself.

Ardern introduced the first Algorithm Charter in the world which all govt agencies have access to and use. Trust the scientists, researchers that rely on corporations, organizations, governments and philanthropist organizations that fund them out of their own self interests. Leading politicians want you to TRUST THEM..

Political leaders that scare the hell out Leaders of political parties scaring the hell out of children, vulnerable people. Children screaming with placards held high and voices of climate alarmism.

National Health in England have named Climate anxiety as a mental health disorder, young people, children having nightmares, anxiety attacks, feeling depressed because of the scary image driven victimizing text educational authorities dump on children in classrooms everywhere. UNESCO..WHO (UN) EDUCATION 2030 worldwide education from birth upwards.

Dishonesty, Misinformation Projects funded by Governments that allow politicians themselves to have corrupt, dishonesty immunity. The UN Secretary General Guterres announced ‘Global Boiling’.

Its not the climate that boiling its populations that have been placed in the Climate Cooling waters that have now been sucked into the corrupted global boiling pot.

The robbing of taxpayers, ratepayers and consumers both domestic and commercial of millions of dollars that could well end up being billions of dollars, there is no end to it, this ‘ambulance chaser propaganda journalism.

With no conscience, they go out of the way to capture the publics attention, their imagination with dramatic words, with unimaginable effects. The Ozone scare established in the 1980’s, blaming manmade CFC’s /HCFC’s  as they refer to the Ozone hole.

The so called ‘Ozone Hole’ makes it sound so dramatic as the hole is reported much larger than the size of Canada, and then the largest its ever been, and then its healing is getting smaller to the UN Montreal Protocol part of the Vienna Convention of 22md September 1988, the object of the Montreal Protocol of 1987 must be working.

The so called ‘Ozone Hole’ that is widely reported is not a hole but the thinning of the Ozone layer. The terminology ‘The Ozone Hole’ is just a metaphor for the ozone layer thinning. But this massive Ozone Hole’ sounds so dramatis and overwhelming to some people. (Psychological warfare)

As for the thinning of the ozone layers during the North and South Poles, this happens in the South in the winter months.

The stratospheric ozone is created when UV radiation (sunlight) hits oxygen molecules, which combine with other oxygen molecules to form ozone. No ozone layers are created at either the North Poplar or South Polar  Poles during the winter months in those regions

The ozone layers are created in the summer months, however ozone is a naturally unstable compound that has an average half-life of approx.., 2-3 months. In the warmers ozone layers, its half-life may only be a few days.

This means that every polar winter approx.., 50% of the ozone disintegrates , the ozone layers thins out, this is a natural event. However the US State Dept, Congress in the 1980’s hijacked, targeted the CFC’s, then the HCFC’s as a criminal agent.

The ozone alarmists only looking at recent history rather than long term history where the Ozone layer has waxed and waned got larger and shrunk.

They do not tell the public that CFC’s are 5-7 times heavier than air. Put some in a balloon and see what happens. With sufficient winds some CFCs may make it to higher altitudes, until they sink again. Only very small fractions of CFCs ever reach the stratosphere.

CFC’s do not destroy the ozone layer Chlorine does. Stratospheric UV (Sunlight) radiation has to first break apart CFC molecules to release chlorine. The problem is that mother nature produces far more naturally occurring chlorine than humans or animals could ever could.

There are more than 1,000 natural sources of chlorine much of this comes from plants, insects, oceans, solar storms but the most largest comes from volcanic eruptions. Studies from Harvard, France, Russia, Australia and many science center’s are raising the warming flags

During the CFC scare the earth was experiencing was higher than average volcanic eruptions. One single large volcanic eruption has leached more chemicals in the stratosphere than humans, animals that generate in many years of CFC human production, which is barely miniscule.

But nature will always do what nature always does not what International UN Laws dictate and mandate. Naturally if nature wants to annihilate our ozone layer at anytime and it virtually did 250 million years ago, this is the time of a massive prolonged Siberian super-volcanic eruptions that lasted for many years.

Approx., 95% of the ozone layer disintegrated, this is long before the extinction of the dinosaurs, this was called ‘The Great Dying’ approximately of all life finished. There was no fossil fuels then or Human made CFCs or CFC’s.

Natural Chlorine the Romans did not fossil fuel chariots when the climate was warmer then then now. Global boiling, some laugh, some cry, some become very scared and scared and anxious

However,eg corporations, environmental organizations, corporations, foundations, enviro environmental activists, vegan societies, agri-businesses, UN/WEF puppets- UN Nation State Governments they have legitimized the global agenda.

From the theory of Malthusian, to the Population Bomb, to Population to De-population. From the Eugenics of Socialist Margeret Sanger, to the Rockefellers, to International Planned Parenthood affiliated to Family Planning NZ.

From the Gates foundation that is one of the UN Agencies biggest funders to scaring, indoctrinating, manipulating young minds through UNESCO Agenda 2030 collaboration with wealth seeking Corporate Capture of WEF Schwab’s baby “Multi-stakeholder capitalism’, and Schwab’s 604 page Global Redesign of 2010 to the Great Reset-The narrow window of opportunity

If one has not learned from history then it is likely that one is condemned to repeat it..

1)Thomas Malthus -Population vs Natural Resources  (2) The Club Of Rome and the 1968 ‘Population Bomb’-Prof., Paul Ehrlich (3)Rockefeller Foundation and Population related fields (4) Margaret Sanger Eugenics-A Socialist Activist- founder of the International Planned Parenthood whom collaborated with Rockefeller of the UN Population Div.,

Global Cooling  (6) Global Warming, (7) Climate Crisis (8) Climate Disaster (9) Climate Catastrophe we must urgently act now   (10) The Ozone Hole Corruption (11)Corporate Capture and Political collaboration – Public-Private Partnerships. (PPPs)PPP- People – Planet and heaps of Profit. Corporate Capture. Smart Cities, Environmental Refugees’ and the worst fraud in human history Climate Corruption.. Massive Climate Crime by the way of simply book-keeping, no checks, no balances.

And New Zealand Government has the reputation as being the  ‘worst climate cheats in the world’. Climate Criminals That is my next video.

Researched By Carol Sakey

WakeUpNZ.

CLICK ON THE IMAGE TO LINK TO MY VIDEO

...

THE POLITICAL CESSPIT OF LIARS ‘GLOBAL BOILING’

Here is one of the biggest porkies on CO2 Greenhouse Emissions.

Countries worldwide rely of IPCC Assessment Reports in the decision making around Climate Change Policies, decision making, regulations. I have researched IPCC where I have found information that states ‘high accuracy of atmospheric CO2 concentrations were initiated by Charles David Keeling in 1958, that constitute the series of documenting the changing composition of the atmosphere. This has iconic status in climate change science as the evidence of human activities on the chemical composition of the global atmosphere.

Keeling’s measurements on the global carbon cycle are used effectively today and record the burning of fossil fuel.  To record fossil fuel emissions, demonstrate long term changes in the exchange of CO2 between the atmosphere, biosphere and oceans. The Keeling Curve is necessary in IPCC Assessments. The Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii measures the carbon dioxide molecules in dry air. Data collected is namely the Keeling Curve. This has been a critical measurement in climate science since the late 1950’s. The location of the Keeling Carbon Dioxide Detectors are on a site high on the slopes of the Mauna Loa Volcano. The CO2 measurements globally are measured on the high slopes of a Hawaiian volcano. The elevation level is 3,400m top of the volcano elevation is just over 4100m

Volcano’s emit carbon dioxide, thus the carbon dioxide measurements cannot be trusted, therefore they do not know whether global atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration is rising or not. The Mauna Loa Observatory has played a critical role in record gathering for more than 60 years by charting inexplorable rise of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.  But now the lava is flowing, the volcano erupted in November 2022, cut access and power to the site, halting critical monitoring. Detailed record taking since the late 1950’s, says Ralph Keeling son of David Keeling who is the Director of the CO@ Program at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography.  He said “Of all the evidence scientists have collected about our planets health, none is more important than a long running climate record gathered at the lonely post a top of Hawaii’s Mauna Loa Volcano”. Saying “Its played a critical role in understanding global climate change by charting carbon dioxide in the atmosphere

Its reported that the Mauna Loa Observatory is the world’s foremost monitoring site for Carbon dioxide and other altering greenhouse gases, CO2 monitoring has now been put on hold. Peiter Tans former scientist with NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory stated “there is no other CO2 monitoring site with the same advantages as the Hawaiian Observatory, it’s the worlds foremost observatory for Greenhouse gases. This has caused climate scientists huge concern. He also said the Mauna Loa record loss increases uncertainty of relationships of tracing CO2 and drought, and other climate anomalies on a seasonal and annual basis.

What Climate Scientists measure is about the sum of all their predictions wrapped up in an erupting volcano going up in ash, and lava slivering down the sides of the volcano. The Mauna Loa eruption of 1855 began in a similar location and sent lava flowing down the side of the volcano. That one lasted for six months. Its reported the  prospect of a similarly long pause in operations makes efforts to establish interim solutions all the more critical. For now, seismic activity is continuing beneath the currently active fissure, according to the U.S. Geologic Survey. The ground continues to rumble because magma is still rising up into it. When it will stop is anyone’s guess. But IPCC Climate Change Report was released on 2oth March 2023. The 2023 Global Stock take under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report.  The  measuring of Carbon Dioxide in the air globally, where methane emissions are significant.

A US Geological Survey (Gov) update reported the Mauna Loa Volcano as fast moving lava flows that happen on average every 6 years. Since 1843 has erupted 33 times. However, IPCC, Climate Scientists states that the Observatory on the Volcano is crucial in measuring Carbon Dioxide globally, green house emissions, chemicals in the atmosphere? Surely this is enough proof that you are being told a whopping porkie. This is about control of population worldwide. Its about the dilution of sovereign nations (countries) to a one world of global corporate capture. Of Stakeholder Capitalism to destroy farmers and small businesses. To destroy the Free Market Enterprising economy. Free market (Freedom to choose). It’s about Mass Migration implemented through a global Migration Task Force. It saddens me to hear at the Farmers Groundswell gathering at Ellerslie yesterday that so many farmers have bought into this global warming crap. I totally support the farmers, so I feel very sad about this.

 

 

LINKS:

https://www.discovermagazine.com/environment/ongoing-outage-of-worlds-foremost-co2-monitoring-site-is-a-serious-blow-to

https://www.kpbs.org/news/local/2023/06/05/latest-keeling-curve-is-bad-news-on-carbon-emissions

REFERENCES TO IPCC 36 PAGES https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/ar4-wg1-chapter1.pdf

https://youtu.be/OsWZn2QIehA  THE BIGGEST PORKIE TO DRIBBLE OUT OF THE POLITICAL CRONIES MOUTHS ‘GLOBAL BOILING’ IS MOUNTAINOUS  –

 

Research by Carol Sakey

 

...

HOW DARE YOU STEP OUTSIDE YOUR ‘MANDATORY ‘MAKE BELIEVE’ BUBBLE INTO A ‘SCIENCE IS UNSETTLED’ WORLD?

New Zealand’s Local Government – Auckland Council have membership to  the Global Covenant of Mayors and is a C40 City.  Alliances. World Economic Forum Stakeholders and a toolbox developed by the World Bank

Globally initiated implemented by ‘Auckland Unlimited’. The rapid transformation project is already underway as to transitioning society to a so called ‘holistic’  decarbonization

On the other side of the world  it’s interesting what UK Parliament say about the 5th IPCC Assessment Report.  Plant one trillion tree’s it still won’t change the climate. Some people just can’t see the wood through the tree’s.

 

WakeUpNZ

Researched By Carol Sakey

https://youtu.be/Sh-jhwkyQuo

https://rumble.com/v3pet5q-how-dare-you-step-outside-your-mandatory-make-believe-bubble-into-a-science.html

...
Carol Sakey
Climate Alarmism

ARE YOU FEELING HOT UNDER THE COLLAR FROM THIS REPORTED GLOBAL BOILING?

The IPCC was established and endorsed by the UN General Assembly in 1988
The last IPCC Assessment report was 8,000 page synthesis. 264 scientists with findings on physical climate science * 270 scientists on impacts, adaption and vulnerability to climate change, 278 scientists on climate change mitigation. (Synthesis report is the combination of different parts to make up the whole).

The Grim Reaper Secretary General UN Tedros announcing to the world “Global boiling has arrived”. That humans are responsible. Tedross stating in a stressed mannerism “The air is unbreathable, the heat is unbeatable, the level of fossil fuel profits and climate inaction is unacceptable”. The latest twist in the fear mongering as Guterres stated “Confirming that July 2023 has become the hottest month in the past 120,000 years”.

IPCC Section 4, ‘Near-term Responses in a Changing Climate’, assesses opportunities for scaling up effective action in the period up to 2040, in the context of climate pledges, and commitments, and the pursuit of sustainable development.
This is the era of ‘Global boiling, accelerated climate action by government leaders- policy makers, those that the public are not allowed any public debate about. Guterres the “era of global; warming has ended” we now have an “era of global warming”. Using fear and the pandering to ignorance I guess is a different kind of coercion, how ever coercion using fear is now a familiar one. Do as your told, change your behavior or you may get scolded or even scorched.

Persuasion far left socialism with controlling communist demands to impose their narratives on the whole population, where are the elements of the truth? Oh, that’s right = non-debatable.
Pushing, increasing fear is a well known tactic of promoting propaganda to support a narrative. Note in IPCC reports certain words such as ‘could’ this context has no content and what about likelihood of a referred event?

Political bullies that push the ever increasing lies to mislead and frighten people until they submit to whatever policies the government intend to impose. Agree or not agree they impose them anyway. Think about it ‘global boiling, scorching, scalding oouch steam burns, boiling water second degree burns eem touches the nerve endings. Of course its not global boiling. Oh, wait a bit, they are saying science is settled but they want you to feel frightened and unsettled.

UN Members Nation Governments worldwide have done their utmost to frighten populations of citizens into anxiety and distress, one crisis after another yep it does your head in. So you go silent, can’t deal with it anymore, bugger ‘Silence is Consent’. Loss of freedom is one of those responses to fear that the government has conjured up. Climate cooling, global warming, climate emergency, global boiling the only threat to existential humanity are the evil bastards that are playing this all or nothing fear mongering game with peoples lives.
There is no evidence of global boiling but there is evidence of the various scenarios adopted, embedded in the IPCC Assessment reports. This is all hot air and media hysteria the world is not on fire and the polar bears ae doing very nicely thank you.

Oh, by the way whom are behind the international climate governance beyond the State, these include individuals, companies, corporations, international organizations, industry associations, indigenous peoples, civil society organizations. The non-state actors involved in the UNFCCC system include environmental NGOs, activist groups, intergovernmental organizations, city networks, oil companies, consultancy and legal firms, carbon brokers, indigenous communities, trade unions, women’s groups, youth organizations and religious communities
You might find this interesting:-

The IPCC use certain scenario’s some are widely and aggressive. For example RCP 8.5 generally taken as a basis for the worse case scenario, is proved to be overestimation of projected coal outputs. It is also used for predicting mid century and earlier emissions based on current and stated policies

RCPs are space, time and dependent trajectories of future greenhouse gas concentrations and different pollutants caused by different human activities. RCP 8.5 is the highest baseline emissions scenario in which emission continue to rise throughout the 21st century, therefore much more severe than RCP4.5. This is quoted as being a ‘business as usual’ scenario, meaning the likely outcome of society does not make a concerted effort to cut greenhouse gas emissions

Researched By Carol Sakey

...